Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The emerging transgender phenomenon has ignited the national debate on journalistic practices of reporting on transgender issues. This study, via an experiment, investigates the effects of the journalistic uses of gender pronouns and names. The findings revealed that among the participants exposed to stories using male names, female pronouns elicited more negative implicit attitudes toward transgender people. Using the transgender subject’s preferred pronouns elicited more perceived news content credibility and perceived reporter professionalism.

Keywords

gender pronoun transgender framing journalism LGBTQ

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atwell Seate

Mastro

. (2016). Media’s influence on immigration attitudes: An intergroup threat theory approach. Communication Monographs, 83, 194-213. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1068433

Barker-Plummer

(2013). Fixing Gwen: News and the mediation of (trans)gender challenges. Feminist Media Studies, 13, 710-724. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.679289

Bartol

K. M.

(1979). Professionalism as a predictor of organizational commitment, role stress, and turnover: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 815-821. doi:10.2307/255817

Bever

(2016, October). Students were told to select gender pronouns. One chose “His Majesty” to protest “absurdity.” The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/10/07/a-university-told-students-to-select-their-gender-pronouns-one-chose-his-majesty/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c4aa92de64ba

Bligh

M. C.

Schlehofer

M. M.

Casad

B. J.

Gaffney

A. M.

(2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 560-597. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x

Borah

(2013). Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication, 30, 456-473. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737426

Bos

Lecheler

Mewafi

Vliegenthart

(2016). It’s the frame that matters: Immigrant integration and media framing effects in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 97-108. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.10.002

Capuzza

J. C.

(2016). Improvements still needed for transgender coverage. Newspaper Research Journal, 37, 82-94. doi:10.1177/0739532916634642

Capuzza

J. C.

Spencer

L. G.

(2015). Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

10.

Chou

H.-Y.

Yeh

M.-H.

(2018). Minor language variations in campaign advertisements: The effects of pronoun use and message orientation on voter responses. Electoral Studies, 51, 58-71. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.10.006

11.

Cruz

R. E.

Leonhardt

J. M.

Pezzuti

(2017). Second person pronouns enhance consumer involvement and brand attitude. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 104-116. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.05.001

12.

Dardis

Baumgartner

Boydstun

De Boef

Shen

(2008). Media framing of capital punishment and its impact on individuals’ cognitive responses. Mass Communication & Society, 11, 115-140. doi:10.1080/15205430701580524

13.

Dejean

(2017, October). How journalists fail trans people. Splinter. Retrieved from https://splinternews.com/how-journalists-fail-trans-people-1818845835

14.

Dixon

T. L.

Maddox

K. B.

(2005). Skin tone, crime news, and social reality judgments: Priming the stereotype of the dark and dangerous black criminal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1555-1570. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02184.x

15.

Druckman

Kam

(2011). Students as experimental participants. In Druckman

Green

Kuklinski

Lupia

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41-57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004

16.

Druckman

J. N.

Bolsen

(2011). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Journal of Communication, 61, 659-688. doi:0.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01562.x

17.

Dunne

M. J.

Raynor

L. A.

Cottrell

E. K.

Pinnock

W. J. A.

(2017). Interviews with patients and providers on transgender and gender nonconforming health data collection in the electronic health record. Transgender Health, 2, 1-7. doi:10.1089/trgh.2016.0041

18.

Echebarria Echabe

. (2013). Relationship between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The impact of application conditions. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 231-245. doi:10.5964/ejop.v9i2.544

19.

Enke

(2012). Transfeminist perspectives in and beyond transgender and gender studies. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

20.

Entman

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

21.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

22.

Fico

Richardson

J. D.

Edwards

S. M.

(2004). Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 7, 301-318. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_3

23.

Fischer

J. D.

(2009). Framing gender: Federal appellate judges’ choices about gender-neutral language. University of San Francisco Law Review, 43, 473-506.

24.

Fitzsimons

G. M.

Kay

A. C.

(2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 547-557. doi:10.1177/0146167203262852

25.

Gamson

W. A.

Modigliani

(1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In Braungart

R. D.

(Ed.), Research in political psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

26.

Garfinkel

(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

27.

GLAAD. (n.d.-a). GLAAD Media Reference Guide—AP, Reuters & New York Times Style. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/reference/style

28.

GLAAD. (n.d.-b). Doubly victimized: Reporting on transgender victims of crime. Retrieved from http://www.glaad.org/publications/transgendervictimsofcrime

29.

Graham

Cnaan

(2012). Teachers’ explicit and implicit attitude toward homosexuality: The role of internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

30.

Hall

R. H.

(1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33, 92-104. doi:10.2307/2092242

31.

Hameleers

van der Meer

(2019). Fight or flight? Attributing responsibility in response to mixed congruent and incongruent partisan news in selective exposure media environments. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566394

32.

Kerr

Von Glinow

M. A.

Schriesheim

(1977). Issues in the study of “professionals” in organizations: The case of scientists and engineers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 329-345. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90034-4

33.

(2018). Intermedia attribute agenda setting in the context of issue-focused media events: Caitlyn Jenner and transgender reporting. Journalism Practice, 12, 56-75. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1273078

34.

Lord

C. G.

Ross

Lepper

M. R.

(1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098

35.

Millisecond Software. (2013, August 22). Academic licenses and pricing: Inquisit 4 Web. Retrieved from http://www.millisecond.com/products/Inquisit4/academicweb.aspx

36.

Nelson

T. E.

Oxely

Z. M.

Clawson

R. A.

(1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behaviors, 19, 221-246.

37.

Norton

A. T.

Herek

G. M.

(2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738-753. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6

38.

Nosek

B. A.

Banaji

M. R.

Greenwald

A. G.

(2006). Sexuality IAT stimulus materials. Retrieved from http://implicit.harvard.edu

39.

Price

Tewksbury

(1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In Barnett

Boster

F. J.

(Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 173-212). New York, NY: Ablex.

40.

Satran

P. R.

(2017). A girl named Ezra? 88 traditional boys’ names now being used for girls. Retrieved from https://www.today.com/parents/baby-names-88-traditional-boy-names-now-given-girls-t104719

41.

Scheufele

D. A.

(1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

42.

Sela

Wheeler

S. C.

Sarial-Abi

(2012). We are not the same as you and I: Causal effects of minor language variations on consumers’ attitudes toward brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 644-661. doi:10.1086/664972

43.

Serano

(2016). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity (2nd ed.). Emeryville, CA: Seal Press.

44.

Sieczkowski

(2013, September). Cassidy Lynn Campbell, transgender teen, named homecoming queen. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/21/transgender-homecoming-queen_n_3968729.html

45.

Skidmore

(2011). Constructing the “good transsexual”: Christine Jorgensen, whiteness, and heteronormativity in the mid-twentieth-century press. Feminist Studies, 2, 270-300.

46.

Snizek

W. E.

(1972). Hall’s professionalism scale: An empirical reassessment. American Sociological Review, 37, 109-114.

47.

Spayd

(2017, May). Vague guidelines lead to a misstep on gender pronouns. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/public-editor/asia-kate-dillon-gender-pronoun-liz-spayd-public-editor.html

48.

Stryker

(2008). Transgender history. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.

49.

Taber

C. S.

Lodge

(2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x

50.

Tewksbury

Jones

Peske

M. A. R.

Vig

(2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804-829. doi:10.1177/107769900007700406

51.

Thorson

Vraga

Ekdale

(2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 289-313. doi:10.1080/15205430903225571

52.

Wallace

L. R.

(2019, August 15). How Trans Journalists are Challenging—and Changing—Journalism. Retrieved from https://niemanreports.org/articles/how-trans-journalists-are-challenging-and-changing-journalism/

53.

Westbrook

Schilt

(2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28, 32-57. doi:10.1177/0891243209340034

54.

Williams-Baucom

K. J.

Atkins

D. C.

Sevier

Eldridge

K. A.

Christensen

(2010). “You” and “I” need to talk about “us”: Linguistic patterns in marital interactions. Personal Relationships, 17, 41-56. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01251.x

55.

Zimmermann

Wolf

Bock

Peham

Benecke

(2013). The way we refer to ourselves reflects how we relate to others: Associations between first-person pronoun use and interpersonal problems. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 218-225. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.008

(Mis)matching: Journalistic uses of gender pronouns and names can influence implicit attitudes toward transgender people,perceived news content credibility,and perceived reporter professionalism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References