Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The codebook for analyzing newspaper corrections has remained nearly unchanged since 1936. This project sought to create and validate a new codebook. Study 1 analyzed a previous application of the original codebook and proposed a new version, which Study 2 and Study 3 then applied and tested. In both, the new codebook resulted in fewer underused categories and fewer uncategorized corrections. This study, therefore, recommends its new codebook for future analytical studies of newspaper corrections.

Keywords

newspaper corrections quantitative content analysis descriptive statistics print and online United States democratic theory accuracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance for Audited Media. (2013). Top 25 U.S. Newspapers for March 2013. Retrieved from http://auditedmedia.com/news/research-and-data/top-25-us-newspapers-for-march-2013/

Associated Press. (2016). 2016 consolidated financial statements. New York, NY: Author.

Associated Press. (2017). The Associated Press stylebook 2017: And briefing on media law. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Barkin

S. M.

Levy

M. R.

(1983). All the news that’s fit to correct: Corrections in the times and the post. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 218-225.

Berry

F. C.

(1967). A study of accuracy in local news stories of three dailies. Journalism Quarterly, 44, 482-490.

Bien-Aimé

(2016). AP stylebook normalizes sports as a male space. Newspaper Research Journal, 37, 44-57. doi:10.1177/0739532916634640

Blankenburg

W. B.

(1970). News accuracy: Some findings on the meaning of errors. Journal of Communication, 20, 375-386.

Brown

C. H.

(1965, February 13). Majority of readers give papers an A for accuracy. Editor & Publisher, pp. 13, 63.

Charnley

M. V.

(1936). Preliminary notes on a study of newspaper accuracy. Journalism Quarterly, 13, 394-401.

10.

Easton

(2017, August 15). AP content drives more Facebook engagements than individual publishers in June, July. Associated Press. Retrieved from https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2017/ap-content-drives-more-facebook-engagements-than-individual-publishers-in-june-july

11.

Freelon

(2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5, 20-33.

12.

Freelon

(2013). ReCal OIR: Ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 8, 10-16.

13.

Gwet

K. L.

(2008). Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(Pt. 1), 29-48. doi:10.1348/000711006X126600

14.

Gwet

K. L.

(2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability, 4th edition: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Washington, DC: Advanced Analytics.

15.

Hardin

Ash

(2011). Journalists provide social context missing from sports blogs. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(2), 20-35. doi:10.1177/073953291103200203

16.

Hayes

A. F.

Krippendorff

(2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.

17.

Hettinga

K. E.

(2013). Experiencing error: How journalists describe what it’s like when the press fails. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28, 30-41. doi:10.1080/08900523.2012.746529

18.

Hettinga

K. E.

Appelman

(2014). Corrections of newspaper errors have little impact. Newspaper Research Journal, 35(1), 51-63.

19.

Hettinga

K. E.

Appelman

Otmar

Posada

Thompson

(2018). Comparing and contrasting corrected errors at four newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 39, 155-168.

20.

Hettinga

K. E.

Clark

Appelman

(2016). Exploring the use of corrections on college newspapers’ websites. College Media Review, 53. Retrieved from http://cmreview.org/3380-2/

21.

Krippendorff

(2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30, 411-433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x

22.

Krippendorff

(2009). Testing the reliability of content analysis data. In Krippendorff

Bock

M. A.

(Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 350-357). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

23.

Lacy

Riffe

(1996). Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 963-973. doi:10.1177/107769909607300414

24.

Lacy

Watson

B. R.

Riffe

Lovejoy

(2015). Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92, 791-811. doi:10.1177/1077699015607338

25.

LaRocque

(2005, April 1). Corrections, however painful or funny, needed for credibility. Quill, 93(3), 31.

26.

Lindlof

T. R.

Taylor

B. C.

(2011). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

27.

Luke

D. A.

Caburnay

C. A.

Cohen

E. L.

(2011). How much is enough? New recommendations for using constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis of health stories. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 76-91.

28.

Maier

S. R.

(2005). Accuracy matters: A cross-market assessment of newspaper error and credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 533-551. doi:10.1177/107769900508200304

29.

Maier

S. R.

(2007). Setting the record straight. Journalism Practice, 1, 33-43. doi:10.1080/17512780601078845

30.

Marshall

(1977). Newspaper accuracy in Tucson. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 165-168.

31.

McChesney

R. W.

(2000, November 1). Journalism, democracy, . . . and class struggle. Monthly Review. Retrieved from https://monthlyreview.org/2000/11/01/journalism-democracy-and-class-struggle/

32.

Moses

(2003, March 10). “Post” plans to get jiggy on Sundays. Editor & Publisher, 136(10), 7.

33.

Nemeth

Sanders

(2009). Number of corrections increase at two national newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(3), 90-104. doi:10.1177/073953290903000307

34.

Phoenix Gazette adds new page to computer section. (1995, March 4). Editor & Publisher, 128(9), 15.

35.

Quarfoot

Levine

R. A.

(2016). How robust are multirater interrater reliability indices to changes in frequency distribution? The American Statistician, 70, 373-384. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1141708

36.

Riffe

Aust

C. F.

Lacy

S. R.

(1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 133-139. doi:10.1177/107769909307000115

37.

Russial

(1998). Goodbye copy desks, hello trouble? Newspaper Research Journal, 19(2), 2-17.

38.

Schoonjans

(2018). Comparison of proportions calculator. MedCalc. Retrieved from https://www.medcalc.org/calc/comparison_of_proportions.php

39.

Scott

W. A.

(1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325. doi:10.1086/266577

40.

Silverman

(2007). Regret the error: How media mistakes pollute the press and imperil free speech. New York, NY: Union Square Press/Sterling Publishing.

41.

Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp

42.

Tillinghast

W. A.

(1982). Newspaper errors: Reporters dispute most source claims. Newspaper Research Journal, 3(4), 15-23.

43.

Yang

(2014). A treat for all. Editor & Publisher, 147 (9), 15.

44.

Zaiontz

(2017). Real statistics using excel: Real statistics resource pack. Retrieved from http://www.real-statistics.com/free-download/real-statistics-resource-pack/

Error message: Creation of a revised codebook for analysis of newspaper corrections

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References