Bartik, Timothy J.1991. Who Benefits fromn State and Local Economit Development Policies. Kalamazoo, Mich.: Upjohn Inistitute for Employment Research.
2.
Batim, Howell S.1996. Practicing planning theory in a political world. In Lxplorations in Planning Theory, eds. S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 365-382. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
3.
Chrislip and Larson. 1994. C'ollaborative leadership. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey Boss.
4.
Christopherson, Susan, L.Hill, S.Jamieson, B.Johnson, P.King, M.Lee, M.Mermel, R.Moore, B.Sheehan, K.Steinke, and R. Weber. 1994. Industrial development agency accountability in New York State: A county view. Community Development Reports 2(2). CaRDI, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
5.
Church, David. 1995. June 1 teleconference introductory remarks. Faxed memo. New York State Planning Federation, Albany, N.Y.
6.
Contant, Cheryl. 1991. Communicating to effect behavioral change: A framework for public education programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research10 (2):89-97.
7.
de Neufville, Judith Innes. 1987. Knowledge and action: Making the link. Journal of Planning Education and Research6(2):86-92.
8.
Eisenger, Peter. 1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Ferraro, Giovanni. 1996. Planning as creative interpretation. In Explortions in Planning Theory. eds. S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 321-327. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
10.
Fiscal Policy Institute. 1992. New York State s Industrial Development Agencies: Boon or Boondoggle? Albany, N.Y..
11.
Forester, John. 1982. Planning in the face of power. Journal ofthe American Planning Association48:67-80.
12.
Forester, John. 1996. Argument, power and passion in planning practice. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 241-262. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
13.
Fosler, R. Scott. 1992. State economic policy: The emerging paradigm. Economic Development Quarterly February 1992.
14.
Fox, William, and Matthew Murray. 1993. State and local government policies. In Economic Adaptation: Alternativesfor Nonmetropolitan Areas, Comments ed. D. Barkley. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
15.
Gray, Barbara. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Groundfor Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey Bass.
16.
Gunn, Hazel D.1995. Local government's role in retaining capital for community economic development. Community Development Reports 3(3). CaRDI, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
17.
Healey, Patsy. 1996. The communicative work of development plans. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S. J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 253-288. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
18.
Pitt, Jessica. 1998. Community-based collaboratives: A study of inteorganizational cooperation at the neighborhood level. Paper presented at the Fannie Mae Foundation-ACSP housing and community development conference proceedings in Pasadena, October.
19.
Public Policy Institute. 1993. Economic Development: How Industrial Development Agencies Have Helped Generate Jobs and Tax Revenuesfor New York State and Its Localities. Albany, N.Y.
20.
Reese, Laura A.1992. Local economic development in Michigan: A reliance on the supply side. Economic Development Quarterly6(4): 383-393.
21.
Rogers, Everett M.1995. Dfifusion of Innovations. 4th edition. New York: Free Press.
22.
Schon, Don. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books Inc.
23.
Weiwel, Wim, and Michael Lieber. 1998. Goal achievement, relationship building and incrementalism: The challenge of university community partnerships. Journal of Planning Education and Research17(4):291-301.
24.
Wolman, Harold. 1988. Local economic development policy: What explains the divergence between policy analysis and political behavior. Journal of Urban Affairs10(1): 19-28.