This study presents the case of a neighborhood in South Phoenix, Arizona, where latent feelings of inequity in the community were heightened by a serious contamination incident. The incident amplified perceptions of environmental risk and reinforced perceptions of distributional, procedural, and process inequities. Housing prices within the affected area continue to reflect a risk-induced discount when compared to those in adjacent and similar neighborhoods. The property value diminution in the affected area has occurred despite assurances of governmental agencies that residual contaminants are within safe limits. The article concludes with a number of strategies for planners, which should help strengthen planning processes that involve environmental equity considerations in the central areas of our major cities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality . 1995. South Phoenix Waste Minimization Survey Project. Phoenix, Arizona.
2.
Atkinson, A.1992. Environmental inequity: An emerging concern for government. Maryland Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues5(1): 81-103.
3.
Blank, L.D.1994. Seeking solutions to environmental inequity: The Environmental Justice Act. Environmental Law24: 1109-1136.
4.
Bryant, B. , and Mohai, P.1992. Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards. San Francisco: Westview Press.
5.
Bullard, R.D.1992. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
6.
Bullard, RD.1993. The threat of environmental racism. Natural Resources and Environment7(3): 23-26.
7.
Bullard, R.D.1994. Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
8.
Burns, J.W. , R. Slovic, R.E. Kasperson, J.X. Kasperson, O. Renn, and S. Eman'i.1993. Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: Implications for theory construction and decision making. Risk Analysis13 (6): 611-623.
9.
Chalmers, J. , and S. Roehr. 1993. Issues in the valuation of contaminated property. The Appraisal Journal61(1): 28-41.
10.
Chalmers, J. , and T. Jackson. 1996. Risk factors in the appraisal of contaminated property. The Appraisal Journal64(1): 44-58.
11.
Collins, R.W.1992. Environmental equity: A law and planning approach to environmental racism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal11: 495-546.
12.
Colwell, P. F.1990. Power lines and land value. The Journal of Real Estate Research5(1): 117-126.
13.
Cutter, S.1995. Race, class and environmental justice. Progress in Human Geography19(1): 111-122.
14.
Flynn, J. , J. Chalmers, D. Easterling, R. Kasperson, H. Kunreuther, C.K. Mertz, A. Mushkatel, K.D. Pijawka, and P. Slovic. 1995. One Hundred Years of Solitude: Redirecting America's High Level Nuclear Waste Policy. San Francisco: Westview Press.
15.
Flynn, J. , P. Slovic, and C.K Mertz. 1994. Gender, race, and perceptions of environmental health risk. Risk Analysis14(6): 1101-1108.
16.
Furby, L. , R. Gregory, P. Slovic, and B. Fischhoff. 1988. Electric power transmission lines, property values, and compensation. Journal of Environmental Management27: 69-83.
17.
Gelobter, M.1994. The meaning of urban environmental justice. Fordham Urban Law Journal21: 841-856.
18.
Gottlieb, R1993. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement. Washington: Island Press.
19.
R. Gregory , J. Flynn, and P. Slovic. 1995. Technological stigma. American Scientist83(3): 220-223.
20.
Hendrick, P. 1994. Personal communication with Patrick Hendrick, neighborhood economic development officer, Neighborhood Services Department, City of Phoenix.
21.
Higgins, R.R.1993. Race and environmental equity: An overview of the environmental justice issue in the policy process. Polity26(2): 281-300.
22.
Kasperson, R.E. , O, Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J. Emel, Goble, J.X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis8(2): 177-187.
23.
Kohlhase, Janet . 1991. The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics30(1): 1-26.
24.
MacGregor, D. , P. Slovic, R. Mason, J. Detweiler, S. Binney, and B. Dodd. 1994. Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon. Risk Analysis14(1): 5-14.
25.
McClelland, G. , W.D. Schultze, and B. Hurd. 1990. The effect of risk beliefs on property values: A case study of a hazardous waste site. Risk Analysis10(4): 485-497.
26.
McEvoy, S.A.1994. Double edged sword of Damocles: Utility companies' liability for diminution of property values due to electromagnetic fields. Real Estate Law Journal23(2): 109-122.
27.
Mundy, W.1992. The impact of hazardous material on property value. The Appraisal Journal60: 155-162.
28.
Mushkatel, A. , D. Pijawka, and T. Glickman. 1993. The perceived risks of transporting hazardous materials and nuclear waste. In Transportation of Dangerous Goods: Assessing the Risks, ed. F. Frank Saccomanno and Keith Cassidy, 617-635. Waterloo, Canada: Institute for Risk Research.
29.
Nelson, A. , C. Genereaux, M. Genereaux. 1992. Price effects of landfills on house values. Land Economics68(4): 359-365.
30.
Nelson, J.P.1982. Highway noise and property values. Journal of Transport Economics and PolicyXVI(2): 117-138.
31.
Norton, B.G.1991. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Page, G.W. , and H. Rabinowitz. 1993. Groundwater contamination: Its effects on property values and cities. Journal of the American Planning Association59(4): 473-485.
33.
Patchin, P.J.1991a. The valuation of contaminated properties. Real Estate Issues16(2): 50-54.
34.
Patchin, P.J.1991b. Contaminated properties: Stigma revisited. The Appraisal Journal59: 167-172.
35.
Pijawka, K.D. , and A. Mushkatel. 1992. Public opposition to the siting of the high level nuclear waste repository: The importance of trust. Policy Studies Review10(4): 180-194.
Slovic, P. , J. Flynn, J., and R Gregory. 1994. Stigma happens: Social problems in siting of nuclear waste facilities. Risk Analysis13: 773-777.
38.
Slovic, P. , M. Layman, N. Kraus, J. Flynn, J. Chalmers, G. and Gesell. 1991. Perceived risk stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis11: 683-696.
39.
Smolen, G. , G. Moore, and L. Conway. 1992. Hazardous waste landfill impacts on local property values. The Real Estate Appraiser58(4): 4-11.
40.
Weeks, S.1995. Communicating Environmental Risk in Urban Areas: a Multi-Case Analysis. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
