Can rationality and pragmatism be integrated? By responding to some of the most compelling arguments against the rational paradigm, this paper uses the pragmatism of William James to construct a new notion of pragmatic rationality in planning. This rationality looks towards consequences rather than causes, integrates facts and values, and rejects the search for ultimate foundations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Ernest R.1988. After rationality. Society26 (1): 15-19.
2.
Alexander, Ernest R.1992. A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association58 (2): 190-200.
3.
Altshuler, Alan.1965. The City Planning Process: A PoliticalAnalysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
4.
Baum, Howell.1983. Planning and Public Expectations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman.
5.
Beauregard, Robert A.1995. Edge critics. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 14 (3): 163-66.
6.
Blanco, Hilda.1994. How to Think about Social Problems: American Pragmatism and the Idea of Planning. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
7.
Boyer, M.C.1983. Dreaming the Rational City. Cambridge : MIT Press.
8.
Brent, Joseph.1993. Charles Sanders Peirce. A Life. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
9.
Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock.1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Churchman, C. West.1953. Concepts without primitives. Philosophy of Science20(4): 257-265.
11.
Churchman, C. West.1979. The System Approach and its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.
12.
de Neufville, J.1983. Usable planning theory: an agenda for research and education . In Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice, ed. Barry Checkoway.Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
13.
Dear, Michael.1988. The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography . Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. N.S. 13: 262-274.
14.
Dyke, Charles.1981. Philosophy of Economics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
15.
Elster, Jon.1983. Sour Grapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Faludi, Andreas.1985. The return of rationality. In Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning, eds. M. Breheny and A. Hooper.London: Pion, pp. 27-47.
18.
Faludi, Andreas.1986. Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology. London: Pion.
19.
Fisher, R.A. [1937] 1960. The Design of Experiments. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
20.
Fischer, F. and J. Forester , eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
21.
Forester, John.1980. Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association46 (3): 275-286.
22.
Forester, John.1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice: Towards a Critical Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Friedmann, John.1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
Friedmann, John.1995. Teaching planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (3): 156-162.
25.
Harper, T.L. and S.M. Stein.1994. Neo-pragmatism and planning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning in Tempe, Arizona, 3-6 November.
26.
Harris, Britton.1985. Rationality and its enemies. In Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning, eds. M. Breheny and A. Hooper.London: Pion, pp. 60-76.
27.
Hoch, Charles.1984. Doing good and being right. Journal oftheAmerican Planning Association50 (3): 335-345.
28.
Hudson, Barcley M.1979. Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradiction. Journal of the American Planning Association45: 387-398
29.
James, William. [1907] 1947. Pragmatism. A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longman's Green.
30.
James, William.1967. The pragmatic method. In Writings of William James. ed. J.J. McDermott.New York: The Modern Library. (originally published as "Meaning of Truth," 1909)
31.
Kant, Immanuel. [1787] 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. English Translation by Norman Kemp Smith. Toronto: Macmillan.
32.
Klosterman, Richard.1983. Facts and values in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association49: 216-225.
33.
Krueckeberg, D.A.1995. The difficult character of property. To whom do things belong?Journal of the American Planning Association61: 301-309.
34.
Lindblom, Charles.1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review39: 517-525.
35.
Mandelbaum Seymour J.1985. The institutional focus of planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research5: 3-9.
36.
Mannheim, Karl.1949. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt Brace.
37.
McCloskey, D.1985. The Rhetoric ofEconomics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
Mitroff, Ian I.1983. Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind. San Francisco : Josey Bass.
39.
Moore, Terry.1978. Why allow planners to do what they do? A justification from economic theoryAIP Journal. 44: 387-398.
40.
Nozick, Robert.1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
Peirce, Charles Sanders.1958. Collected Papers. Vol. I-VI. Eds. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss.Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
42.
Rittel, Horst.1972. On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the first and second generationsBedriftsokonomen8: 390-396.
43.
Rittel, H.W.J. and M.M. Webber.1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences4:155-69.
44.
Ryan, Alan.1991. When it's rational to be irrational. The New York Review, (October 10, 1991).
45.
Schoeffler, Sidney.1954. Toward a general definition of rational action. Kyklos7 (3): 245-273.
46.
Schön, Donald.1986. Toward a new epistemology of practice. In Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice, ed. Barry Checkoway.Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, pp. 231-250.
47.
Shweder, R.A.1986. Divergent rationalities. In Metatheory in Social Science, eds. D.W. Fiske and R.A. Shweder.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 163-196.
48.
Simon, Herbert.1982. Models of Bounded Rationality: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
49.
Simon, Herbert.1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
50.
Throgmorton, James.1993. Planning as rhetorical activity. Journal of the American Planning Association59 (3): 334-346.
51.
Verma, Niraj.1993. Metaphor and analogy as elements of a theory of similarity for planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research13(1) 13-25.
52.
Verma, Niraj.1994. Organizations and their purposes: a note on churchman's philosophy of management. Interfaces24: 60-66.
53.
Verma, Niraj.1995. What is planning practice? The search for suitable categories . Journal of Planning Education and Research14: 178-182.
54.
Weaver, C., J. Jessop, and V. Das.1985. Rationality in the public interest: notes towards a new synthesis. In Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning , eds. M. Breheny and A. Hooper.London: Pion, pp. 145-165.
