Anderson, J., and M. Adams.1992. Acknowledging the learning styles of diverse student populations: Implications for instructional design. In Teaching for Diversity, eds. N. Chism and L. Border.San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Commission on the Doctorate in Planning.1992. Report of the Commission on the Doctorate in Planning to the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. (Copies available from Rolf Engler, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139.)
3.
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Working Committee on the Recruitment and Retention of Women and Minorities in Planning Education. 1990. The recruitment and retention of faculty women and faculty of color in planning education: Survey results. ACSP Update Special Issue:2-26.
4.
Barnard, I.1992. Bibliography for an anti-homophobic pedagogy: A resource for students, teachers, administrators, and activists. Feminist Teacher7(3):50-52.
5.
Berman, P., ed. 1992. Debating P.C. New York: Dell.
6.
Bloom, A.1987. The Closing of the American Mind. How Higher Education has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today's StudentsNew York: Simon and Schuster.
7.
Buraydi, M.1993. Dualism and universalism: Competing paradigms in planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research12:223-229.
8.
Burnier, D.1992. Administrative woman and administrative man: Teaching public administration from a gender inclusive perspective. Feminist Teacher7:26-30.
9.
Christopherson, S.1989. On being outside "the project." Antipode21:83-89.
10.
Córdova, T.1994. Refusing to appropriate: The emerging discourse on planning and race. Journal of the American Planning Association60:242-243.
11.
Dalton, L.1986. Why the rational paradigm persists: The resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research5:147-153.
12.
Dalton, L.1993. The dilemmas of the times. Journal of the American Planning Association59:149-152.
13.
D'Souza, D.1991. Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on CampusNew York: Free Press .
14.
Ehrenrich, B.1992. The challenge for the left. In Debating P. C, ed. P. Berman.New York: Dell.
15.
Feagin, J.1992. The continuing significance of racism: Discrimination against black students in white colleges. Journal of Black Studies22:546-578.
16.
Friedmann, J., and C. Kuester.1994. Planning education for the late twentieth century: An initial inquiry. Journal of Planning Education and Research14:55-64.
17.
Graff, G.1992. Beyond the Culture Wars: How Teaching the Conflicts Can Revitalize American EducationNew York: Norton.
18.
Galindo, Y., B. Pitman, M.B. Welch, and S. Wirka.1987. Accepting the challenge: Gender, race, and disability in planning education: Steps toward achieving a student and professional body representative of the population at large. Report to the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Executive Committee Meeting, 5 November.
19.
Galis, L.1993. Merely academic diversity. Journal of Higher Education64:93-101.
20.
Harding, S.1986. The instability of analytical categones of feminist theory . Signs11:645-664.
21.
Herrington, A., and M. Curtis.1990. Basic writing: Moving the voices on the margin to the center. Harvard Educational Review60:489-496.
22.
Hill, E.1989. Increasing minority representation in the planning professoriate . Journal of Planning Education and Research9:139-142.
23.
hooks, b.1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press .
24.
Kaufman, J.1993. Key issues facing planning education in the 1990s . ACSP Update91:2-3.
25.
King, A.1993. NEA presidential address, 1992: Policy issues in the postsecondary education of African Americans. Review of Black Political Economy21(4):5-18.
26.
Knopp, L.1992. Sexuality and the spatial dynamics of capitalism . Environment and Planning D 10:651-669.
27.
Mandelbaum, S.1990. Telling stories. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:209-214.
28.
Marns, P.1987. Meaning and Action: Community Planning and Conceptions of Change. Revised Edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
29.
Marris, P.1990. Witnesses, engineers, or storytellers? The influence of social research on social policy. In Sociology in America , ed. H. Gans.Newberry Park, California: Sage.
30.
McClintock, M.1989. Ten ways educators can limit or empower members of subordinate social groups. Journal of Experiential Education12(3):37-39.
31.
Mier, R.1994. Some observations on race in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association60:235-240.
32.
Moore Milroy, B.1989. Constructing and deconstructing plausibility. Environment and Planning D 7:313-326.
33.
Morgan, F.1992. Race/Ethnicity Trends in Degrees Conferred by Institutions of Higher Education: 1980-81 through 1989-90 National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
34.
Prakash, V., and V. Brusi Amador, eds. 1992. Guide to Graduate Education in Urban and Regional Planning. 8th Edition. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
35.
Pratt, G.1993. Reflections on poststructuralism and feminist empirics, theory and practice. Antipode25:51-63.
36.
Rice, J.1993. Back to school: Women, welfare, and access to higher education. Adult Learning May/June:10-11, 23.
37.
Richardson, L.1994. Making good: MEP-turning long shots into successes . Black Issues in Higher Education11 (8):10-11.
38.
Ritzdorf, M.1993. The fairy's tale: Teaching planning and public policy in a different voice. Journal of Planning Education and Research12:99-106.
39.
Rodnguez, S.1993. Schools for today, graduates for tomorrow. Journal of the American Planning Association59:152-155.
40.
Rosenau, P.1992. Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, New Jersey: Pnnceton University Press.
41.
Ross, C.1989. Increasing minority and female representation in the profession: A call for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research9:135-138
42.
Rydin, Y., and G. Myerson.1989. Explaining and interpreting ideological effects: A rhetorical approach to greenbelts. Environment and Planning D 7:463-479
43.
Sandercock, L., and A. Forsyth.1992. A gender agenda: New directions for planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association58:49-59.
44.
Servon, L.1993. The Intersection of Gender and Planning. Chicago, Illinois: Council of Planning Librarians .
45.
Smith, D.M., and D.A. Kolb.1986. User's Guide for the Learning Style Inventory: A Manual for Teachers and Trainers. Boston, Massachusetts: McBer.
Spelman, E.1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
48.
Subcommittee on a National Urban Policy.1993 . Shaping a National Urban Agenda. The Role of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. Los Angeles: Center for Afro-American Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
49.
Throgmorton, J.1992. Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois. Journal of Planning Education and Research12:17-31.
50.
Throgmorton, J.1993. Planning as a rhetorical activity: Survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal of the American Planning Association59:334-346.
51.
Van NoteChism, N., J. Cano, and A. Pruitt.1990. Teaching in a diverse environment: Knowledge and skills needed by TAs. In Teaching Assistant Training in the 1990s, eds. J. D. Nyquist , R. D. Abbott, and D. H. Wulff: San Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass.
52.
West, C.1992. Diverse new world. In Debating P. C, ed. Paul Berman.New York: Dell.
53.
Young, C.1992. Issues of access and retention for Afro-Americans in higher education. Phylon49:55-60.