Allen, J.1994. Consensus-Building in Metropolitan Planning: A Case Study of the Greater London Council, 1981-1986Berkeley : Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
2.
Altshuler, A.1965. The City Planning Process. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
3.
Bardach, E.1977. The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
4.
Baum, H.1983. Planners and Public Expectations. Cambridge Massachusetts : Schenkman.
5.
Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann.1967. The Social Construction of RealityGarden City, New Jersey: Doubleday .
6.
Bernstein, R.J.1971. Praxis and ActionPhiladelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
Bernstein, R.J.1976. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
Bolan, R.1991. Planning and institutional design. Planning Theory5-6:7-35.
9.
Braybrooke, D., and C.E. Lindblom.1963. A Strategy of Decision Policy Evaluation as a Social ProcessNew York: Free Press.
10.
Bryson, J.1988. Strategic Planning For Public and NonProfit Organizations . San Francisco, Califorma: Jossey Bass.
11.
Bryson, J., and B. Crosby.1992. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared Power WorldSan Francisco, California: Jossey Bass.
12.
Bryson, J., and B. Crosby.1993. Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas and courts. Environment and Planning B 20:175-194.
13.
Buchanan, J. M., and G. Tullock , eds. 1962. The Calculus of ConsentAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
14.
Christensen, K.1985. Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association51:63-73.
15.
Churchman, C.W.1968. The Systems ApproachNew York : Dell.
16.
de Neufville, J.I.1975. Social Indicators and Public Policy: Interactive Processes of Design and ApplicationAmsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.
17.
de Neufville, J.I.1983. Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap . Journal of Planning Education and Research3:35-45.
18.
de Neufville, J.I.1987. Knowledge and action: Making the link. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:86-92.
19.
de Neufville, J.I., and S. Barton.1987. Myths and the definition of policy problems: An exploration of homeownership and public private partnerships . Policy Sciences20:181-206.
20.
Dryzek, J.1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21.
Dryzek, J.1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political ScienceCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Etzioni, A.1968. The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political ProcessesNew York: Free Press .
Faludi, A.1992. Understanding Dutch strategic planning. Planning Theory Newsletter7-8.
25.
Fischer, F., and J. Forester.1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and PlanningDurham, North Carolina : Duke University Press.
26.
Fischler, R.1993. Standards of development. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.
27.
Flyvbjerg, B.1992. Aristotle, Foucault and progressive phronesis. Planning Theory78:65-83.
28.
Forester, J.1989. Planning in The Face of Power. Berkeley : University of California Press.
29.
Foucault, M.1980. The History of Sexuality. New York : Random House.
30.
Foucault, M.1983. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd edition, eds. H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow.Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Friedman, M.1974. Neoclassical Market TheoryChicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Friedmann, J.1987. Planning in the Public Domain. From Knowledge to Action . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
33.
Giddens, A.1984. The Constitution of SocietyBerkeley : University of California Press.
34.
Habermas, J.1984. The Theory of Communicative Action Trans. by T. McCarthy.Boston, Massachusetts : Beacon Press.
35.
Hardin, G.1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science162:1243-1248.
36.
Harper, T.L., and S.M. Stem.1992. The centrality of normative ethical theory to contemporary planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:105-116.
37.
Healey, P.1992. A planner's day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association58:9-20.
38.
Healey, P.,P. McNamara, M. Elson, and A. Doak.1988. Landuse Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change: The British Planning System in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Hirschman, A.O.1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
40.
Hirschman, A.O.1967. The principle of the hiding hand. Public Interest6:10-23.
41.
Howe, E.1990. Normative ethics in planning. Journal of Planning Literature5:123-150.
42.
Howe, E.1992. Professional roles and the public interest in planning . Journal of Planning Literature6:230-248.
43.
Howe, E.1994. Acting on Ethics in PlanningNew Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press .
44.
Howe, G., and J. Kaufman.1979. The ethics of contemporary American planners. Journal of the American Planning Association45:243-255.
45.
Innes, J.1988. The power of data requirements. Journal of the American Planning Association54:275-278.
46.
Innes, J.1990. Understanding the alliance of knowledge and policy. Introduction . In Knowledge and Public Policy. The Search for Meaningful Indicators2nd edition. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers .
47.
Innes, J.1992a. Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont and New Jersey. Journal of American Planning Association58:440-453.
48.
Innes, J.1992b. Report of the Commission on the Doctorate in Planning to the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.
49.
Innes, J.1994. Planning institutions in crisis. Planning Theory.
50.
Innes, J.1995. Designing institutions for communicative rationality . Journal of Planning Education and Research14:140-143.
51.
Innes, J., J. Gruber, M. Neuman, and R. Thompson.1994. Coordination through consensus building: California case studies. Report prepared for the California Policy Seminar, Berkeley, California, University of California, Berkeley.
52.
Kuhn, T.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edition. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Lee, D.1973. Requiem for the large scale model. Journal of the American Institute of Planners39:163-178.
54.
Liggett, H.1991. Where they don't have to take you in: The representation of homelessness in public policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:201-214.
55.
Lindblom, C.1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review19:79-99.
56.
Mandelbaum, S.1991. Telling stones. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:209-214.
57.
Mandelbaum, S., L. Mazza , and R. Burchell, eds. In press. Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, New Jersey : CUPR Press.
58.
Neuman, M.1993. Planning as institutional design. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Berkeley.
59.
Olson, M.1965. The Logic of Collective Action Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
60.
Ostrom, E.1990. Governing the Commons The Evolution of Institutions for Collective ActionCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Peattie, L.1987. Planning: Rethinking Ciudad GuayanaAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
Pressman, J.L., and A. Wildavsky.1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
Putnam, R.D.1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern ItalyPnnceton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
64.
Rapoport, A., and A.N. Chammah.1965. Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
65.
Rittel, H., and M.M. Webber.1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences4:155-169.
66.
Rivlin, A.1971. Systematic Thinking for Social ActionWashington, D.C.: Brookings.
67.
Sandercock, L., and A. Forsyth.1990. Gender: A new agenda for planning theory . Planning Theory Newsletter Winter:61-92.
