Barton, S.E.1984. Conflict resolution as necessity, practice, and ideal . Journal of Planning Education and Research4:96-102.
2.
Baum, H.S.1989. Yonkers: The case for community planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research8:177-179.
3.
Beauregard, R.A.1989. Review of Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action by J. Fnedmann. Journal of Planning Education and Research9:57-58.
4.
Bolan, R.S.1981. Do planning theory courses teach planning theory?Journal of Planning Education and Research1:12-16.
5.
Bryson, J.M., P. Bromiley, and Y.S. Jung.1990. Influences of context and process on project planning success. Journal of Planning Education and Research9:183-195.
6.
de Neufville, J.I.1983. Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap . Journal of Planning Education and Research3:35-45.
7.
de Neufville, J.I.1987. Knowledge and action: Making the link. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:86-92.
8.
Dyckman, J.W.1969. The practical uses of planning theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35:298-300.
9.
Forester, J.1987. Teaching and studying planning practice: An analysis of the "Planning and Institutional Processes" course at MIT. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:116-137.
10.
Forester, J.1993. Preface. In Profiles of Planners in Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning, eds. J. Forester and B. Kreiswirth.Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning (mimeograph).
11.
Friedmann, J.1987. Planning in the Public Domain. From Knowledge to Action . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
12.
Fnedmann, J.1989. Planning in the public domain: Discourse and praxis . Journal of Planning Education and Research8:128-131.
13.
Friedmann, J.1993. Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association59:482-485.
14.
Friedmann, J., and B. Hudson.1974. Knowledge and action: A guide to planning theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners40:2-16.
15.
Harper, T.L., and S.M. Stein.1992. The centrality of normative ethical theory to contemporary planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:105-116.
16.
Hoch, C.J., and A. Cibulskis.1987. Planning threatened: A preliminary report about planners and political conflict. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:99-107.
17.
Kaufman, J.L.1987. Teaching planning students about strategizing, boundary spanning and ethics: Part of the new planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:108-115.
18.
Krieger, M.H.1988. Courage and character in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research7:191-194.
19.
Krieger, M.H.1991. Contingency in planning: Statistics, fortune, and history . Journal of Planning Education and Research10:157-161.
20.
Krumholz, N.1986. From planning practice to academia. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:60-65.
21.
Lang, J.1983. Teaching planning to city planning students. An argument for the studio/workshop approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research2:122-129.
22.
Lauber, D.1993. The more things change... Journal of the American Planning Association59:486.
23.
Lusk, P., and M. Kantrowitz.1990. Teaching students to become effective planners through communication: A planning communications studio. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:55-59.
24.
Mier, R.1986. Academe and the community: Some impediments of professional practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:66-70.
25.
Orlick, S.C.1993. Justifying the value of a formal planning education . Environment and Planning B 20:499-510.
26.
Rabinovitz, F.1989. The role of negotiation in planning, management, and policy analysis. Journal of Planning Education and Research8:87-95.
27.
Susskind, L.E., and C. Ozawa.1984. Mediated negotiation in the public section. Journal of Planning Education and Research4:5-15.
28.
Toulmin,S.1992. Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.