Albrecht, J.1985. Planning as Social Process. The Use of Critical Theory . Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.
2.
Alexander, E.R.1987. Planning as development control. Town Planning Review58:453-467.
3.
Alexander, E.R.1988. After rationality. Society26:15-19.
4.
Alexander, E.R.1992. A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association58:190-200.
5.
Allison, L.1986. What is urban planning for?Town Planning Review57:5-16.
6.
Beauregard, R.A.1987. The object of planning. Urban Geography8:367-373.
7.
Beauregard, R.A.1991. Without a net: Modernist planning and the postmodern abyss. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:189-194.
8.
Bryson, J.M., and A.L. Delbecq.1979. A contingent approach to strategy and tactics in project planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners45:167-179.
9.
de Neufville, J.I.1987. Knowledge and action: Making the link. Journal of Planning Education and Research6:86-92.
10.
Diesmg, P.1950. The nature and limitations of economic rationality . Ethics61:12-26.
Forester, J.1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley : University of California Press.
18.
Forester, J.1990. No planning or administration without phenomenology?Public Administration Quarterly14:56-65.
19.
Forester, J.1991. Anticipating implementation: Reflective and normative practices in policy analysis and planning. In The Reflective Turn. Case Studies in and on Educational Practice, ed. D. A. Schon.New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Forester, J.1992. Critical ethnography: On fieldwork in a Habermasian way . In Critical Management Studies, eds. M. Alvesson and H. Wilmott.Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
21.
Forester, J.1993a. Learning from practice stones: The priority of practical judgment. In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, eds. F. Fischer and J. Forester.Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
22.
Forester, J.1993b. Beyond dialogue to transformative learning: How deliberative rituals encourage political judgment in community planning processes. Paper presented at the Workshop on Evaluating the Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning. Bari, Italy.
Friedmann, J.1967. A conceptual model for the analysis of planning behavior . Administrative Science Quarterly12:225-252.
25.
Fnedmann, J.1973. Retracking America. A Theory of Transactive Planning . Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday .
26.
Friedmann, J.1987. Planning in the Public Domain. From Knowledge to Action . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
27.
Friedmann, J.1992. Empowerment. The Politics of Alternative Development . Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Friedmann, J.1993. Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association59:482-485.
29.
Harper, T.L., and S.M. Stein. In press. Out of the postmodern abyss: Preserving the rationale for liberal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research14.
30.
Hayek, F.A.1944. The Road to Serfdom. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31.
Healey, P.1983. Local Plans in British Land Use Planning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
32.
Healey, P.1992. A planner's day. Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association58:9-20.
33.
Hudson, B.M.1979. Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association45:387-398.
34.
Jacobs, J.1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The Failure of Town Planning. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican Books.
35.
Knudsen, T.1988. Success in planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12:550-563.
36.
Kraushaar, R.1988. Outside the whale: Progressive planning and the dilemmas of radical reform. Journal of the American Planning Association54:91-100.
37.
Kravitz, A.S.1970. Mandarinism: Planning as handmaiden to conservative politics . In Planning and Politics: Uneasy Partnership, eds. T. L. Beyle and G. T. Lathrop.New York: Odyssey Press.
38.
Lindblom, C.1959. The science of "muddling through." Public Administrtion Review19:79-88.
39.
Lowe, S.1986. Urban Social Movements. The City after Castells . London: Macmillan.
40.
March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen.1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations . Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget .
41.
McCloskey, M.C.1971. Planning and regional planning - What are they? An annotated bibliography of definitions. Council of Planning Librarians Exchange Bibliography No 174.
42.
Moore, T.1978. Why allow planners to do what they do? A justification from economic theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners44:387-398.
43.
Owens, S.1986. Energy, Planning and Urban Form. London : Pion.
44.
Reade, E.1991. Review article: The barefoot technocrat. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research8:185-192.
45.
Robertson, D.B.1989. Planned incapacity to succeed? Policy-making structure and policy failure. Policy Studies Review8:241-263.
46.
Sager, T.1990. Communicate or Calculate. Planning Theory and Social Science Concepts in a Contingency Perspective. Dissertation 11. Nordic Institute for Studies in Urban and Regional Planning. Stockholm.
47.
Sager, T.1992. Why plan? A multi-rationality foundation for planning . Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research9:129-247.
48.
Sager, T.1993. Paradigms for planning: A rationality-based classification . Planning Theory9:79-118.