Alexander, E.R.1992. A transaction theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association58:190-200.
2.
Alexander, E.R.1993. To plan or not to plan, that is the question: Transaction cost theory and its implications for planning. Draft manuscript.
3.
Alinsky, S.D. [ 1946] 1969. Reveille for Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
4.
Altshuler, A.1965. The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis . Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
5.
Archibugi, F.1992a. Towards a new discipline of planning. Working Paper 92.7. Rome: Planning Studies Centre .
6.
Archibugi, F.1992b. The resetting of planning studies. Reprint A92.7. Rome: Planning Studies Centre.
7.
Argyris C., and D. Schon.1978. Organizational Learning. A Theory of Action PerspectiveReading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Barber, B.1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New AgeBerkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Beauregard, R.A.1989. Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D 7:381-395.
10.
Beauregard, R.A.1991. Without a net: Modernist planning and the postmodern abyss. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:189-194.
11.
Brown, W.H., and C.E. Gilbert1961. Planning Municipal Investment: A Case Study of Philadelphia . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Cohen, S.1969. Modern Capitalist Planning. The French Model. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press .
13.
Cook, J., and M. Fonow1986. Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry56:2-29.
14.
Devons, E.1950. Planning in PracticeCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15.
Etzioni, A.1968. The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press .
16.
Fals Borda, O.1988. Knowledge and People's Power Lessons with Peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico, and Columbia. New York: New Horizon Press.
17.
Fals Borda, O., and M. Rahman , eds. 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York : Apex Press.
18.
Faludi, A., ed. 1973. A Reader in Planning TheoryNew York: Pergamon Press.
19.
Faludi, A., 1986. Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology. London: Pion.
20.
Flyvbjerg, B.1991. Rationalitet og Magt. (Rationality and Power Vol. 1 & 2. Copenhagen : Academisk Forlag.
21.
Forester, J.1985. Critical theory and planning practice. In Critical Theory and Public Life, ed. J. Forester.Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
22.
Forester, J.1989. Planning in the Face of PowerBerkeley : University of California Press.
23.
Forester, J.1991. On critical practice: The politics of story telling and the priority of practical judgment. The Clarkson Lecture, State University of New York at Buffalo.
24.
Forester, J.1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice. Toward a Critical PragmatismAlbany: State University of New York Press.
25.
Franks, O.1947. Central Planning and Control in War and Peace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
26.
Freire, P.1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York : Herder and Herder.
27.
Fried, R.1971. Planning the Eternal City: Roman Politics and Planning Since World War IINew Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
28.
Friedmann, J.1957. Planning progress and social values. Diogenes17:98-111.
29.
Friedmann, J.1959. Introdução ao Planejamento DemocráticoRio de Janeiro: Fundaçáo Getúlio Vargas .
30.
Friedmann, J.1965. Venezuela: From Doctrine to Dialogue Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
31.
Friedmann, J.1969. Notes on societal action. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35:311-318.
32.
Fnedmann, J.1971. The future of comprehensive planning. Public Administration Review31:315-326.
33.
Friedmann, J.1973. Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning . Garden City, New York: Anchor .
Friedmann, J.1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
36.
Friedmann, J.1992. Empowerment. The Politics of Alternative DevelopmentBoston, Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
37.
Friedmann, J. and G. Abonyi.1976. Social learning: A new model for policy research. Environment and Planning A 8:927-940.
38.
Gross, B. M., ed. 1967. Action Under Planning The Guidance of Economic Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Harper, T.L. , and S.M. Stem.1992. The centrality of normative ethical theory to contemporary planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:105-116.
40.
Heskin, A.D.1991. The Struggle for Community Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
41.
Hirschman, A.O.1963. Journeys Towards Progress: Studies of Economic Policy Making in Latin America. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
42.
Hoch, C.J.1992. The paradox of power in planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:206-215.
43.
Hoffman, L.M.1989. The Politics of Knowledge. Activist Movements in Medicine and PlanningAlbany: The State University of New York Press.
44.
Horton, M., and P. Freire.1990. In We Make the Road by Walking, eds. B. Bell, J. Gaventa, and J. Peters.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press .
45.
Keane, J.1988. Democracy and Civil SocietyLondon : Verso.
46.
Klosterman, R.E.1981. Contemporary planning theory education: Results of a course survey. Journal of Planning Education and Research1:1-11.
47.
Klosterman, R.E.1992. Planning theory education in the 1980s: Results of a second course survey. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:130-140.
48.
Krumholz, N., and J. Forester1990. Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.
49.
Lindblom, C.1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: The Free Press.
50.
Lmdblom, C.E.1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books .
51.
Mannheim, K. [1935] 1948. Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.
52.
Mannheim, K. [1929] 1949. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.
53.
Marris, P.1982. Community Planning and Conceptions of Change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
54.
Meyerson M., and E.C. Banfield1955. Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest The Case of Public Housing in Chicago. New York: Free Press.
55.
Milroy, B.M.1991. Into postmodern weightlessness. Journal of Planning Education and Research10:181-188.
56.
Padilla, S. M., ed. 1975. Tugwell'sThoughts on Planning. Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico Press .
57.
Pateman, C.1970. Participation and Democratic TheoryCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Phillips, A.1991. Engendering Democracy. University Park : The Pennsylvania State University Press.
59.
Rabinovitz, F.1969. City Politics and Planning. New York : Atherton Press.
60.
Rittel, H.W., and M.M. Webber.1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences4:155-169.
61.
Sandercock, L.1995. Voices from the borderlands: A meditation on a metaphor . Journal of Planning Education and Research14:77-88.
62.
Sandercock, L., and A. Forsyth1990. Gender: A New Agenda for Planning Theory. Working Paper 521. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
63.
Schon, D.A.1971. Beyond the Stable State. New York: W.W. Norton.
64.
Schon, D.A.1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
65.
Simon, H. [1945] 1976. Administrative Behavior3rd. ed. New York: The Free Press.
66.
Starr, A., and C. Lee.1992. Indigenous planning: Paradigm and curriculum for relevance to communities of color. Unpublished manuscript.
67.
Throgmorton, J.A.1991. The rhetoncs of policy analysis. Policy Sciences24:151-179.
68.
Throgmorton, J.A.1992. Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois. Journal of Planning Education and Research12:17-31.
69.
Throgmorton, J.A.1993. Planning as a rhetorical activity: Survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal of the American Planning Association59:334-346.