Barzel, Y., and E. Silberberg.1973. Is the act of voting rational? Public Choice16:51-58.
2.
Black, A.1993. The recent popularity of light rail transit in North America . Journal of Planning Education and Research12:150-159.
3.
Browning, E.K.1989. Inequality and poverty. Southern Economic Journal55:819-830.
4.
Gomez-Ibanez, J.A.1985. A dark side to light rail? Journal of the American Planning Association51:337-351.
5.
Gordon P., H.W. Richardson, and H.L. Wong.1986. The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A18:161-173.
6.
Gordon P., and H.W. Richardson .1989. Notes form the underground: The failure of urban mass transit. The Public Interest94:77-86.
7.
Gordon P., and H.W. Richardson .1991. Why local policies fail . Working Paper. University of Southern California, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Los Angeles.
8.
Gordon P., and H.W. Richardson .1993. Sustainable congestion . Working Paper, University of Southern California, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Los Angeles.
9.
Gordon P., and R. Willson.1985. The determinants of fixed-rail transit demand—an international cross-sectional comparison. In International Railway Economics, eds. K. Button and D. E. Pitfield.Hans, England: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.
10.
Hilton, G.W.1967. Rail transit and the pattern of cities: The California case. Traffic Quarterly3:379-393.
11.
Hilton, G.W.1974. Federal Transit Subsidies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
12.
Kain, J.1988. Choosing the wrong technology: Or how to spend billions and reduce transit use. Journal of Advanced Transportation21:197-213.
13.
Kain, J.1990. Deception in Dallas: Strategic misrepresentation in rail transit promotion and evaluation. Journal of the American Planning Assoctation56:184-196.
14.
Kelly J.1990. National Transportation Statistics Annual Report, 1990 . U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration report DOT-TSC-RSPA-90-2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Kelman, S.1987. Public choice and public spirit. Public Interest87:80-94.
16.
Los Angeles County Transportation Commission.1980. An ordinance establishing a retail transactions and use tax in the county of Los Angeles for public transit purposes. Ballot Proposition A, Los Angeles County.
17.
Los Angeles County Transportation Commission.1990. An ordinance establishing a retail transactions and use tax in the county of Los Angeles for public transit purposes. Ballot Proposition C, Los Angeles County.
18.
Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, Capital Planning and Programming Section. 1992. 30-year Integrated Transportation Plan. Los Angeles, California.
19.
Meyer, J.R., J.F. Kain, and M. Wohl.1965. The Urban Transportation Problem. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press .
20.
Pickrell, D.H.1989. Urban Rail Transit Projects: Forecast vs. Actual Ridership and Costs. U.S. Department of Transportation , Urban Mass Transportation Administration report. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office .
21.
Pickrell, D.H.1992. A desire named streetcar. Journal of the American Planning Association58:158-176.
22.
Pisarski, A.E.1987. Commuting in America. A National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Westport, Connecticut: Eno Foundation for Transportation.
23.
Pisarski, A.E.1992. Travel Behavior Issues in the 90's. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration report, Office of Highway Information Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office
24.
Richmond, J.E.D.1991. Transport of Delight—The Mythical Conception of Rail Transit in Los Angeles. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
25.
Wachs, M.1986. Technique vs. advocacy in forecasting: A study of rapid rail transit. Urban Resources4:23-30.
26.
Wachs, M.1989. U.S. transit subsidy policy: In need of reform . Science244:1545-1549.
27.
Wolfe, C., Jr. 1979. A theory of non-market failures. Public Interest55:114-133.