The use of discourse theory as a tool for critical analysis has been ex plored by several planning theorists. Two understandings of discourse can be identified in planning literature: the understanding derived from Ha bermas's critical theory which has been adapted for planners by John Forester, and the understanding based on Foucault's work which has been employed by Christine Boyer. Brief summaries of these two tradi tions are followed by a reading of planners' own major discourse — the city plan — in order to identify some of its enduring discursive traits. The significance of these traits is then discussed in terms of some of the key tenets of current postmodern theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakhtin, M., and Volosinov, V.N.1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. London: Seminar Press.
2.
Barthes, R.1972. Mythologies. Trans. Annette LaversNew York: Hill and Wang.
3.
Boyer, C.1983. Dreaming the Rational City. Cambridge : MIT Press.
4.
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F.1977. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking Press.
5.
Foester, J.1985. Critical theory and planning practice. In Critical Theory and Public Life, ed. J. Forester.Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
Foucault, M.1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language . New York: Random House .
7.
—. 1979. What is an author? In Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. Josué V. Harari.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 141-160.
8.
Habermas, J.1979. What is universal pragmatics? In Communication and the Evolution of Society. ed. J. Habermas. Trans. and with an intro. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston : Beacon Press. 1-68, 208-219.
9.
—. 1983. Modernity — an incomplete project. In The Anti-Aesthetic : Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster.Port Townsend: Bay Press.
10.
—. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society . Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
11.
Halifax1984. Municipal Development Plan for the City of Halifax. Halifax : City of Halifax.
12.
Kress, G., and Hodge, R.1979. Language as Ideology. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
13.
Lyotard, J-F.1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . Trans. Brian Massumi and Geoff Bennington. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Montréal1985. Résumé de la version définitive du schéma d'aménagement/Summary of the Final Version of the Development Plan . Montréal: Communauté Urbaine de Montréal, La Commission d'aménagement.
15.
Moore Milroy, B.1989. Constructing and deconstructing plausibility. Society and Space7(3):313-326.
16.
Pêcheux, M.1982. Language, Semantics and Ideology: Stating the Obvious. Trans. Harbans Nagpal. London: Macmillan.
17.
Quéré, L.1982. Des miroirs équivoques: Aux origines de la communication moderne. Paris: Editions Aubier Montaigne.
18.
Reade, E.J.1985. An analysis of the use of the concept of rationality in the literature of planning. In Rationality and Planning: Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning, eds. M. Breheny and A. Hooper.London: Pion Ltd. , 77-97.
19.
Toronto 1963. Plan for Downtown Toronto. Toronto : City of Toronto Planning Board.
20.
—. 1977. Preliminary Neighborhood Plan: King-Parliament . Toronto : City of Toronto Planning Board.
