Abstract
This paper begins to formalize a conception of maturity and leadership in the planning academy. Building on a pair of seminal papers by Krueckeberg (1984, 1985) and recent literature on academic unit leadership, this paper presents a descriptive and analytic overview of the planning academy and compares and contrasts leadership in planning education units against a situational model of academic leadership. The paper concludes with an agenda of possible research and programmatic directions designed to advance the intellectual field of planning thereby enhancing its institutional maturity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
