The authors have examined the inadequate attention currently being paid to small group process by planning educators as well as the possible reasons for this situation. A case has then been made for a stronger presence for small group process in planning education. In addition, a detailed outline of small group content is presented along with some ways of teaching this content in planning schools. The authors conclude by stressing their belief that increased attention to small group process will substantially strengthen planning education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abercrombie, M.L.J. and Terry, P.M.1978. Talking to Learn: Improving Teaching and Learnmg in Small Groups. Society for Research into Higher Education, Ltd. University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, England. May 1978.
2.
Argyns, C. and Schon, D.A.1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Argyris, C.1975. Learning Environments for Increased Effectiveness. In Theories of Group Process, ed., C. L. Cooper.New York: Wiley .
4.
Ash, P.1982. Working with Small Groups. In The Planner's Use of Information, ed., H.C. Dandekar.Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross.
5.
Beauregard, R.1981. The Alienation of Planning Students. Paper presented at the 1981 Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference. Washington, D.C. October 22-25.
6.
Benne, K.D. and Sheats, P.1948. Functional Roles of Group Members. Journal of Social Issues. 4 (2):41 -49.
7.
Bolan, R.1969. Community Decision Behavior: The Culture of Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners.35(5):301-310.
8.
_. 1980. The Practitioner as Theorist: The Phenomenology of the Professional Episode. Journal of the Amencan Planning Association . 46(3).261-274.
9.
Bouton, C. and Garth, R.Y. , eds. 1983Learning in Groups. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
10.
Bormann, E. and Bormann, N.1980. Effective Small Group Communication, 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing.
11.
Bradford, L.P.; Stock, D.; and Horowitz, M.1978. How to Diagnose Group Problems. In Group Development, 2nd ed., ed., L.P. Bradford.La Jolla, CA: University Associates.
12.
Bryson, J.M. and Delbecq, A.L.1979. A Contingent Approach to Strategy and Tactics in Project Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. 45(2):167-179.
13.
Cathcart, R.S. and Samovar, L.A.1984. Small Group Communication: A Reader, 4th ed. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown .
14.
Collier, G., ed. 1983. The Management of Peer-Group Learning. Guildford, Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education.
15.
Colman, A.D. and Bexton, W. H., eds. 1975. Group Relations Reader. Sausalito, CA: GREX.
16.
Crow, M.L.1980. Teaching as an Interactive Process New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
17.
Deutsch, K.1963The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.
18.
Friedmann, J.1973. Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Plannmg. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press.
19.
Hare, A.P.1976. Handbook of Small Group Research, 2nd ed. New York. The Free Press .
20.
Hartford, M.E.1971. Groups in Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Henry, S.1981. Group Skills in Social Work: A Four-Dimensional Approach . Itasca, IL: F.E. Reacock.
22.
Heskin, A.D.1978. From Theory to Practice: Professional Development at UCLA . Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 44(4).436-451.
23.
Hudson, B.M.1979. Comparison of Current Planning Theories Counterparts and Contradictions. Journal of the American Planning Association.45(4):387-398.
24.
Jacobsen, L., Ranney, D.C., Logan, T.H.; Hollard, R.; and Powers, S.The Wisconsin Omnibus Experiment. Journal of the Amencan Institute of Planners. 36(4):253-260.
25.
Kemp, G.O., Jr. 1977. Three Factors of Success. In Relating Work and Education, ed., D.W. Vermilye.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Kreeger, L.1975. The Large Group. London: Constable.
27.
Lawrence, D.1981. Contextual Planning: Linking the Process to the Context . Working Paper No 7. School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo.
28.
Lawrence, W.G., ed. 1979. Exploring Individual and Organisational BoundariesNew York: John Wiley.
29.
Michael, D.N.1974. Speculations on Future Planning Process Theory In Planning in Amenca: Learnmg from Turbulence, ed., D.R. Godschalk.Washington, D.C.. American Institute of Planners.
30.
Mills, T.M.1979. Changing Paradigms for Studying Human Groups. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences.15(3):407-423.
31.
_. 1984. The Sociology of Small Groups, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall .
32.
Nixon, H.H.1979. The Small Group. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall.
33.
Nutt, T.E., Susskind, L.E.; with Retsinas, N.P.1970. Prospects for Urban Planning Education. Journal of the American Institute of Planners36(4):229-241.
34.
Parsons, T., Bales, R.F.; and Shils, E.A.1953. Workmg Papers in the Theory of Action. New York: The Free Press.
35.
Patton, B.R. and Giffin, K.1979. Decision-Makmg Group Interaction, 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row .
36.
Rein, M. and White, S.H.1981. Knowledge for Practice. Social Service Review.55(1):1-41
37.
Rice, A.K.1965. Learning for Leadership— Inter-Personal and Inter-Group Relations. London: Tavistock Publications .
38.
Rich, W. with Geiser, K.; Goetz, R.; and Hollister, R.1970. Holding Together: Four Years of Evolution at MIT. Journal of the American Institute of Planners.36(4):242-252.
39.
Rudduck, J.1976. Small Group Learning and Teaching. In Small Group Teaching: Selected Papers A Report by the Group for Research and Innovation in Higher Education, May 1976. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
40.
Schein, E.H.1969. Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development . Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley .
41.
_. 1972. Professional Education: Some New Directions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Schon, D.A. and Nutt, T.E.1974. Endemic Turbulence: The Future for Planning Education . In Planning in America: Learning from Turbulence, ed., D. R . Godschalk.Washington, D.C.. American Institute of Planners.
43.
Selltiz, C.; Jahoda, M.; Deutsch, M.; and Cook, S.W.Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44.
Shalinsky, W.1970. The Small Group in Education. Canadian University and College. 5(4):56-7, 61, 65.
45.
. 1977. Small Groups in the Planning and Policy Fields. Journal of Urban and Environmental Affairs.9(3):156-183.
46.
and Norris, R.G.1985. The Relationship Between Group Composition and Productivity in Student Project Groups. Unpublished report
47.
Tomey, E.J.1978. Teaching Planning Students to Communicate The Bulletin of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. 16(3):5-6.
