Just as Justice Brandeis viewed states as laboratories of social experimentation, so can citites serve as working models of dif ferent urban policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, R. Jr.1976. Radicals in Urban Politics: The Alinsky Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Brugmann, B. and Sletteland, G.1971. The Ultimate Highrise. San Francisco : Guardian Books.
3.
Domhoff, G.W.1978. Who Really Rules? Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Co.
4.
Georgakas, D. and Surkin, M.1975. Detroit: I Do Mind Dying. New York : St. Martin's Press.
5.
Goodman, R.1972. After The Planners. New York: Simon and Schuster.
6.
Gross, B. February, 1982. Some Anticrime Proposals For Progressives . The Nation.
7.
Kohfield, C.W., Salent, B. and Schoenberg, S.1981. Neighborhoods and Urban Crime. Journal of Community A ction.
8.
Marschall, D.1979. The Battle of Cleveland: Public Interest Challenges Corporate Power. Washington, D.C.: Conference on Alternative State and Local Policies.
9.
Molotch, H.1971. The City As A Growth Machine. American Journal of Sociology.
10.
Mollenkopf, J.1978. The Post-War Politics of Urban Development. In Marxism and the Metropolis, eds., W.K. Tabb and L. Sawers.New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Nathan, H. and Scott, S.1978. Experiment and Change in Berkeley: Essays on City Politics 1950-1975. Berkeley: Institute of Government Studies, University of California.
12.
Rich, R. July, 1979. Neighborhood Governance Programs of the 1970s . Neighborhood Organization Research News Bulletin.
