Few studies assess methods for teaching students how to evaluate plans. To fill this gap, we designed and analyzed a plan assessment exercise conducted during a ten-week, online undergraduate course with ninety students. We find that student understanding of plan knowledge and skills increased significantly after the plan assessment exercise with students reporting increased interest to engage in planning. This study can be used to inform planning pedagogy both within planning programs and as planners engage the public in plan reading and evaluation.
BaerC. W.1997. “General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association63 (3): 329–44.
5.
BalsasC.2012. “What About Plan Evaluation? Integrating Evaluation in Urban Planning Studio’s Pedagogy.” Planning Practice and Research27 (4): 475–94.
6.
BanginwarA.AntonioD.LopezM.PoirierL.GhoshS.DettmannM.BrinkleyC.2023. “General Plan Database Mapping Tool (v3. 0). Zenodo.” doi:10.5281/zenodo.7508689.
7.
BerkeP.GodschalkD.2009. “Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Plan Quality Studies.” Journal of Planning Literature23 (3): 227–40.
8.
BerkeP.KatesJ.MalechaM.MastersonJ.SheaP.YuS.2021. “Using a Resilience Scorecard to Improve Local Planning for Vulnerability to Hazards and Climate Change: An Application in Two Cities.” Cities119:103408.
9.
BerkeP. R.ConroyM. M.2000. “Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? An Evaluation of 30 Comprehensive Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 21–33.
10.
BerkeP. R.FrenchS. P.1994. “The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 237–50.
11.
BerkeP. R.GodschalkD. R.KaiserE. J.RodriguezD. A.2006. Urban Land Use Planning. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
12.
BerkeP. R.MatthewM. L.YuS.LeeJMastersonJ. H.2019. “Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: Evaluating Networks of Plans in six US Coastal Cities.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management62 (5): 901–20.
13.
BrinkleyC.WagnerJ.2024. “Who Is Planning for Environmental Justice—and How?”Journal of the American Planning Association90 (1): 63–76.
14.
BrodyS. D.GodschalkD. R.BurbyR. J.2003. “Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices.” Journal of the American Planning Association69 (3): 245–64. 10.1080/01944360308978018.
15.
BunnellG.JepsonE. R.Jr.2011. “The Effect of Mandated Planning on Plan Quality: A Fresh Look at What Makes “a Good Plan.” Journal of the American Planning Association77 (4): 338–53.
16.
BurbyR.DaltonL.1994. “Plans Can Matter! The Role of Land Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas.” Public Administration Review54 (3): 229–38. doi:10.2307/976725.
17.
BurbyR. J.2003. “Making Plans That Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action.” Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 33–49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292.
ChittumJ. R.EnkeK. A.FinleyA. P.2022. “The Effects of Community-Based and Civic Engagement in Higher Education: What We Know and Questions That Remain.” American Association of Colleges and Universities.
20.
ConroyM. M.BerkeP. R.2004. “What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development.” Environment and Planning A36 (8): 1381–96.
21.
DaltonL.2007. “Preparing Planners for the Breadth of Practice: What We Need to Know Depends on Whom We Ask.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (1): 35–48. doi:10.1080/01944360708976135.
22.
DasP.TadjY.CloudwatcherS.Ho-ScharC.2020. “Future Planning Practitioners and the “Waipahu Talk Story”: Learning from and Reflecting on Participation.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X20954536.
23.
DongS.LiQ.FarahmandH.MostafaviA.BerkeP. R.VedlitzA.2020. “Institutional Connectedness in Resilience Planning and Management of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems.” Journal of Management in Engineering36 (6).
24.
Fox-RogersL.MurphyE.2016. “Self-Perceptions of the Role of the Planner.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43 (1): 74–92.
25.
FuX.2024. “Natural Language Processing in Urban Planning: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Planning Literature39 (9), 395–407.
26.
FuX.WangR.LiC.2024. “Can ChatGPT Evaluate Plans?”Journal of the American Planning Association90 (3): 525–36.
27.
GuyadeenD.SeasonsM.2016. “Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research.” Planning Practice & Research31 (2): 215–28.
28.
HattieJ.TimperleyH.2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research77 (1): 81–112.
29.
HudsonT. D.MeansD. R.TishE.2020. “Discovering My Agency: Exploring how Youth Participatory Action Research Facilitates the Development of Capital by Underserved Youth in a College Access Program.” Teachers College Record122 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1177/016146812012200109.
KaczmarekI.IwaniakA.ŚwietlickaA.PiwowarczykM.NadolnyA.2022. “A Machine Learning Approach for Integration of Spatial Development Plans Based on Natural Language Processing.” Sustainable Cities and Society76:103479.
32.
KhakeeA.2000. “Reading Plans as an Exercise in Evaluation.” Evaluation6 (2): 119–36.
33.
KingC. S.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O.1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review58 (4): 317–26.
34.
KinzerK.2016. “Missed Connections: A Critical Analysis of Interconnections Between Public Participation and Plan Implementation Literature.” Journal of Planning Literature31 (3): 299–316.
35.
KnaapG. J.DingC.HopkinsL. D.2001. “Do Plans Matter? The Effects of Light Rail Plans on Land Values in Station Areas.” Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (1): 32–39. doi:10.1177/0739456X0102100103.
36.
KnaapG. J.HopkinsL. D.DonaghyK. P.1998. “Do Plans Matter? A Game-Theoretic Model for Examining the Logic and Effects of Land Use Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (1): 25–34.
37.
LauriaM.LongM.2017. “Planning Experience and Planners’ Ethics.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (2): 202–20.
38.
LauriaM.SlotterbackC. S.2020. Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder: From Citizen Participation to Public Engagement. New York: Routledge.
39.
LaurianL.CrawfordJ.DayM.KouwenhovenP.MasonG.EricksenN.BeattieL.2010. “Evaluating the Outcomes of Plans: Theory, Practice, and Methodology.” Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design37 (4): 740.
40.
LiQ.RoyM.MostafaviA.BerkeP.2021. “A Plan Evaluation Framework for Examining Stakeholder Policy Preferences in Resilience Planning and Management of Urban Systems.” Environmental Science & Policy124:125–34.
41.
LiaoL.WarnerM. E.HomsyG. C.2020. “When Do Plans Matter? Tracking Changes in Local Government Sustainability Actions from 2010 to 2015.” Journal of the American Planning Association86 (1): 60–74.
42.
LohC. G.KimR.2021. “Are We Planning for Equity? Equity Goals and Recommendations in Local Comprehensive Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association87 (2): 181–96.
43.
LylesW.StevensM.2014. “Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and Contributions, Limitations, and New Directions.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (4): 433–50.
44.
MandelbaumS. J.1990. “Reading Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association56 (3): 350–58.
45.
Millard-BallA.2013. “The Limits to Planning: Causal Impacts of City Climate Action Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (1): 5–19.
46.
MorganE. D.OsborneN.MackeyB.2022. “Evaluating Planning Without Plans: Principles, Criteria and Indicators for Effective Forest Landscape Approaches.” Land Use Policy115:106031.
47.
MuiY.KhojastehMJudelsohnASirwatkaAKellySGoochPRajaS. 2021. “Planning for Regional Food Equity.” Journal of the American Planning Association87 (3): 354–69. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1845781.
48.
NothF.TonzerL.2022. “Understanding Climate Activism: Who Participates in Climate Marches such as “Fridays for Future” and What Can We Learn from It?”Energy Research & Social Science84:102360.
49.
PadtF. J. G.BoseM.LuloffA. E.2023. “Teaching Public Engagement in Research Using the Engagement Tool.” Journal of Planning Education and Research43 (4): 766–72.
PeelD.2000. “The Teacher and Town Planner as Facilitator.” Innovations in Education and Training International37 (4): 372–80.
52.
PoirierL.AntonioD.DettmannM.EngT.GanataJ.GhoshS.LopezM.KarmaS.NatekalA.BrinkleyC.2024. “Making Plans Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable With Data Infrastructure: A Search Engine for Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Planning Documents.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science51 (8): 1913–30.
53.
QuickK. S.FeldmanM. S.2011. “Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (3): 272–90. doi:10.1177/0739456X11410979.
54.
ReckienD.SalviaM.HeidrichO.ChurchJ. M.PietrapertosaF.De Gregorio-HurtadoS.D’AlonzoV.FoleyA.SimoesS. G.LorencováE. K., et al2018. “How Are Cities Planning to Respond to Climate Change? Assessment of Local Climate Plans from 885 cities in the EU-28.” Journal of Cleaner Production191:207–19.
55.
RyanB. D.2011. “Reading Through a Plan: A Visual Interpretation of What Plans Mean and How They Innovate.” Journal of the American Planning Association77 (4): 309–27.
56.
SeltzerE.OzawaC. P.2002. “Clear Signals: Moving on to Planning’s Promise.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (1): 77–86.
57.
SteinbergF.2018. Promoting Food Security for UC Davis Students: Report and Recommendations of the Chancellor’s Task Force on Student Food Security. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.
58.
SusskindL.CunninghamD.CruxênA. I.2018. “Teaching Participatory Action Research: The Search for Pedagogical Insights.” In Participatory Action Research, edited by CalderJ.FolettaJ., 125–150. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
59.
TalenE.1996. “Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature10 (3): 248–59.
60.
YuS.BrandA. D.BerkeP.2020. “Making Room for the River: Applying a Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard to a Network of Plans in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.” Journal of the American Planning Association86 (4): 417–30.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
