As part of their efforts to reverse the effects of twentieth-century downtown disinvestment and automobile-oriented development, stakeholders in small towns across the United States look for viable means of restoring the vitality and character of their historic business districts. In this paper, I evaluate a widely adopted downtown revitalization strategy—the Main Street Program—by measuring its influence on the local housing market. I find that home sale prices are higher for residential properties sold in program-participating communities, and I observe an additional sale price premium for homes located in closer proximity to downtown districts with an active Main Street Program.
AbbottCarl. 1993. “Five Downtown Strategies: Policy Discourse and Downtown Planning since 1945.”Journal of Policy History5 (1): 5–27.
2.
AhlfeldtGabriel M.MaennigWolfgang. 2010. “Substitutability and Complementarity of Urban Amenities: External Effects of Built Heritage in Berlin.”Real Estate Economics38 (2): 285–323.
3.
AldrichLornaBealeCalvinKasselKathleen. 1997. “Commuting and the Economic Functions of Small Towns and Places.”Rural America/Rural Development Perspectives12 (2221-2019–2641): 26–31.
4.
AlexanderErnest R.FaludiAndreas. 1989. “Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria.”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design16 (2): 127–40.
5.
AltermanRachelleCarmonNaomiHillMoshe. 1984. “Integrated Evaluation: A Synthesis of Approaches to the Evaluation of Broad-Aim Social Programs.”Socio-economic Planning Sciences18 (6): 381–89.
6.
AngelShlomo. 2012. Planet of Cities. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
7.
AnthonyJerry. 2018. “Economic Prosperity and Housing Affordability in the United States: Lessons from the Booming 1990s.”Housing Policy Debate28 (3): 325–41.
8.
AsaberePaul K.HuffmanForrest E.MehdianSeyed. 1994. “The Adverse Impacts of Local Historic Designation: The Case of Small Apartment Buildings in Philadelphia.”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics8 (3): 225–34.
9.
AydinRecaiCrawfordEvertSmithBarton A.2011. “Commercial Development Spillover Effects Upon Residential Values.”Southwestern Economic Review37:47–62.
10.
BartikTimothy J.2020. “Using Place-Based Jobs Policies to Help Distressed Communities.”Journal of Economic Perspectives34 (3): 99–127.
11.
BaumHowell S.2001. “How Should We Evaluate Community Initiatives?”Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 147–58.
12.
BeenVickiEllenIngrid GouldGedalMichaelGlaeserEdward L.McCabeBrian J.2016. “Preserving History or Restricting Development? The Heterogeneous Effects of Historic Districts on Local Housing Markets in New York City.”Journal of Urban Economics92:16–30.
13.
BoltonRoger. 1992. “‘Place Prosperity vs People Prosperity’ Revisited: An Old Issue with a New Angle.”Urban Studies29 (2): 185–203.
14.
BradburyKatharine L.DownsAnthonySmallKenneth A.1982. Urban Decline and the Future of American Cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
15.
BradburySusan L.2011. “An Evaluation of Iowa’s Rural Main Street Program.”Journal of Rural and Community Development6 (2). file:///C:/Users/Evans/Downloads/jrcd-jrcd-2010-462%20(1).pdf.
BruecknerJan K.ThisseJacques-FrancoisZenouYves. 1999. “Why Is Central Paris Rich and Downtown Detroit Poor? An Amenity-Based Theory.”European Economic Review43 (1): 91–107.
CoulsonN. EdwardLahrMichael L.2005. “Gracing the Land of Elvis and Beale Street: Historic Designation and Property Values in Memphis.”Real Estate Economics33 (3): 487–507.
20.
DownsAnthony. 1999. “Some Realities about Sprawl and Urban Decline.”Housing Policy Debate10 (4): 955–74.
21.
DuanyAndresPlater-ZyberkElizabethSpeckJeff. 2001. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.
22.
FaulkDagney. 2006. “The Process and Practice of Downtown Revitalization.”Review of Policy Research23 (2): 625–45.
23.
FilionPierreHoernigHeidiBuntingTrudiSandsGary. 2004. “The Successful Few: Healthy Downtowns of Small Metropolitan Regions.”Journal of the American Planning Association70 (3): 328–43.
FlyvbjergBent. 2014. “What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview.” Project Management Journal45 (2): 6–19.
26.
FordDeborah Ann. 1989. “The Effect of Historic District Designation on Single-Family Home Prices.”Real Estate Economics17 (3): 353–62.
27.
FrankKathryn I.HibbardMichael. 2017. “Rural Planning in the Twenty-First Century: Context-Appropriate Practices in a Connected World.”Journal of Planning Education and Research37 (3): 299–308.
28.
FrankLawrence D.MayaudJeromeHongAndyFisherPatKershawSuzanne. 2019. “Unmet Demand for Walkable Transit-Oriented Neighborhoods in a Midsized Canadian Community: Market and Planning Implications.”Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X19831064.
29.
Federal Reserve Economic Data. 2020. “Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items.” St. Louis Federal Reserve Economic Data. 2020.”https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL.
30.
GalsterGeorgeHansonRoyceRatcliffeMichael R.WolmanHaroldColemanStephenFreihageJason. 2001. “Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept.”Housing Policy Debate12 (4): 681–717.
31.
GlaeserEdward L.GottliebJoshua D.2006. “Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City.”Urban Studies43 (8): 1275–99.
32.
GoldingShaun A.2016. “Gentrification and Segregated Wealth in Rural America: Home Value Sorting in Destination Counties.”Population Research and Policy Review35 (1): 127–46.
33.
HamidiShimaEwingReidPreussIlanaDoddsAlex. 2015. “Measuring Sprawl and Its Impacts: An Update.”Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (1): 35–50.
34.
HibbardMichaelLurieSusan. 2019. “If Your Rural Community Is Failing, Just Leave? The Revival of Place Prosperity in Rural Development Planning.”Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X19895319.
HowiePeterMurphySean M.WicksJohn. 2010. “An Application of a Stated Preference Method to Value Urban Amenities.”Urban Studies47 (2): 235–56.
37.
HuhSerimKwakSeung-Jun. 1997. “The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul.”Urban Studies34 (7): 989–98.
38.
JacobsJane.1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
39.
JammeHuê-Tâm WebbBahlDeepakBanerjeeTridib. 2018. “Between ‘Broken Windows’ and the ‘Eyes on the Street’: Walking to School in Inner City San Diego.”Journal of Environmental Psychology55:121–38.
40.
Kelly-SchwartzAlexia C.StockardJeanDoyleScottSchlossbergMarc. 2004. “Is Sprawl Unhealthy? A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship of Metropolitan Sprawl to the Health of Individuals.”Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (2): 184–96.
41.
KiChiu OnJayanthaWadu Mesthrige. 2010. “The Effects of Urban Redevelopment on Neighbourhood Housing Prices.”International Journal of Urban Sciences14 (3): 276–94.
KunstlerJames Howard.1994. The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44.
LeichenkoRobin M.CoulsonN. EdwardListokinDavid. 2001. “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: An Analysis of Texas Cities.”Urban Studies38 (11): 1973–87.
45.
LiWeiJohKennethLeeChanamKimJun-HyunParkHanWooAyoung. 2015. “Assessing Benefits of Neighborhood Walkability to Single-Family Property Values: A Spatial Hedonic Study in Austin, Texas.”Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (4): 471–88.
46.
ListokinDavidListokinBarbaraLahrMichael. 1998. “The Contributions of Historic Preservation to Housing and Economic Development.”Housing Policy Debate9 (3): 431–478.
47.
MadsenRoJean. 1983. “Use of Evaluation Research Methods in Planning and Policy Contexts.”Journal of Planning Education and Research2 (2): 113–21.
48.
McCabeBrian J.EllenIngrid Gould. 2016. “Does Preservation Accelerate Neighborhood Change? Examining the Impact of Historic Preservation in New York City.”Journal of the American Planning Association82 (2): 134–46.
49.
MillerNormanPengLiangSklarzMichael. 2011. “House Prices and Economic Growth.”The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics42 (4): 522–41.
50.
MyersDowellGearinElizabeth. 2001. “Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments.”Housing Policy Debate12 (4): 633–659.
51.
NeumarkDavidSimpsonHelen. 2015. “Place-Based Policies.” In G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson & W. C. Strange (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 5, 1197–1287. Elsevier.
52.
NoonanDouglas S.2007. “Finding an Impact of Preservation Policies: Price Effects of Historic Landmarks on Attached Homes in Chicago, 1990-1999.”Economic Development Quarterly21 (1): 17–33.
53.
OldenburgRamonBrissettDennis. 1982. “The Third Place.”Qualitative Sociology5 (4): 265–84.
54.
OrvellMiles.2012. The Death and Life of Main Street: Small Towns in American Memory, Space, and Community. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press Books.
55.
PivoGaryFisherJeffrey D.2011. “The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments.”Real Estate Economics39 (2): 185–219.
56.
RąckaIzabelaPalickiSławomirKrajewskaMałgorzataSzopińskaKingaKempaOlgierd. 2017. “Changes On the Housing Market of the Downtown Area in Selected Polish Cities.”Real Estate Management and Valuation25 (2): 79–90.
57.
RauterkusStephanie YatesMillerNorman. 2011. “Residential Land Values and Walkability.”Journal of Sustainable Real Estate3 (1): 23–43.
58.
RobertsonKent A.1993. “Pedestrianization Strategies for Downtown Planners: Skywalks versus Pedestrian Malls.”Journal of the American Planning Association59 (3): 361–70.
59.
RobertsonKent A.1995. “Downtown Redevelopment Strategies in the United States: An End-of-the-Century Assessment.”Journal of the American Planning Association61 (4): 429–37.
60.
RobertsonKent A.1999. “Can Small-City Downtowns Remain Viable? A National Study of Development Issues and Strategies.”Journal of the American Planning Association65 (3): 270–83.
61.
RobertsonKent A.2004. “The Main Street Approach to Downtown Development: An Examination of the Four-Point Program.”Journal of Architectural and Planning Research21 (21): 55–731.
62.
RothenbergJeromeGalsterGeorge C.ButlerRichard V.PitkinJohn R.1991. The Maze of Urban Housing Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Ryberg-WebsterStephanieKinahanKelly L.2014. “Historic Preservation and Urban Revitalization in the Twenty-First Century.”Journal of Planning Literature29 (2): 119–39.
64.
RypkemaDonovan D.2003. “The Importance of Downtown in the 21st Century.”Journal of the American Planning Association69 (1): 9–15.
65.
SchaefferPeter V.MillerickCecily Ahern. 1991. “The Impact of Historic District Designation on Property Values: An Empirical Study.”Economic Development Quarterly5 (4): 301–12.
66.
SeasonsMark. 2003. “Indicators and Core area Planning: Applications in Canada’s Mid-sized Cities.” Planning Practice & Research18 (1): 63–80.
67.
SohmerRebecca R.LangRobert E.2001. “Downtown Rebound.”Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census2000:163–74.
68.
SongYanKnaapGerrit-Jan. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Mixed Land Uses on Housing Values.”Regional Science and Urban Economics34 (6): 663–80.
69.
SpeckJeff.2013. Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: North Point Press.
70.
SwensonDavidOttoDaniel M.1997. “Rural Housing Market Response to Nonfarm Employment Growth: An Analysis of Housing Development Patterns.”International Journal of Public Administration20 (8–9): 1579–98.
71.
TalenEmily. 1996. “Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning.”Journal of Planning Literature10 (3): 248–59.
72.
TalenEmilyJeongHyesun. 2019. “What Is the Value of ‘Main Street’? Framing and Testing the Arguments.”Cities92:208–18.
73.
Van LeuvenAndrew J.2021. “The Impact of Main Street Revitalization on the Economic Vitality of Small-Town Business Districts.”Economic Development Quarterly (in press).
74.
YinLiZhangHaoPattersonKellySilvermanRobertWuLiang. 2020. “Walkability, Safety, and Housing Values in Shrinking Cities: Spatial Hedonic Study in Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and Detroit.”Journal of Urban Planning and Development146 (3): 04020029.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
