Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-9
How Can We Better Study the Links between Regional Governance and Public Service Outcomes? Governance Topologies in Metropolitan Public Transportation Systems
Metropolitan public transportation systems vary in their performance and governance, and evidence suggests linkages between these. However, such linkages remain largely untested due to the complexity of governance and the absence of reliable and valid measures of it. We develop a conceptual framework for understanding metropolitan public transportation system governance using the familiar concepts of polycentricity and fragmentation. We introduce the novel concept of governance topology to parse the complexity of the many organizational arrangements and interorganizational relationships that comprise metropolitan governance. We then propose a method of measurement using a concentration index, and apply it to the Chicagoland region.
AligicaPaul D.TarkoVlad. 2012. “Polycentricity: from Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond.” Governance25 (2): 237–262.
2.
AnderssonKrister P.OstromElinor. 2008. “Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective.” Policy sciences41 (1): 71–93.
3.
AnsellChrisGashAlison. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18 (4): 543–71.
4.
BerardoRamiroLubellMark. 2019. “The Ecology of Games as a Theory of Polycentricity: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.” Policy Studies Journal47 (1): 6–26.
5.
BerryChristopher. 2008. “Piling on: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal Common-Pool.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 802–20.
6.
BischoffKendra. 2008. “School District Fragmentation and Racial Residential Segregation: How Do Boundaries Matter?.” Urban Affairs Review44 (2): 182–217. doi:10.1177/107808740-8320651.
7.
BishRobert L.WarrenRobert. 1972. “Scale and Monopoly Problems in Urban Government Services.” Urban Affairs Quarterly8 (1): 97–122. doi:10.1177/107808747200800109.
8.
BollensScott A.CavesRoger W.1994. “Counties and Land-Use Regionalism: Models of Growth Governance.” International Journal of Public Administration17 (5): 851–80. doi:10.1080/01900699408524922.
9.
BoyneGeorge A.1996. “Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective.” Urban Studies33 (4–5): 703–21. doi:10.1080/00420989650011799.
10.
BriffaultRichard. 2000. “Localism and Regionalism.” Buffalo Law Review48:1.
11.
BrownJeffrey R.ThompsonGregory L.2008. “Service orientation, bus–rail service integration, and transit performance: examination of 45 US metropolitan areas.” Transportation Research Record2042 (1): 82–89.
12.
BuehlerRalphPucherJohnGerikeRegineGötschiThomas. 2017. “Reducing Car Dependence in the Heart of Europe: Lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.” Transport Reviews37 (1): 4–28. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1177799.
13.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. “Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area.”
14.
CarlisleKeithGrubyRebecca L.2019. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons.” Policy Studies Journal47 (4): 927–52.
15.
CashinSheryll D.1999. “Localism, Self-Interest, and the Tyranny of the Favored Quarter: Addressing the Barriers to New Regionalism.” Georgetown Law Journal88:1985.
16.
ChisholmDonald. 1992. Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
DeHoogRuth HooglandLoweryDavidLyonsWilliam E.1991. “Metropolitan Fragmentation and Suburban Ghettos: Some Empirical Observations on Institutional Racism.” Journal of Urban Affairs13 (4): 479–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1991.tb00268.x.
18.
DeyleRobert E.WiedenmanRyan E.2014. “Collaborative Planning by Metropolitan Planning Organizations: A Test of Causal Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (3): 257–75. doi:10.1177/0739456X14527621.
19.
DolanDrew A.1990. “Local Government Fragmentation: Does It Drive up the Cost of Government?” Urban Affairs Quarterly26 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1177/004208169002600102.
20.
EmersonKirkNabatchiTinaBaloghStephen. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22 (1): 1–29.
21.
FriesemaH. Paul. 1966. “The Metropolis and the Maze of Local Government.” Urban Affairs Quarterly2 (2): 68–90. doi:10.1177/107808746600200205.
22.
GoldmanTodd. 2007. “Transportation Tax Ballot Initiatives as Regional Planning Processes.” Transportation Research Record1997 (1): 9–16. doi:10.3141/1997-02.
23.
GoldmanToddDeakinElizabeth. 2000. “Regionalism through Partnerships? Metropolitan Planning since ISTEA.” Berkeley Planning Journal14 (1): 46–75.
24.
GreerRobert A.ScottTyler A.2020. “A Network Autonomy Framework: Reconceptualizing Special District Autonomy in Polycentric Systems.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance3 (1): 59–76.
25.
HajrasoulihaAmir H.HamidiShima. 2017. “The Typology of the American Metropolis: Monocentricity, Polycentricity, or Generalized Dispersion?.” Urban Geography38 (3): 420–44.
26.
HamiltonDavid K.MillerDavid Y.PaytasJerry. 2004. “Exploring the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of the Governing of Metropolitan Regions.” Urban Affairs Review40 (2): 147–82. doi:10.1177/1078087404268077.
27.
HanssonJoelPetterssonFredrikSvenssonHelenaWretstrandAnders. 2019. “Preferences in Regional Public Transport: A Literature Review.” European Transport Research Review11 (1): 1–16.
28.
HanssonLisa. 2013. “Hybrid Steering Cultures in the Governance of Public Transport: A Successful Way to Meet Demands?” Research in Transportation Economics39 (1): 175–84. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.011.
29.
HatzopoulouMarianneMillerEric J.2008. “Institutional Integration for Sustainable Transportation Policy in Canada.” Transport Policy15 (3): 149–62.
30.
HawleyAmos H.ZimmerBasil. 1970. The Metropolitan Community. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
31.
HeikkilaTanyaWeibleChristopher M.2018. “A semiautomated approach to analyzing polycentricity.” Environmental Policy and Governance28 (4): 308–318.
32.
HendrickRebecca M.JimenezBenedict S.LalKamna. 2011. “Does Local Government Fragmentation Reduce Local Spending?” Urban Affairs Review47 (4): 467–510.
33.
HendrickRebecca M.ShiYu. 2015. “Macro-Level Determinants of Local Government Interaction: How Metropolitan Regions in the United States Compare.” Urban Affairs Review51 (3): 414–38.
34.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Vol. 25. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
HomburgerWolfgang S.VuchicVukan R.1972. “Transit Federation—A Solution for Service Integration.” UITP Revue2:84–91.
36.
HoogheLiesbetMarksGary. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review97 (2): 233–43.
37.
HreljaRobertMoniosJasonRyeTomIsakssonKarolinaScholtenChristina. 2017. “The Interplay of Formal and Informal Institutions between Local and Regional Authorities When Creating Well-Functioning Public Transport Systems.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation11 (8): 611–22. doi:10.1080/15568318.2017.1292374.
38.
HreljaRobertPetterssonFredrikWesterdahlStig. 2016. “The Qualities Needed for a Successful Collaboration: A Contribution to the Conceptual Understanding of Collaboration for Efficient Public Transport.” Sustainability8 (6): 542. doi:10.3390/su8060542.
39.
HuitemaDaveMostertErikEgasWouterMoellenkampSabinePahl-WostlClaudiaYalcinResul. 2009. “Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda.” Ecology and Society14 (1): 26.
40.
IsettKimberley R.MergelInes A.LeRouxKellyMischenPamela A.RethemeyerR. Karl. 2011. “Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21 (Suppl. 1): i157–73.
41.
JimenezBenedict S.2014. “Separate, Unequal, and Ignored? Interjurisdictional Competition and the Budgetary Choices of Poor and Affluent Municipalities.” Public Administration Review74 (2): 246–57. doi:10.1111/puar.12186.
42.
JimenezBenedict S.2016. “Externalities in the Fragmented Metropolis: Local Institutional Choices and the Efficiency–Equity Trade-Off.” The American Review of Public Administration46 (3): 314–36. doi:10.1177/0275074014550703.
43.
LamAmyMillerMark A.2002. “Investigating Institutional Aspects of Multi-Agency Transit Operations-Review of the Literature.” https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5d14h128.
44.
LelandSuzanne M.ThurmaierKurt. 2004. Case Studies of City-County Consolidation: Reshaping the Local Government Landscape. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
LevineJonathanGrengsJoeMerlinLouis A.2019. From Mobility to Accessibility. Cornell University Press.
47.
LevineJonathanInamAseemTorngGwo-Wei. 2005. “A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 317–30.
48.
LevineJonathanParkSoonaeUnderwoodSteven E.WallaceRichard R.1999. “Stakeholder Preferences in Advanced Public Transportation System Planning.” Journal of Public Transportation2 (2): 25–45.
49.
LevinsonDavid M.KingDavid A.2019. A Political Economy of Access: Infrastructure, Networks, Cities, and Institutions. Sydney: Network Design Lab.
50.
LiebermanEvan S.2011. “The Perils of Polycentric Governance of Infectious Disease in South Africa.” Social Science & Medicine73 (5): 676–84.
51.
LineberryRobert L.FowlerEdmund P.1967. “Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities.” American Political Science Review61 (3): 701–16. doi:10.2307/1976089.
52.
LyonsW. E.LoweryDavid. 1989. “Governmental Fragmental Versus Consolidation: Five Public-Ch.” Public Administration Review49 (6): 533. doi:10.2307/976575.
53.
MamunSha AlLownesNicholas E.2011. “Measuring Service Gaps: Accessibility-Based Transit Need Index.” Transportation Research Record2217 (1): 153–61.
54.
McDowellBruce D.2011. “Reflections on the Spirit and Work of the US Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.” Public Administration Review71 (2): 161–68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02325.x.
55.
McGinnisMichael Dean. 1999. Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
56.
McGinnisMichael Dean. 2011. “An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework.” Policy Studies Journal39 (1): 169–83.
57.
McGinnisMichael D.OstromElinor. 2012. “Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity.” Public Administration Review72 (1): 15–25.
58.
MillerDavid Y.LeeJoo Hun. 2011. “Making Sense of Metropolitan Regions: A Dimensional Approach to Regional Governance.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism41 (1): 126–45. doi:10.1093/publius/pjp040.
OakersonRonald J.ParksRoger B.1988. “Citizen Voice and Public Entrepreneurship: The Organizational Dynamic of a Complex Metropolitan County.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism18 (4): 91–112.
65.
OstromElinor. 1972. “Metropolitan Reform: Propositions Derived from Two Traditions.” Social Science Quarterly53:474–93.
66.
OstromElinor. 2009. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science325 (5939): 419–22.
67.
OstromVincentOstromElinor. 1971. “Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review31 (2): 203–16.
68.
OstromVincentTieboutCharles M.WarrenRobert. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” American Political Science Review55 (4): 831–42.
69.
Pahl-WostlClaudia. 2009. “A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes.” Global Environmental Change19 (3): 354–365.
70.
ParksRoger B.OakersonRonald J.1993. “Comparative Metropolitan Organization: Service Production and Governance Structures in St. Louis (MO) and Allegheny County (PA).” Publius: The Journal of Federalism23 (1): 19–39.
71.
PlotchPhilip MarkNellesJen. 2017. “Mitigating Gridlock: Lessons on Regional Governance from the Organization That Keeps New York Moving.” Articulo —Journal of Urban Research. Published electronically September 14. doi:10.4000/articulo.3290.
72.
PoisterTheodore H.PashaObed Q.EdwardsLauren Hamilton. 2013. “Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the US public transit industry.” Public Administration Review73 (4): 625–636.
73.
PolanyiKarl. 1951. The Logic of Liberty, Reflections and Rejoinders. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
74.
ProvanKeith G.KenisPatrick. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18 (2): 229–52.
75.
RivasplataCharlesIsekiHiroyukiSmithAdam. 2012. “Transit Coordination in the US: A Survey of Current Practice.” Journal of Public Transportation15 (1): 53–73.
76.
RyusPaul. 2010. “A Methodology for Performance Measurement and Peer Comparison in the Public Transportation Industry” (No. 141). Transportation Research Board.
77.
SanchezThomas W.WolfJames F.2005. “Environmental Justice and Transportation Equity: A Review of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.” Cambridge: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
78.
SchneiderMark. 1986. “Fragmentation and the Growth of Local Government.” Public Choice48 (3): 255–63.
79.
SchröderNadine Jenny Shirin. 2018. “The Lens of Polycentricity: Identifying Polycentric Governance Systems Illustrated through Examples from the Field of Water Governance.” Environmental Policy and Governance28 (4): 236–51.
80.
SciaraGian-Claudia. 2017. “Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Lessons from the Past, Institutions for the Future.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (3): 262–76. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1322526.
81.
SciaraGian-Claudia. 2020. “Implementing Regional Smart Growth without Regional Authority: The Limits of Information for Nudging Local Land Use.” Cities103:102661. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102661.
82.
SciaraGian-ClaudiaWachsMartin. 2007. “Metropolitan Transportation Funding: Prospects, Progress, and Practical Considerations.” Public Works Management & Policy12 (1): 378–94. doi:10.1177/1087724X07303987.
83.
ScottTyler A.GreerRobert A.2019. “Polycentricity and the Hollow State: Exploring Shared Personnel as a Source of Connectivity in Fragmented Urban Systems.” Policy Studies Journal47 (1): 52–76.
84.
SkelcherChris. 2005. “Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance.” Governance18 (1): 89–110.
85.
SkuzinskiThomas. 2017. The Risk of Regional Governance: Cultural Theory and Interlocal Cooperation. New York: Routledge.
86.
TaylorBrian D.SchweitzerLisa. 2005. “Assessing the Experience of Mandated Collaborative Inter-Jurisdictional Transport Planning in the United States.” Transport Policy12 (6): 500–11.
87.
ThompsonGregory L.BrownJeffrey R.2006. “Explaining variation in transit ridership in US metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000: multivariate analysis.” Transportation Research Record1986 (1): 172–181.
88.
United States Census of Governments. 2017. Local Governments by Type and State.
89.
WeiherGregory. 1991. The Fractured Metropolis: Political Fragmentation and Metropolitan Segregation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
90.
WeinreichDavid P.2016. “Thinking Big When Funding Is Local: Assessing the Potential of Local Option Transportation Funding in a Multi-Jurisdictional Context.” Public Works Management & Policy21 (2): 101–27. doi:10.1177/1087724X15598784.
91.
WeinreichDavid P.2017. “Making Self-Help Finance Work: Overcoming the Legislative Obstacles to Using Local Option Taxes for Regional Transportation.” Transportation Research Record2670 (1): 50–58. doi:10.3141/2670-07.
92.
WeinreichDavid P.SkuzinskiThomas S.2021. “Organizing Transit Institutions to Facilitate Cross-Jurisdictional Service Integration: A Multi-Region Comparative Case Study.” Journal of Urban Affairs43:1330–54.
93.
WeinstockDavid S.1982. “Using the Herfindahl Index to Measure Concentration.” Antitrust Bulletin27:285–301.
94.
WellsKirstin E.2007. “Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Coordinated Transportation Planning: The Case of Regional Transit Agencies in a Southern State.” https://trid.trb.org/view/800916.
95.
WolfJames F.FarquharMary Beth. 2005. “Assessing Progress: The State of Metropolitan Planning Organizations under ISTEA and TEA-21.” International Journal of Public Administration28 (13–14): 1057–79.
96.
WrightDeil S.1965. “The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations: Unique Features and Policy Orientation.” Public Administration Review25:193–202. doi:10.2307/973743.
97.
WybornCarina. 2015. “Co-Productive Governance: A Relational Framework for Adaptive Governance.” Global Environmental Change30:56–67.
98.
ZimmerBasil G.HawleyAmos H.1961. “Suburbanization and Some of Its Consequences.” Land Economics37 (1): 88–93. doi:10.2307/3159353.
99.
ZimmermanJoseph F.1970. “Metropolitan Reform in the US: An Overview.” Public Administration Review30 (5): 531–43. doi:10.2307/974421.
100.
ZimmermanJoseph F.1974. “The Metropolitan Area Problem.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science416 (1): 133–47. doi:10.1177/000271627441600113.
