By quantifying Twitter activity and sentiment for each of 274 neighborhood areas in New York City, this study introduces the Neighborhood Popularity Index and correlates changes in the index with real estate prices, a common measure of neighborhood change. Results show that social media provide both a near-real-time indicator of shifting attitudes toward neighborhoods and an early warning measure of future changes in neighborhood composition and demand. Although social media data provide an important complement to traditional data sources, the use of social media for neighborhood studies raises concerns regarding data accessibility and equity issues in data representativeness and bias.
AfzalanNaderEvans-CowleyJennifer. 2015. “Planning and Social Media: Facebook for Planning at the Neighbourhood Scale.” Planning Practice & Research30 (3): 270–85.
2.
AndersonNoel S.BusàAlessandroBrownEvrickCandipanJenniferConnPhyllisCordeauRobertaDiFazioWilliam, et al. 2012. The World in Brooklyn: Gentrification, Immigration, and Ethnic Politics in a Global City. Lanham: Lexington Books.
3.
BalduiniMarcoValleEmanuele DellaDell’AglioDanieleTsytsarauMikalaiPalpanasThemisConfalonieriCristian. 2013. “Social Listening of City Scale Events using the Streaming Linked Data Framework.” In International Semantic Web Conference, edited by AlaniH.KagalL.FokoueA.GrothP.BiemannC.ParreiraJ. X.AroyoL.NoyN.WeltyC.JanowiczK., 1–16. Berlin: Springer.
4.
BlankGrantLutzChristoph. 2017. “Representativeness of Social Media in Great Britain: Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and Instagram.” American Behavioral Scientist61 (7): 741–56.
5.
BollenJohanMaoHuinaPepeAlberto. 2011. “Modeling Public Mood and Emotion: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 5 (1), Barcelona, Spain, July 17–21.
6.
ChappleKarenZukMiriam. 2016. “Forewarned: The Use of Neighborhood Early Warning Systems for Gentrification and Displacement.” Cityscape18 (3): 109–30.
7.
CrawfordKate. 2009. “Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media.” Continuum23 (4): 525–35.
EfthymiouDimitriosAntoniouConstantinos. 2012. “Use of Social Media for Transport Data Collection.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences48:775–85.
11.
EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherine. 2010. “Welcome to the Neighborhood: How can Regional Science Contribute to the Study of Neighborhoods?” Journal of Regional Science50 (1): 363–79.
12.
FanWeiguoGordonMichael D.2014. “The Power of Social Media Analytics.” Communications of the ACM57 (6): 74–81.
13.
GlaeserEdward L.KimHyunjinLucaMichael. 2017. “Nowcasting the Local Economy: Using Yelp Data to Measure Economic Activity.” No. w24010. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24010.
14.
HargittaiEszter. 2020. “Potential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media.” Social Science Computer Review38 (1): 10–24.
15.
HawelkaBartoszSitkoIzabelaBeinatEuroSobolevskyStanislavKazakopoulosPavlosRattiCarlo. 2014. “Geo-Located Twitter as Proxy for Global Mobility Patterns.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science41 (3): 260–71.
16.
HeR.LeeW. S.NgH. T.DahlmeierD. 2019. An interactive multi-task learning network for end-to-end aspect-based sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06906.
17.
HollanderJustin B.GravesErinRenskiHenryFoster-KarimCaraWileyAndrewDasDibyendu. 2016. Urban Social Listening: Potential and Pitfalls for Using Microblogging Data in Studying Cities. London: Springer.
18.
HopkinsDaniel J.KingGary. 2010. “A method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 229–47.
KaplanAndreas M.HaenleinMichael. 2010. “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons53 (1): 59–68.
21.
KavanaughAndrea L.FoxEdward A.SheetzSteven D.YangSeungwonLiLin TzyShoemakerDonald J.NatsevApostolXieLexing. 2012. “Social Media Use by Government: From the Routine to the Critical.” Government Information Quarterly29 (4): 480–91.
22.
Kovacs-GyoriAnnaRisteaAlinaHavasClemensReschBerndCabrera-BaronaPablo. 2018. “# London2012: Towards Citizen-Contributed Urban Planning through Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data.” Urban Planning3 (1): 75–99.
23.
LuoFeixiongCaoGuofengMulliganKevinLiXiang. 2016. “Explore Spatiotemporal and Demographic Characteristics of Human Mobility via Twitter: A Case Study of Chicago.” Applied Geography70:11–25.
24.
MahmudJalalNicholsJeffreyDrewsClemens. 2014. “Home Location Identification of Twitter Users.” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST)5 (3): 1–21.
25.
MasonLorna. 2011. “Mapping a Changing Brooklyn, Mapping a Changing World: Gentrification, Immigration and Outmigration in Brooklyn 2000–2008.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia, February 24–27.
26.
MorstatterFredPfefferJürgenLiuHuan. 2014. “When Is It Biased? Assessing the Representativeness of Twitter’s Streaming API.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, edited by ChungChin-Wan, 555–56. New York: ACM.
27.
ObarJonathan A.Oeldorf-HirschAnne. 2020. “The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services.” Information, Communication & Society23 (1): 128–47.
28.
O’BrienDaniel TumminelliSampsonRobert J.WinshipChristopher. 2015. “Ecometrics in the Age of Big Data: Measuring and Assessing ‘broken windows’ using Large-Scale Administrative Records.” Sociological Methodology45 (1): 101–47.
29.
OhSangheeSynSue Yeon. 2015. “Motivations for Sharing Information and Social Support in Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66 (10): 2045–60.
30.
PoorthuisAte. 2018. “How to Draw a Neighborhood? The Potential of Big Data, Regionalization, and Community Detection for Understanding the Heterogeneous Nature of Urban Neighborhoods.” Geographical Analysis50 (2): 182–203.
31.
QualmanErik. 2012. Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
SawickiDavid S.FlynnPatrice. 1996. “Neighborhood Indicators: A Review of the Literature and an Assessment of Conceptual and Methodological Issues.” Journal of the American Planning Association62 (2): 165–83.
33.
SchweitzerLisa. 2014. “Planning and Social Media: A Case Study of Public Transit and Stigma on Twitter.” Journal of the American Planning Association80 (3): 218–38.
34.
SheltonTaylorPoorthuisAteZookMatthew. 2015. “Social Media and the City: Rethinking Urban Socio-Spatial Inequality Using User-Generated Geographic Information.” Landscape and Urban Planning142:198–211.
SteentoftAike A.PoorthuisAteLeeBu-SungSchläpferMarkus. 2018. “The Canary in the City: Indicator Groups as Predictors of Local Rent Increases.” EPJ Data Science7:1–15.
37.
StieglitzStefanDang-XuanLinh. 2013. “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems29 (4): 217–48.
ZukinSharonLindemanScarlettHursonLaurie. 2017. “The Omnivore’s Neighborhood? Online Restaurant Reviews, Race, and Gentrification.” Journal of Consumer Culture17 (3): 459–79.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
