We tested Jane Jacobs’ seminal finding—industry diversity and walkability contribute to urban innovation—at the walkable scale using the cases of Baltimore, United States, and Melbourne, Australia. We found that walkable urban form stimulates knowledge spillovers among workers of different industries, leading to innovation. One standard deviation increase in industry diversity in one-square-kilometer grids is associated with 1.3 to 3.4 more patent applications in Baltimore, and 0.4 to 0.9 more in Melbourne. If combined with a standard deviation increase in walkability, these benefits can be further magnified by 0.5 to 1.1 patent applications in Baltimore, and 0.2 in Melbourne.
AcsZoltan J.AnselinLucVargaAttila. 2002. “Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge.” Research Policy31 (7): 1069–85.
2.
AcsZoltan J.AudretschDavid B.1988. “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis.” The American Economic Review78 (4): 678–90.
3.
AllenThomas JohnFustfeldAlan R.1975. “Research Laboratory Architecture and the Structuring of Communications.” R&D Management5 (2): 153–64.
4.
AmitiMary. 1999. “Specialization Patterns in Europe.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv135 (4): 573–93.
5.
AnselinLucVargaAttilaAcsZoltan. 1997. “Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics42 (3): 422–48.
6.
ArzaghiMohammadHendersonJ. Vernon. 2008. “Networking off Madison Avenue.” The Review of Economic Studies75 (4): 1011–38.
7.
AttaranMohsenZwickMartin. 1987. “Entropy and Other Measures of Industrial Diversification.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics26 (4): 17–34.
8.
AudretschDavid B.FeldmanMaryann P.1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” The American Economic Review86 (3): 630–40.
9.
BalcerzakAdam P.PietrzakMichal Bernard. 2016. “Quality of Institutions for Knowledge-Based Economy within New Institutional Economics Framework. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for European Countries in the Years 2000-2013.” Economics & Sociology9 (4): 66–81.
10.
BatenJörgSpadavecchiaAnnaStrebJochenYinShuxi. 2007. “What Made Southwest German Firms Innovative around 1900? Assessing the Importance of Intra- and Inter-industry Externalities.” Oxford Economic Papers59 (Suppl. 1): i105–26.
11.
BeaudryCatherineBreschiStefano. 2003. “Are Firms in Clusters Really More Innovative?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology12 (4): 325–42.
12.
BeaudryCatherineSchiffauerovaAndrea. 2009. “Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate.” Research Policy38 (2): 318–37.
13.
BottazziLauraPeriGiovanni. 2003. “Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data.” European Economic Review47 (4): 687–710.
14.
BoutellierRomanUllmanFredrikSchreiberJürgNaefReto. 2008. “Impact of Office Layout on Communication in a Science-Driven Business.” R&D Management38 (4): 372–91.
15.
CarlinoGerald A.ChatterjeeSatyajitHuntRobert M.2007. “Urban Density and the Rate of Invention.” Journal of Urban Economics61 (3): 389–419.
16.
CataliniChristian. 2018. “Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity.” Management Science64 (9): 4348–64.
17.
CraneRandallManvilleMichael. 2008. “People or Place? Revisiting the Who versus the Where of Urban Development.” Land Lines20 (3): 2–7.
18.
CrosbyMark. 2000. “Patents, Innovation and Growth.” Economic Record76 (234): 255–62.
19.
DoveyKimPafkaElek. 2020. “What Is Walkability? The Urban DMA.” Urban Studies57 (1): 93–108.
20.
DurantonGillesOvermanHenry G.2005. “Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data.” Review of Economic Studies72 (4): 1077–1106.
21.
DurantonGillesPugaDiego. 2001. “Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products.” American Economic Review91 (5): 1454–77.
22.
EwingReidHandySusan. 2009. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Urban Design14 (1): 65–84.
23.
FangLi. 2015. “Do Clusters Encourage Innovation? A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Planning Literature30 (3): 239–60.
24.
FangLi. 2019. “Manufacturing Clusters and Firm Innovation.” Economic Development Quarterly33 (1): 6–18.
25.
FeldmanMaryann P.1994. “Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation.” Small Business Economics6 (5): 363–72.
26.
FeldmanMaryann P.AudretschDavid B.1999. “Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition.” European Economic Review43 (2): 409–29.
27.
ForsythAnn. 2015. “What Is a Walkable Place? The Walkability Debate in Urban Design.” Urban Design International20 (4): 274–92.
28.
FowlerEdmund P.1987. “Street Management and City Design.” Social Forces66 (2): 365–89.
29.
FrankLawrenceKerrJacquelineRosenbergDoriKingAbby. 2010. “Healthy Aging and Where You Live.” Journal of Physical Activity & Health7 (Suppl. 1): S82–S90.
FritschMichaelSlavtchevViktor. 2010. “How Does Industry Specialization Affect the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems?” Annals of Regional Science45 (1): 87–108.
32.
GertlerMeric S.2003. “Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There).” Journal of Economic Geography3 (1): 75–99.
33.
GertlerMeric S.VinodraiTara. 2005. “Learning from America? Knowledge Flows and Industrial Practices of German Firms in North America.” Economic Geography81 (1): 31–52.
34.
GilbertBrett AnitraMcDougallPatricia P.AudretschDavid B.2008. “Clusters, Knowledge Spillovers and New Venture Performance: An Empirical Examination.” Journal of Business Venturing23 (4): 405–22.
35.
HamidiShimaZandiatashbarAhoura. 2019. “Does Urban Form Matter for Innovation Productivity? A National Multi-level Study of the Association between Neighbourhood Innovation Capacity and Urban Sprawl.” Urban Studies56 (8): 1576–94.
36.
HendersonVernonKuncoroAriTurnerMatt. 1995. “Industrial Development in Cities.” Journal of Political Economy103 (5): 1067–90.
37.
HirscheyMarkRichardsonVernon J.2001. “Valuation Effects of Patent Quality: A Comparison for Japanese and US Firms.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal9 (1): 65–82.
38.
HumphreyColmanJensenShane T.SmallDylan S.ThurstonRachel. 2020. “Urban Vibrancy and Safety in Philadelphia.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science47 (9): 1573–87.
JacobsJane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
41.
JacobsJane. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.
42.
JacobsJane. 1984. Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.
43.
JaffeAdam B.TrajtenbergManuelHendersonRebecca. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics108 (3): 577–98.
44.
JallesJoão Tovar. 2010. “How to Measure Innovation? New Evidence of the Technology–Growth Linkage.” Research in Economics64 (2): 81–96.
KawabataMizukiShenQing. 2006. “Job Accessibility as an Indicator of Auto-oriented Urban Structure: A Comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33 (1): 115–30.
47.
KellyMorganHagemanAnya. 1999. “Marshallian Externalities in Innovation.” Journal of Economic Growth4 (1): 39–54.
48.
LeiXiao-PingZhaoZhi-YunZhangXuChenDar-ZenHuangMu-HsuanZhengJiaLiuRun-ShengZhangJingZhaoYun-Hua. 2013. “Technological Collaboration Patterns in Solar Cell Industry Based on Patent Inventors and Assignees Analysis.” Scientometrics96 (2): 427–41.
49.
LiuHaijing. 2018. “Collective Innovation Spaces in Shanghai: Spatial Patterns and Social Life.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
50.
LovasiGina S.NeckermanKathryn M.QuinnJames W.WeissChristopher C.RundleAndrew. 2009. “Effect of Individual or Neighborhood Disadvantage on the Association between Neighborhood Walkability and Body Mass Index.” American Journal of Public Health99 (2): 279–84.
51.
MaghelalPraveen K.CappCara Jean. 2011. “Walkability: A Review of Existing Pedestrian Indices.” Journal of Urban and Regional Information System Association23 (2): 5–19.
52.
MarshallAlfred. 1890. Principles of Political Economy. London: MacMillan.
53.
MoirHazel V. J.2009. “Who Benefits? An Empirical Analysis of Australian and US Patent Ownership.” In Sebastian Haunss and Kenneth C. Shadlen (eds), Politics of Intellectual Property, 195–224. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
54.
MontgomeryJohn. 1998. “Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design3 (1): 93–116.
55.
NeffkeFrankHenningMartinBoschmaRonLundquistKarl-JohanOlanderLars-Olof. 2011. “The Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities Along the Life Cycle of Industries.” Regional Studies45 (1): 49–65.
56.
NorthDouglas C.1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
OrlandoMichael J.2004. “Measuring R&D Spillovers: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity.” The RAND Journal of Economics35 (4): 777–86.
58.
OzbilAysePeponisJohnStoneBrian. 2011. “Understanding the Link between Street Connectivity, Land Use and Pedestrian Flows.” Urban Design International16 (2): 125–41.
59.
PaciRaffaeleUsaiStefano. 2000. “The Role of Specialisation and Diversity Externalities in the Agglomeration of Innovative Activities.” Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti2:237–68.
60.
PackalenMikkoBhattacharyaJay. 2015. “Cities and Ideas.” Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: NBER Working Paper.
61.
PafkaElekDoveyKim. 2017. “Permeability and Interface Catchment: Measuring and Mapping Walkable Access.” Journal of Urbanism10 (2): 150–62.
62.
PakesAriel. 1985. “On Patents, R & D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return.” Journal of Political Economy93 (2): 390–409.
63.
PavittKeith. 1987. “The Objectives of Technology Policy.” Science and Public Policy14 (4): 182–88.
64.
PivoGaryFisherJeffrey D.2011. “The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments.” Real Estate Economics39 (2): 185–219.
65.
PontM. Y. BerghauserHauptPer André. 2010. Spacematrix: Space, Density, and Urban Form. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
66.
RosenthalStuart S.StrangeWilliam C.2001. “The Determinants of Agglomeration.” Journal of Urban Economics50 (2): 191–229.
67.
RosenthalStuart S.StrangeWilliam C.2004. “Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies.” In J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-Francois Thisse (eds), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4, 2119–71. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
68.
SegerstromPaul S.1998. “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects.” American Economic Review88 (5): 1290–1310.
69.
SennettRichard. 2018. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
70.
ShenQing. 2001. “A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a US Metropolitan Area.” Journal of the American Planning Association67 (1): 53–68.
71.
SmithValdemarBrobergAnni LeneOvergaardJesper. 2002. “Does Location Matter for Firms’ R&D Behaviour? Empirical Evidence for Danish Firms.” Regional Studies36 (8): 825–32.
72.
SternMark J.SeifertSusan C.2010. “Cultural Clusters: The Implications of Cultural Assets Agglomeration for Neighborhood Revitalization.” Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (3): 262–79.
73.
StorperMichaelVenablesAnthony J.2004. “Buzz : Face-to-Face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography4 (4): 351–70.
74.
UsaiStefanoPaciRaffaele. 2003. “Externalities and Local Economic Growth in Manufacturing Industries.” In European Regional Growth, 293–321, edited by FingletonBernard. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
75.
WallstenScott J.2001. “An Empirical Test of Geographic Knowledge Spillovers Using Geographic Information Systems and Firm-Level Data.” Regional Science & Urban Economics31 (5): 571–99.
76.
WoodStephenDoveyKim. 2015. “Creative Multiplicities: Urban Morphologies of Creative Clustering.” Journal of Urban Design20 (1): 52–74.
77.
YigitcanlarTanGuaraldaMirkoTaboadaManuelaPancholiSurabhi. 2016. “Place Making for Knowledge Generation and Innovation.” Journal of Urban Technology23 (1): 115–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
