We investigate the role of smart growth in household location choice in the Chicago region, using a discrete choice analysis. In the midst of continued region-wide suburbanization, households tend to move to neighborhoods with rich consumption amenities and high transit access. However, this study does not find evidence that the neighborhood’s physical compactness is a significant location factor. Location preference for compact, mixed-use, and transit-oriented neighborhoods is significantly affected by the life cycle stage and income level, but less influenced by generation and age. Millennial households show strong preference for amenities and transit access only before they marry and have children.
AlonsoWilliam. 1964. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674730854.
2.
AndrewMarkMeenGeoffrey. 2006. “Population Structure and Location Choice: A Study of London and South East England.” Papers in Regional Science85 (3): 401–19. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00092.x.
3.
AxhausenKay W.KönigArndScottDarren M.JürgensClaudia. 2004. “Locations, Commitments and Activity Spaces.” In Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, edited by SchreckenbergMichaelSeltenReinhard, 205–30. Berlin: Springer.
4.
BartholomewKeithEwingReid. 2011. “Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development.” Journal of Planning Literature26 (1): 18–34. doi:10.1177/0885412210386540.
5.
BasoloVictoriaYerenaAnaid. 2017. “Residential Mobility of Low-Income Subsidized Households: A Synthesis of Explanatory Frameworks.” Housing Studies32 (6): 841–62. doi:10.1080/02673037.2016.1240762.
6.
BayohIsaacIrwinElena G.HaabTimothy. 2006. “Determinants of Residential Location Choice: How Important Are Local Public Goods in Attracting Homeowners to Central City Locations?” Journal of Regional Science46 (1): 97–120. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00434.x.
7.
Ben-AkivaMosheLermanSteven R.1985. “Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 6. doi:10.2307/1391567.
8.
BlumenbergEvelynRalphKelcieSmartMichaelTaylorBrian D.2016. “Who Knows about Kids These Days? Analyzing the Determinants of Youth and Adult Mobility in the U.S. between 1990 and 2009.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice93:39–54. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.010.
9.
BurchellRobert W.ShadNaveed A.ListokinDavidPhillipsHilaryDownsAnthonySeskinSamuelDavisJudy S.MooreTerryHeltonDavidGallMichelle. 1998. The Costs of Sprawl—Revisited. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
10.
CaoXinyu.2008. “Is Alternative Development Undersupplied? Examination of Residential Preferences and Choices of Northern California Movers.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2077:97–105. doi:10.3141/2077-13.
11.
ChenJasonChenCynthiaTimmermansHarry. 2008. “Accessibility Trade-Offs in Household Residential Location Decisions.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2077:71–79. doi:10.3141/2077-10.
ChoEun JooRodriguezDanielSongYan. 2008. “The Role of Employment Subcenters in Residential Location Decisions.” Journal of Transport and Land Use2:121–51. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v3i1.194.
14.
ColwellPeter F.DehringCarolyn A.TurnbullGeoffrey K.2002. “Recreation Demand and Residential Location.” Journal of Urban Economics51 (3): 418–28. doi:10.1006/juec.2001.2251.
15.
CoutureVictorHandburyJessie. 2017. “Urban Revival in America, 2000 to 2010.” No. w24084. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w24084.
DawkinsCasey J.2005. “Tiebout Choice and Residential Segregation by Race in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 1980–2000.” Regional Science and Urban Economics35 (6): 734–55. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.01.002.
de PalmaAndréPicardNathalieWaddellPaul. 2007. “Discrete Choice Models with Capacity Constraints: An Empirical Analysis of the Housing Market of the Greater Paris Region.” Journal of Urban Economics62 (2): 204–30. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.02.007.
20.
DebrezionGhebreegziabiherPelsEricRietveldPiet. 2007. “The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics35 (2): 161–80. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z.
EllisCliff. 2002. “The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals.” Journal of Urban Design7 (3): 261–91. doi:10.1080/1357480022000039330.
23.
EwingReidCerveroRobert. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 265–94. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766.
FriedmanJoseph. 1981. “A Conditional Logit Model of the Role of Local Public Services in Residential Choice.” Urban Studies18:347–58. http://usj.sagepub.com/content/18/3/347.short.
26.
FultonWilliam B.1996. The New Urbanism: Hope or Hype for American Communities?Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27.
GabrielStuart A.RosenthalStuart S.1989. “Household Location and Race: Estimates of a Multinomial Logit Model.” The Review of Economics and Statistics71 (2): 240–49. doi:10.2307/1926969.
GordonPeterRichardsonHarry W.1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?” Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 95–106. doi:10.1080/01944369708975727.
GordonPeterRichardsonHarry W.2001. “The Sprawl Debate: Let Markets Plan.” Publius31 (3): 131–49.
32.
GottliebPaul D.LentnekBarry. 2001. “Spatial Mismatch Is Not Always a Central-City Problem: An Analysis of Commuting Behaviour in Cleveland, Ohio, and Its Suburbs.” Urban Studies38 (7): 1161–86. doi:10.1080/00420980120051701.
33.
GreenleeAndrew J.2019. “Assessing the Intersection of Neighborhood Change and Residential Mobility Pathways for the Chicago Metropolitan Area (2006–2015).” Housing Policy Debate29 (1): 186–212. doi:10.1080/10511482.2018.1476898.
34.
GuoJessica Y.BhatChandra R.2001. Residential Location Choice Modeling: Accommodating Sociodemographic, School Quality and Accessibility Effects. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
35.
GuoJessica Y.BhatChandra R.2007. “Operationalizing the Concept of Neighborhood: Application to Residential Location Choice Analysis.” Journal of Transport Geography15 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001.
36.
HandySusanSallisJames F.WeberDeanneMaibachEdHollanderMarla. 2008. “Is Support for Traditionally Designed Communities Growing? Evidence from Two National Surveys.” Journal of the American Planning Association74 (2): 209–21. doi:10.1080/01944360802010418.
37.
HörnstenLisaFredmanPeter. 2000. “On the Distance to Recreational Forests in Sweden.” Landscape and Urban Planning51 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00097-9.
38.
Howell-MoroneyMichael. 2008. “The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century.” Public Administration Review68 (1): 97–109. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00840.x.
39.
HuLingqianWangLiming. 2019. “Housing Location Choices of the Poor: Does Access to Jobs Matter?” Housing Studies34 (10): 1721–45.
40.
IannacchioneVincentMortonKatherineMcMichaelJosephCunninghamDavidCajkaJamesChromyJames. 2007. “Comparing the Coverage of a Household Sampling Frame Based on Mailing Addresses to a Frame Based on Field Enumeration.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2007/Files/JSM2007-000675.pdf.
KaplanRachelAustinMaureen E.2004. “Out in the Country: Sprawl and the Quest for Nature Nearby.” Landscape and Urban Planning69 (2): 235–43. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.006.
43.
KennelTimothy L.LiMei. 2009. “Content and Coverage Quality of a Commercial Address List as a National Sampling Frame for Household Surveys.” In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings2009, 2364–78. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2009/Files/304010.pdf.
44.
KimJae HongPagliaraFrancescaPrestonJohn. 2005. “The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behaviour.” Urban Studies42 (9): 1621–36. doi:10.1080/00420980500185611.
45.
KimJunghwanLeeBumsoo. 2019. “More than Travel Time: New Accessibility Index Capturing the Connectivity of Transit Services.” Journal of Transport Geography78:8–18. doi:10.1016/201905008.
46.
KimTae-KyungHornerMark W.2003. “Exploring Spatial Effects on Urban Housing Duration.” Environment and Planning A35 (8): 1415–29. doi:10.1068/a35170.
47.
KimTae-KyungHornerMark W.MaransRobert W.2005. “Life Cycle and Environmental Factors in Selecting Residential and Job Locations.” Housing Studies20 (3): 457–73. doi:10.1080/02673030500062335.
48.
KleitRachel GarshickGalvezMartha. 2011. “The Location Choices of Public Housing Residents Displaced by Redevelopment: Market Constraints, Personal Preferences, or Social Information?” Journal of Urban Affairs334:375–407. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00557.x.
49.
KnaapGerritTalenEmily. 2005. “New Urbanism and Smart Growth: A Few Words from the Academy.” International Regional Science Review28 (2): 107–18. doi:10.1177/0160017604273621.
50.
LeeBrianPaulH. Y.Liming WangWaddellPendyalaRam M.2010. “Reexamining the Influence of Work and Nonwork Accessibility on Residential Location Choices with a Microanalytic Framework.” Environment and Planning A42 (4): 913–30. doi:10.1068/a4291.
51.
LeeHyojung. 2020. “Are Millennials Coming to Town? Residential Location Choice of Young Adults.” Urban Affairs Review56:565–604. doi:10.1177/1078087418787668.
52.
LeeYongsungLeeBumsooShubhoMd Tanvir Hossain. 2019. “Urban Revival by Millennials? Intraurban Net Migration Patterns of Young Adults, 1980–2010.” Journal of Regional Science59 (3): 538–66. doi:10.1111/jors.12445.
53.
LevineJonathan. 2005. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land-Use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
LevineJonathanInamAseemTorngGwo-Wei. 2005. “A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24 (3): 317–30. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267714.
56.
LindstromBonnie. 1997. “A Sense of Place: Housing Selection on Chicago’s North Shore.” The Sociological Quarterly38 (1): 19–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4121264.
57.
LoomisJohn B.2014. “2013 WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics39 (1): 34–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44131313.
58.
ManvilleMichaelKingDavid A.SmartMichael J.2017. “The Driving Downturn: A Preliminary Assessment.” Journal of the American Planning Association83 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1247653.
59.
MaroisGuillaumeLordSébastienNegron-PobletePaula. 2018. “The Residential Mobility of Seniors among Different Residential Forms: Analysis of Metropolitan and Rural Issues for Six Contrasted Regions in Québec, Canada.” Journal of Housing for the Elderly32 (1): 73–98. doi:10.1080/02763893.2017.1393488.
60.
McDonaldNoreen C.2015. “Are Millennials Really the ‘Go-Nowhere’ Generation?” Journal of the American Planning Association81 (2): 90–103. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196.
MillsEdwin S.1967. “An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area.” The American Economic Review57 (2): 197–210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1821621.
63.
MillsapAdam. 2018. “Location Choice in Early Adulthood: Millennials versus Baby Boomers.” Papers in Regional Science97 (S1): S139–67. doi:10.1111/pirs.12240.
O’MuircheartaighColmEckmanStephanieWeissCharlene. 2002. “Traditional and Enhanced Field Listing for Probability Sampling.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2002/Files/JSM2002-001047.pdf.
70.
O’MuircheartaighColmEnglishNedEckmanStephanieUpchurchHeidiGarciaErikaLepkowskiJames. 2006. “Validating a Sampling Revolution: Benchmarking Address Lists against Traditional Listing.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association. http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2006/Files/JSM2006-000909.pdf.
71.
PinjariAbdul RawoofPendyalaRam M.BhatChandra R.WaddellPaul A.2011. “Modeling the Choice Continuum: An Integrated Model of Residential Location, Auto Ownership, Bicycle Ownership, and Commute Tour Mode Choice Decisions.” Transportation38 (6): 933–58. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9360-y.
72.
ReschovskyAndrew. 1979. “Residential Choice and the Local Public Sector: An Alternative Test of the ‘Tiebout Hypothesis.’” Journal of Urban Economics6 (4): 501–20. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(79)90027-5.
73.
SchirmerPatrick M.Van EggermondMichael A. B.AxhausenKay W.2014. “The Role of Location in Residential Location Choice Models: A Review of Literature.” Journal of Transport and Land Use7 (2): 3–21. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v7i2.740.
74.
ShenQing. 1998. “Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhood and Employment Accessibility of Low Wage Workers.” Environment and Planning B25 (1): 345–65. doi:10.1068/b250345.
75.
SohmerRebecca R.LangRobert E.2000. “From Seaside to Southside: New Urbanism’s Quest to Save the Inner City.” Housing Policy Debate11 (4): 751–60. doi:10.1080/10511482.2000.9521386.
76.
SongYanKnaapGerrit-Jan. 2003. “New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assessment.” Journal of Urban Economics54 (2): 218–38. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00059-7.
77.
SongYanKnaapGerrit-Jan. 2004. “Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl?” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (2): 210–25. doi:10.1080/01944360408976371.
78.
TalenEmily. 2000. “New Urbanism and the Culture of Criticism.” Urban Geography21 (4): 318–41. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.21.4.318.
79.
TieboutCharles M.1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416–24. doi:10.1086/257839.
80.
TremouletAndréeDannRyan J.AdkinsArlie. 2016. “Moving to Location Affordability? Housing Choice Vouchers and Residential Relocation in the Portland, Oregon, Region.” Housing Policy Debate26 (4–5): 692–713. doi:10.1080/10511482.2016.1150314.
81.
TrudeauDan. 2013. “A Typology of New Urbanism Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability6 (2): 113–38. doi:10.1080/17549175.2013.771695.
82.
TrudeauDanMalloyPatrick. 2011. “Suburbs in Disguise? Examining the Geographies of the New Urbanism.” Urban Geography32 (3): 424–47. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.3.424.
WalkerKyle E.2016b. “Baby Boomer Migration and Demographic Change in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.” Migration Studies4 (3): 347–72. doi:10.1093/migration/mnw012.
86.
WeisbrodGlenLermanSteven R.Ben-AkivaMoshe. 1980. “Tradeoffs in Residential Location Decisions: Transportation versus Other Factors.” Transportation Policy and Decision-Making1 (1): 13–26.
87.
ZhongLaitianLeeBumsoo. 2017. “Carless or Car Later?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2664:69–78. doi:10.3141/2664-08.
88.
ZhouBinKockelmanKara M.2008. “Microsimulation of Residential Land Development and Household Location Choices: Bidding for Land in Austin, Texas.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2077 (1): 106–12. doi:10.3141/2077-14.
89.
ZondagBarryPietersMarits. 2005. “Influence of Accessibility on Residential Location Choice.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1902:63–70. doi:10.3141/1902-08.
