Today’s immigrant rights movements bring attention to jails—some cities’ largest public safety expenditures—as primary sites for deportation operations. This article examines how these movements push for sanctuary while challenging jails’ political and economic place in cities. With qualitative and archival data from a case study in Santa Ana, California, this research finds that by ending U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) contracts, exposing the economic and political interests invested in jails, and pushing for jail reuse alternatives, sanctuary planning threatens public investment in police and security infrastructure. Challenges to these movements include jurisdictional fragmentation with diverse approaches to detention.
AbregoLeisy J.2013. “Latino Immigrants’ Diverse Experiences of ‘Illegality.’” In Constructing Immigrant “Illegality”: Critiques Experiences Responses, edited by MenjívarCeciliaKanstroomDaniel, 139–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107300408.008.
2.
American Bar Association Commission on Immigration. 2007. “Report on Observational Tour of Santa Ana Detention Facility.” American Bar Association Commission on Immigration, Santa Ana.
3.
American Bar Association Delegation. 2004. “Report on Observational Tour of the Santa Ana Detention Facility.” American Bar Association Delegation, Santa Ana.
City of Santa Ana Request for Council Action. 2017. “Agreement with Vanir Construction Management Inc. for Jail Reuse Study.” City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana.
13.
City of Santa Ana Staff Report. 2016. “Council Update Santa Ana Jail Options.” City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana.
14.
ColemanMathew. 2007. “Immigration Geopolitics Beyond the Mexico-US Border.” Antipode39:54–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00506.x.
15.
ColemanMathewKocherAustin. 2011. “Detention, Deportation, Devolution and Immigrant Incapacitation in the US, Post 9/11.” Geographical Journal177 (3): 228–37. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00424.x.
16.
Cordero-GuzmánHectorMartinNinaQuiroz-BecerraVictoriaTheodoreNik. 2008. “Voting with Their Feet: Nonprofit Organizations and Immigrant Mobilization.” American Behavioral Scientist52 (4): 598–617. doi:10.1177/0002764208324609.
17.
CrenshawKimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43 (6): 1241–99. doi:10.2307/1229039.
18.
CunninghamHillary. 2013. “The Emergence of the Ontario Sanctuary Coalition: From Humanitarian and Compassionate Review to Civil Initiative.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements, edited by LippertRandy K.RehaagSean, 162–74. New York: Routledge.
19.
DavisMike. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York: Verso.
20.
DavisMike. 2000. Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the U.S. City. New York: Verso.
21.
De GenovaNicholas P.2002. “Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology31 (1): 419–47. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
FainsteinSusan. 2009. “Planning and the Just City.” In Searching for the Just City, edited by MarcusePeterConnollyJamesNovyJohannesOlivoIngridPotterCuzSteilJustin, 19-39. London: Routledge.
25.
FialhoChristina. 2018. “Rebuilding Trust: A Case Study for Closing & Repurposing Immigration Detention Facilities.” Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement. https://www.freedomforimmigrants.org/santa-ana-city-jail.
26.
FreelandGregory. 2010. “Negotiating Place, Space and Borders: The New Sanctuary Movement.” Latino Studies8 (4): 485–508. doi:10.1057/lst.2010.53.
27.
GillNicholas. 2009. “Governmental Mobility: The Power Effects of the Movement of Detained Asylum Seekers around Britain’s Detention Estate.” Political Geography28 (3): 186–96. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.003.
28.
GillNickConlonDeirdreMoranDominiqueBurridgeAndrew. 2018. “Carceral Circuitry: New Directions in Carceral Geography.” Progress in Human Geography42 (2): 183–204. doi:10.1177/0309132516671823.
29.
GilmoreRuth Wilson. 1999. “Globalisation and US Prison Growth: From Military Keynesianism to Post-Keynesian Militarism.” Race & Class40 (2–3): 171–88. doi:10.1177/030639689904000212.
30.
GilmoreRuth Wilson. 2007. Golden Gulag : Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Gómez CervantesAndreaMenjívarCeciliaStaplesWilliam G.2017. “‘Humane’ Immigration Enforcement and Latina Immigrants in the Detention Complex.” Feminist Criminology12 (3): 269–92. doi:10.1177/1557085117699069.
32.
Gonzalez O’BrienLorenBenjaminCollingwoodEl-KhatibStephen Omar. 2017. “The Politics of Refuge: Sanctuary Cities, Crime, and Undocumented Immigration.” Urban Affairs Review55 (1): 3–40. doi:10.1177/1078087417704974.
HolstonJames. 2009. “Insurgent Citizenship in an Era of Global Urban Peripheries.” City and Society21 (2): 245–47. doi:10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01024.x.
MancinaPeter. 2013. “The Birth of a Sanctuary-City: A History of Governmental Sanctuary in San Francisco.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements, edited by LippertRandy K.RehaagSean, 205–18. New York: Routledge.
MarcusePeter. 2013. “Abandonment, Gentrification, and Displacement: The Linkages in New York City.” In Gentrifi-cation of the City, edited by SmithNeilWilliamsPeter, 153–77. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315889092.
45.
MartinLauren L.MitchelsonMatthew L.2009. “Geographies of Detention and Imprisonment: Interrogating Spatial Practices of Confinement, Discipline, Law, and State Power.” Geography Compass3 (1): 459–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00196.x.
46.
McDonaldJean. 2012. “Building a Sanctuary City: Municipal Migrant Rights in the City of Toronto.” In Citizenship, Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement, edited by NyersPeterRygielKim, 129–45. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203125113.
47.
MenjívarCeciliaBejaranoCynthia L.2004. “Latino Immigrants’ Perceptions of Crime and Police Authorities in the United States: A Case Study from the Phoenix Metropolitan Area.” Ethnic and Racial Studies27 (1): 120–48. doi:10.1080/0141987032000147968.
48.
MenjívarCeciliaSalcidoOlivia. 2002. “Immigrant Women and Domestic Violence—Common Experiences in Different Countries.” Gender & Society16 (6): 898–920. doi:10.1177/089124302237894.
MiraftabFaranak. 2016. “Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South.” In Readings in Planning Theory, edited by FainsteinSusan S.DeFillippisJames, 4th ed., 480–98. Chichester: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch24.
51.
MoranDominique. 2015. Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Farnham: Ashgate.
52.
MoranDominique. 2013. “Carceral Geography and the Spatialities of Prison Visiting: Visitation, Recidivism, and Hyperincarceration.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31 (1): 174–90. doi:10.1068/d18811.
53.
MoranDominiqueTurnerJenniferSchlieheAnna K.2018. “Conceptualizing the Carceral in Carceral Geography.” Progress in Human Geography42 (5): 666–86. doi:10.1177/0309132517710352.
ParradoEmilio A.2012. “Immigration Enforcement Policies, the Economic Recession, and the Size of Local Mexican Immigrant Populations.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science641 (1): 16–37. doi:10.1177/0002716211435353.
61.
PeckJamieTheodoreNik. 2008. “Carceral Chicago: Making the Ex-Offender Employability Crisis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32 (2): 251–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00785.x.
62.
PerlaHectorJrCoutinSusan Bibler. 2013. “Legacies and Origins of the 1980s US–Central American Sanctuary Movement.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship and Social Movements, edited by LippertRandy K.RehaagSean, 73–91. New York: Routledge.
RidgleyJennifer. 2008. “Cities of Refuge: Immigration Enforcement, Police, and the Insurgent Genealogies of Citizenship in U.S. Sanctuary Cities.” Urban Geography29 (1): 53–77. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.29.1.53.
SojaEdward W.1995. “Heterotopologies: A Remembrance of Other Spaces in the Citadel-LA.” In Postmodern Cities and Spaces, edited by WatsonSophieGibsonKatherine, 13–34. Cambridge: Blackwell.
StuesseAngelaColemanMathew. 2014. “Automobility, Immobility, Altermobility: Surviving and Resisting the Intensification of Immigrant Policing.” City and Society26 (1): 51–72. doi:10.1111/ciso.12034.
VarsanyiMonica W.2008a. “Immigration Policing Through the Backdoor: City Ordinances, the ‘Right to the City,’ and the Exclusion of Undocumented Day Laborers.” Urban Geography29 (1): 29–52. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.29.1.29.
79.
VarsanyiMonica W.2008b. “Rescaling the ‘Alien,’ Rescaling Personhood: Neoliberalism, Immigration, and the State.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers98 (4): 877–96. doi:10.1080/00045600802223341.
80.
WacquantLoïc. 2001. “Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh.” Punishment & Society3 (1): 95–133. doi:10.1177%2F14624740122228276.
81.
WacquantLoïc. 2009a. Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
82.
WacquantLoïc. 2009b. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
WalkerKyle E.LeitnerHelga. 2011. “The Variegated Landscape of Local Immigration Policies in the United States.” Urban Geography32 (2): 156–78. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.2.156.
