Abstract
Collaboration is used to address a range of complex problems, but there is less research on ongoing collaboration networks. We use interviews, document analysis, focus groups, and a survey to evaluate transportation networks in Oregon. Participants were positive about network operations, but the research highlighted how a centralized network limited goal sharing and multilevel functioning. Information procedures built group expertise and defined the network’s practical authority, despite a broader mandate. Representing diffuse interests was a challenge that requires further research. These findings highlight options for designing and improving collaboration networks relevant to a range of planning and management settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
