The basic objective of this paper is to research the capacity of local-level governance in Serbia to transform spatial planning practices. The analysis was performed on the case study of the City of Niš, where besides the presence of formal planning instruments, new informal governance practices have emerged. The governance of spatial development was analyzed in relation to three ideal governance models: hierarchy, market, and network, and four planning models: the comprehensive planning model, the negotiative planning model, the neoliberal model, and the collaborative model. The strengths and weaknesses of the institutional and planning framework are defined, and recommendations for improvement are given.
AlbrechtsLouis. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31:743–58.
2.
BörzelTanja A.RisseThomas. 2010. “Governance without a State: Can It Work?”Regulation & Governance4 (2): 113–34. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x.
3.
City of Niš Development Strategy (“Official Gazette of the City of Niš,” br. 82/07)/Strategija razvoja grada Niša (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 82/07.)
4.
DangThi Kim PhungVisseren-HamakersIngrid J.ArtsBas. 2016. “A Framework for Assessing Governance Capacity: An Illustration from Vietnam’s Forestry Reforms.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy34 (6): 1154–74.
5.
Detailed Regulation Plan for the complex of Niš Electronics industry (“Official Gazette of City of Niš,” br. 26/14)/Plan detaljne regulacije kompleksa Elektronske industrije Niš (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 26/14).
6.
Detailed Regulation Plan “Voždova” in Niš (“Official Gazette of City of Niš,” br. 35/04)/Plan detaljne regulacije “Voždova” u Nišu (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 35/04).
7.
DührStefanie. 2007. The Visual Language of Spatial Planning: Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe. RTPI Library Series. New York: Routledge.
8.
FengerMennoBekkersVictor.2007. “The Governance Concept in Public Administration.” In Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices, edited by BekkersVictorDijkstraGeskeEdwardsArthurFengerMenno, 13–35. Bulrington: Ashgate.
9.
FerlieEwanMusselinChristineAndresani.Gianluca2009. “The Governance of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective.” In University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, edited by ParadeiseCatherineRealeEmanuelaBleikliIvarFerlieEwan, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.
10.
General regulation plan for the area of the city municipality Medijana (“Official Gazette of City of Niš,” br. 72/12)/Plan generalne regulacije područja gradske opštine Medijana (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 72/12)
11.
General Urban Plan of Niš 2010-2025 (“Official Gazette of City of Niš,” no 43/11)/Generalni urbanistički plan Niša 2010-2025. (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 43/11). (In Serbian)
12.
HealeyPatsy.1997a. “An Institutionalist Approach to Spatial Planning.” In Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, edited by HealeyPatsyKhakeeAbdulMotteAlainNeedhamBarrie, 21–39. London: Routledge.
HealeyPatsy.2003. “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation.” In Readings in Planning Theory, edited by CampbellScottFainsteinSusan S.Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
HealeyPatsy. 2006. “The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning.” In Institutions and Planning, edited by VermaNiraj, 61–91. Oxford: Elsevier.
16.
HirtSonia. 2015. “Planning during Post-socialism.” In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by James D. Wright, Vol. 18, 187–92. London: Elsevier.
Housing Strategy of the city of Niš (“Official Gazette of the City of Niš,” br. 95/2006)/Stambena strategija grada Niša (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 95/2006).
19.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
KovziridzeTamara.2008. Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-level Structures: Foreign and European Relations to Belgian, German and Austrian Federated Entities. Brussels: VUBPRESS.
23.
LaneJan-Erik. 2000. New Public Management. London: Routledge.
24.
Law on converting rights of use into property rights for construction land with recompense (“Official Gazette of RS,” no. 64/15)/Zakon o pretvaranju prava korišćenja u pravo svojine na građevinskom zemljištu uz naknadu (“Službeni glasnik RS,” br. 64/15).
25.
Law on Planning and Construction (“Official Gazette of RS,” no.72/2009, 81/2009, 64/2010, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013, 50/, 98/2013 -, 132/2014 and 145/2014)/Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji (“Sl. glasnik RS,” br. 72/2009, 81/2009—ispr., 64/2010—odluka US, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013—odluka US, 50/2013—odluka US, 98/2013—odluka US, 132/2014 i 145/2014).
26.
Law on property restitution and compensation (“Official Gazette of RS,” 72/2011, 108/2013, 142/2014 and 88/2015)/Zakon o vraćanju oduzete imovine i obeštećenju (“Službeni glasnik RS,” br. 72/2011, 108/2013, 142/2014 i 88/2015—odluka US)].
27.
LazarevićBajec Nada. 2006. “The thesis on the future direction of spatial development in Serbia.” In Planning, Investing, and Implementation Reallocation toward European Legislation, edited by Veroljub S. Trifunović, Miodrag Ralević, 19–25. Belgrade: Serbian Town Planners Association. (in Serbian).
28.
LazarevićBajec Nada. 2009. “Rational or Collaborative Model of Urban Planning in Serbia: Institutional Limitations.” Serbian Architectural Journal1:81–106.
29.
LazarevićBajec Nada. 2011. Prostorni plan Republike Srbije 2010. godine [Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia 2010]. Fokus: kvartalni izveštaj o institucionalnim reformama. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.
30.
Maksin-MićićMarijaMilijićSašaNenković-RiznićMarina. 2009. “Spatial and Environmental Planning of Sustainable Regional Development in Serbia.” SPATIUM International Review21:39–52.
31.
MarkovićGoran. 2011. “Workers’ Councils in Yugoslavia: Successes and Failures.” Socialism and Democracy25 (3): 393–425.
32.
MashiriMacNjengaPeterNjengaCeciliaChakwiziraJamesFriedrichMaartin. 2017. “Towards a Framework for Measuring Spatial Planning Outcomes in South Africa.” Sociology & Anthropology5:146–68. doi:10.13189/sa.2017.050205.
33.
MeulemanLouis.2008. Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
34.
MilutinovićSlobodanMaksićMilicaĐorđevićVesnaPešićMiomir. 2006. “Neka iskustva iz formulisanja stambenog profila grada Niša [Some Experiences from Formulating the Housing Profile of the City of Niš].” In Polazišta za formiranje nove stambene politike Republike Srbije, zbornik radova sa nacionalne stambene konferencije: Ka novoj stambenoj politici Republike Srbije, 125–31. Beograd: Ministarstvo za kapitalne investicije.
35.
Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning and the Republic Agency for Spatial Planning. 2009. “Strategija prostornog razvoja Republike Srbije 2009-2013-2020 [Strategy of Spatial Development of Republic of Serbia 2009-2013-2020].”Beograd.
36.
Nedović-BudićZoricaCavrićBranko. 2006. “Waves of Planning: Framework for Studying the Evolution of Planning Systems and Empirical Insights from Serbia and Montenegro.” Planning Perspectives21 (4): 393–425.
37.
Nedović-BudićZoricaDjordjevićDejanDabovićTijana. 2011. “The Mornings after. . . Serbian Spatial Planning Legislation in Context.” European Planning Studies19 (3): 429–55. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548448.
38.
Nedović-BudićZoricaZekovićSlavkaVujoševićMiodrag. 2012. “Land Privatization and Management in Serbia; Policy in Limbo.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research29 (4): 306–17.
39.
ParkerGavinDoakJoe. 2012. Key Concepts in Planning. London: SAGE.
40.
PowellWalter W.1990. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior12:295–336.
41.
Rules on the content, method and procedure for preparing spatial and urban planning documents (“Official Gazette of RS,” br. 64/15)/Pravilnik o sadržini, načinu i postupku izrade dokumenata prostornog i urbanističkog planiranja (“Službeni glasnik RS,” no. 64/2015).
42.
ŠećerovVelimirFilipovićDejan. 2010. “Experiences and Problems in Implementing the Spatial Plans of Municipalities.” Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva90 (1): 197–214. doi:10.2298/GSGD1001197S.
43.
SeppoTiihonen. 2004. From Governing to Governance: A Process of Change. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
44.
Spatial plan for the administrative area of the City of Niš 2021 (“Official Gazette of RS,” br. 65/15)/Prostorni plan administrativnog područja grada Niša 2021. (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 64/15).
45.
StanilovKiril. 2007. “Urban Development Policies in Central and Eastern Europe during the Transition Period and Their Impact on Urban Form.” In The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism, edited by StanilovKiril, 347–60. Dordrecht: Springer.
46.
StankovićMiroljubPopovićNenadMiloševićDejan. 2010. “Strategija razvoja grada Niša: Ostvarivanje, osavremenjavanje i podešavanje [Development Strategy of the City of Niš: Realization, Modernization and Adjustment].” In Strateško planiranje lokalnog razvoja—Studije slučaja malih i srednjih evropskih gradova, edited by RamirezLihijaKebedeGulelatMarunaMarija, 41–51. Belgrade: UN-HABITAT SIRP.
47.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. 2014. “Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Serbia.” Population. Comparative Overview of the Number of Population in 1948, 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2002 and 2011. http://www.stat.gov.rs/en-us/oblasti/popis/.
Taşan-KokTuna. 2006. “Institutional and Spatial Change.” In The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, edited by TsenkovaSashaNedović-BudićZorica, 51–71. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
50.
The Constitution of the Republic of Serbia (“Official Gazette of RS,” no. 98/2006)/Ustav Republike Srbije (“Službeni glasnik RS,” br. 98/2006).
51.
The Revision of the City of Niš Development Strategy for the period 2009-2020 with the Operational Programme 2009-2011 (“Official Gazette of the City of Niš,” br. 20/10]/Revizija Strategije razvoja grada Niša za period 2009-2020. godine sa operativnim programom 2009-2011. godine (“Službeni list grada Niša,” br. 20/10)
52.
ThompsonGrahame F.2003. Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
TsenkovaSasha. 2006. “Beyond Transitions: Understanding Urban Change in Post-socialist Cities.” In The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, edited by Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić, 21–51. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
54.
van DijkJanWinters-van BeekAnneleen. 2008. “The Perspective of Network Government: The Struggle between Hierarchies, Markets and Networks as Modes of Governance in Contemporary Government.” In ICTs, Citizens and Governance: after the Hype!, edited by MeijerAlbertBoersmaKeesWagenaarPieter, 235–55. Series Innovation and the Public Sector. Amsterdam: IOS Press. http://www.gw.utwente.nl/mco/bestanden/theperspectiveofnetworkgovernment.pdf.
55.
VujoševićMiodrag. 2010. “Collapse of Strategic Thinking, Research and Governance in Serbia and Possible Role of the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) in Its Renewal.” SPATIUM International Review23:22–29. doi:10.2298/SPAT1023022V.
56.
VujoševićMiodragNedović-BudićZorica. 2006 “Planning and Societal Context—The Case of Belgrade.” In The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy, edited by Serbia, 275–94. New York: Physica-Verlag, A Springer.
57.
VujoševićMiodragZekovićSlavkaMaričićTamara. 2012. “Post-socialist Transition in Serbia and Its Unsustainable Path.” European Planning Studies20 (10): 1707–27.
58.
ZecMiodragRadonjićOgnjen. 2012. “Ekonomski model socijalističke Jugoslavije: saga o autodestrukciji [Economic Model of Socialist Yugoslavia: A Saga on Autodestruction].” Sociologija54 (4): 695–720.
59.
ZekovićSlavkaMaričićTamaraCvetinovićMarija. 2016. “Transformation of Housing Policy in a Post-socialist City: The Example of Belgrade.” In Regulating the City: Contemporary Urban Housing Law, edited by SidoliJulianVolsMichelKiehlMarvin, 47–74. Den Haag: Eleven Publishing.
60.
ZekovićSlavkaVujoševićMiodragMaričićTamara. 2015. “Spatial Regularization, Planning Instruments and Urban Land Market in a Post-socialist Society: The Case of Belgrade.” Habitat International48:65–78. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010.
