Informality originated in the field of urban planning studies related to the global South. As this particular debate is aimed at making a contribution to planning theory in general, the concept has gradually traveled beyond the global South. This article explores how informality can be used to analyze community-led planning practices in Western countries, by reflecting on its usability in a country that has a strongly formalized planning context, namely, the Netherlands. By expanding what is currently described as spatial planning, informality makes planning theories and practices more inclusive in cases where unregulated planning activities are performed by nongovernmental actors.
NezarAlSayyadRoyAnanya, eds. 2004. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham: Lexington Books.
5.
AltrockUwe. 2012. “Conceptualising Informality: Some Thoughts on the Way towards Generalisation.” In Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal, edited by McFarlaneColinWaibelMichael, 171–93. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
6.
ArnsteinSherry R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4):216–24. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
7.
BoonstraBeitskeBoelensLuuk. 2011. “Self-Organization in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning.” Urban Research & Practice4 (2): 99–122.
8.
BriassoulisHelen. 1997. “How the Others Plan: Exploring the Shape and Forms of Informal Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (2): 105–17. doi:10.1177/0739456x9701700202.
9.
BuitelaarEdwin. 2008. “Houston: Planning in the City That Does Not Plan?” In The Cost of Land Use Decisions, edited by Edwin Buitelaar, 107–129. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
CastellsManuelPortesAlejandro. 1989. “World Underneath: The Origins, Dynamics, and Effects of the Informal Economy.” In The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, edited by PortesAlejandroCastellsManuelBentonLauren, 11–39. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Centraal Bureau voor statistiek. 2015. Kerncijfers wijken en buurten 2015 [Population statistics districts and neighbourhoods 2015]. The Hague: Centraal Bureau voor statistiek.
12.
DavisMike. 2006. “Planet of Slums.” New Perspectives Quarterly23 (2): 6–11.
13.
DavoudiSiminPendleburyJohn. 2010. “The Evolution of Planning as an Academic Discipline.” Town Planning Review81 (6): 613–46.
De Twentsche Courant Tubantia. 2007. “Fel protest tegen velden [Fierce protest against sports fields].” February23, 2007, 8.
16.
De Twentsche Courant Tubantia. 2010. “Het doek is gevallen, de bouw kan beginnen [The game is over, construction work can begin].” April23, 2010. http://academic.lexisnexis.nl/.
17.
FairbanksRobert P.2011. “The Politics of Urban Informality in Philadelphia’s Recovery House Movement.” Urban Studies48 (12): 2555–70. doi:10.1177/0042098011411943.
18.
ForesterJohn. 2008 “Are Collaboration and Participation More Trouble than They’re Worth?” (Editorial). Planning Theory & Practice9 (3): 299–304. doi:10.1080/14649350802277035.
19.
GallentNick. 2013. “Re-Connecting ‘People and Planning’: Parish Plans and the English Localism Agenda.” Town Planning Review84 (3): 371–96. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.20.
20.
Gemeente Berkelland. 2015. “ACTIE IN DE ‘DOE-HET-SAMEN SAMENLEVING.’ Ontwikkelprogramma veranderende samenleving, vernieuwd bestuur [A campaign for the “do-it-together-society.” Development program changing society, renewed governance].” Borculo: Gemeente Berkelland.
21.
HallPeter G.Tewdwr-JonesMark. 2010. Urban and Regional Planning. 5th ed.London: Routledge.
22.
HalleuxJean-MarieMarcinczakSzymonvan der KrabbenErwin. 2012. “The Adaptive Efficiency of Land Use Planning Measured by the Control of Urban Sprawl. The Cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland.” Land Use Policy29 (4): 887–98. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.008.
HealeyPatsy. 2012. “The Universal and the Contingent: Some Reflections on the Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices.” Planning Theory11 (2): 188–207. doi:10.1177/1473095211419333.
25.
HealeyPatsy. 2015. “Civil Society Enterprise and Local Development.” Planning Theory & Practice16 (1): 11–27. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.995212.
26.
HillierJean. 2001. “Imagined Value: The Poetics and Politics of Place.” In The Governance of Place. Space and Planning Processes, edited by MandanipourAliHullAngelaHealeyPatsy, 69–101. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
27.
HospersGert-Jan. 2014. “Policy Responses to Urban Shrinkage: From Growth Thinking to Civic Engagement.” European Planning Studies22 (7): 1507–23.
28.
InnesJudith E.ConnickSarahBooherDavid. 2007. “Informality as a Planning Strategy. Collaborative Water Management in the CALFED Bay-Delta Program.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (2): 195–210. doi:10.1080/01944360708976153.
29.
JonkmanArend. 2012. “Doe-het-zelf-gebiedsontwikkeling: afboeken en uitgeven [Do-it-yourself-urban development: Write off and spend].” Rooilijn45 (2): 106–9.
30.
KeatingMichael. 2001. “Rethinking the Region. Culture, Institutions and Economic Development in Cataluña and Galicia.” European Urban and Regional Studies8 (3): 217–234. doi:10.1177/096977640100800304.
31.
KempenaarAnnetvan LieropMarjoWesterinkJudithvan der ValkArnoldvan den BrinkAdri. 2016. “Change of Thought: Findings on Planning for Shrinkage from a Regional Design Competition.” Planning Practice & Research31:23–40. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1088242.
McFarlaneColin. 2012. “Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City.” Planning Theory & Practice13 (1): 89–108. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649951.
34.
McFarlaneColinWaibelMichael. 2012. Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
35.
MeijerMarliesDiaz-VarelaEmilioCardín-PedrosaMarta. 2015. “Planning Practices in Galicia: How Communities Compensate the Lack of Statutory Planning Using Bottom Up Planning Initiatives.” Spanish Journal of Rural Development6 (1–2): 65–80.
36.
MeijerMarliesSyssnerJosefina. 2017. “Getting Ahead in Depopulating Areas—How Linking Social Capital is Used for Informal Planning Practices in Sweden and the Netherlands.” Journal of Rural Studies55:59–70. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.014.
37.
MeijerMarliesvan der KrabbenErwin. 2018. “Informal Institutional Change in De Achterhoek Region: From Citizen Initiatives to Participatory Governance.” European Planning Studies26 (4): 745–67. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1424119.
38.
MelisKorrie. 2011. “Participatie als oplossing voor krimp [Participation as a panacea for shrinkage].” Rooilijn44 (5): 340–345.
39.
MukhijaVinitLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2014. The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40.
MukhijaVinitLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2015. “Reading the Informal City: Why and How to Deepen Planners’ Understanding of Informality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35:444–54. doi:10.1177/0739456x15591586.
41.
NeedhamBarrie. 2014. Dutch Land-Use Planning: The Principles and the Practice. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
42.
PereraNihal. 2009. “People’s Spaces: Familiarization, Subject Formation and Emergent Spaces in Colombo.” Planning Theory8 (1): 51–75. doi:10.1177/1473095208099298.
43.
PojaniDorinaSteadDominic. 2015. “Going Dutch? The Export of Sustainable Land-Use and Transport Planning Concepts from the Netherlands.” Urban Studies52 (9): 1558–76. doi:10.1177/0042098014562326.
44.
PorterLibby. 2011a. “Informality, the Commons and the Paradoxes for Planning: Concepts and Debates for Informality and Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice12 (1): 115–53. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.545626.
45.
PorterLibby. 2011b. “The Point is to Change It.” Planning Theory & Practice12 (4): 477–80. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.626296.
46.
Provincie Gelderland. 2013. “Gevolgen bevolkingskrimp te lijf met nieuwe initiatieven [Compensating for population decline with new initiatives].” Gelderland Leeft. Arnhem: Provincie Gelderland.
47.
RoyAnanya. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (2): 147–58.
48.
RoyAnanya. 2009a. “Strangely Familiar: Planning and the Worlds of Insurgence and Informality.” Planning Theory8 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1177/1473095208099294.
49.
RoyAnanya. 2009b. “Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence and the Idiom of Urbanization.” Planning Theory8 (1): 76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299.
50.
SimoneAbdouMaliq. 2004. For the City yet to Come: Changing African Life in Four Cities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
51.
SyssnerJosefinaMeijerMarlies. 2017. “Informal Planning in Depopulating Rural Areas. A Resource-Based View on Informal Planning Practices.” European Countryside9 (3):15. doi:10.1515/euco-2017-0027.
52.
UrhahnGert. 2010. The Spontaneous City. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
53.
van DamRosalieEshuisJasperAartsNoëlle. 2008. “Zelforganisatie.” In Een studie naar gemeenschapsvorming in de Amsterdamse Doe-het-Zelf Maatschappij en de Golfresidentie Dronten [Self organisation. A study into community development processes in the Amsterdam DIY Society and Golf Residence Dronten]. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
54.
van der SteenMartijinScherpenisseJorrenHajerMaarten A.GerwenOlav-JanKruitwagenSonja. 2015. Learning by Doing: Government Participation in an Energetic Society. The Hague: Nederlandse School voor Openbaar Bestuur.
55.
van HeekPeter. 2011. “Dorpsaccommodatie Rietmolen (DAR) na 13 jaar voorbereiding geopend [Village center Rietmolen opened after 13 years of preperation].” Kennisplatform Bewoners, September18. http://www.kennisplatformbewoners.nl/node/4100.
56.
Vereniging Kleine Kernen Gelderland. 2009. “Bevindingen monitoring uitvoering dorpsplannen [Results village plan monitor].” Zelhem: Vereniging Kleine Kernen Gelderland.
57.
Vereniging Kleine Kernen Gelderland. 2011. “Een dorpsplan maken: Leefbaarheid in perspectief [Developing a village plan: Liveability into perspective].” Brochure. Zelhem: Vereniging Kleine Kernen Gelderland.
VerwestFemkevan DamFrank. 2010. “Van bestrijden naar begeleiden: demografische krimp in Nederland [From control to guidance: Demographic decline in The Netherlands].” edited by de LeefomgevingPlanbureau voor. The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
60.
WatsonVanessa. 2008. “Down to Earth: Linking Planning Theory and Practice in the ‘Metropole’ and Beyond.” International Planning Studies13 (3): 223–37. doi:10.1080/13563470802521408.
61.
WatsonVanessa. 2009. “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues.” Urban Studies46 (11): 2259–75. doi:10.1177/0042098009342598.
62.
WatsonVanessa. 2012. “Planning and the ‘Stubborn Realities’ of Global South-East Cities: Some Emerging Ideas.” Planning Theory12 (1): 81–100.
