Zoning relief, the process of exempting individual properties from land-use regulations, is a widespread yet underexplored planning practice. A mixed-methods analysis of applications to the Board of Standards and Appeals in New York City between 1998 and 2017 examines three clusters of zoning relief. The results suggest a strong relationship between relief and neighborhood socio-political capital and underscore relief as a powerful form of ad hoc planning. Zoning relief practices in New York City deepen inequalities but also facilitate planning goals such as disaster recovery and allowing families to grow in place. Zoning relief has long-lasting consequences on urban development and deserves increased attention from planning scholars.
AltermanRachelle. 1980. “Decision-Making in Urban Plan Implementation: Does the Dog Wag the Tail or the Tail Wag the Dog?” Urban Law and Policy3(1):41–58.
2.
TomAngottiMorseSylvia, eds. 2016. Zoned Out! Race, Displacement, and City Planning in New York City. Brooklyn: Terreform.
BaeHyun Hye. 2017. “Impact Evaluation of NYC Community Board Recommendations in Uniform Land Use Review Procedure.” Presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, Denver, CO, October13.
5.
BeauregardRobert A.2015. Planning Matter: Acting with Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BooneChristopher G.ModarresAli. 1999. “Creating a Toxic Neighborhood in Los Angeles County: A Historical Examination of Environmental Inequity.” Urban Affairs Review35(2):163–87.
BrownL. DavidAshmanDarcy. 1996. “Participation, Social Capital, and Intersectoral Problem Solving: African and Asian Cases.” World Development24(9):1467–79.
12.
BullardRobert D.WrightBeverly. 2009. Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Boulder: Westview Press.
CohenJonathan E.1994. “A Constitutional Safety Valve: The Variance in Zoning and Land-Use Based Environmental Controls.” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review22:307.
CreswellJohn W.2007. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
CurranWinifred. 2007. “‘From the Frying Pan to the Oven’: Gentrification and the Experience of Industrial Displacement in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.” Urban Studies44(8):1427–40.
19.
EllicksonRobert C.TarlockA. Dan. 1981. Land-Use Controls: Cases and Materials. New York: Aspen Publishers.
20.
EtzioniAmitai. 1967. “Mixed-Scanning: A ‘Third’ Approach to Decision-Making.” Public Administration Review27(5):385–92.
21.
EvansPeter. 1996. “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy.” World Development24(6):1119–32.
22.
FagaBarbara. 2014. “Formers Versus Zoners: How and Why Communities Shift to Form-Based Zoning.” PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
23.
FainsteinSusan. 2005. “Eminent Domain Benefits Developers, Not the Public.” Gotham Gazette: New York City News and Politics12.
24.
FawazMona. 2017. “Exceptions and the Actually Existing Practice of Planning: Beirut (Lebanon) as Case Study.” Urban Studies54(8):1938–55.
25.
FischelWilliam A.2015. Zoning Rules!: The Economics of Land Use Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
26.
FischlerRaphael. 1998. “The Metropolitan Dimension of Early Zoning: Revisiting the 1916 New York City Ordinance.” Journal of the American Planning Association64(2):170–88.
27.
FlyvbjergBent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Furman Center. 2013. Sandy’s Effects on Housing in New York City (Fact Brief). New York: Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy and the Moelis Institute for Affordable Housing Policy.
29.
GoldwynEricRennerAndrea. 2017. “Unseen Machine: Codes of Conduct.” Urban Omnibus, January12.
30.
GoodmanLizzy. 2017. Meet Me in the Bathroom: Rebirth and Rock and Roll in New York City 2001–2011. New York: Harper Collins.
31.
GrahamLeighDebucquoyWimAnguelovskiIsabelle. 2016. “The Influence of Urban Development Dynamics on Community Resilience Practice in New York City after Superstorm Sandy: Experiences from the Lower East Side and the Rockaways.” Global Environmental Change40:112–24.
32.
HajerMaarten A.1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33.
HealeyPatsy. 1996. “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23(2):217–34.
34.
HealeyPatsy. 1998. “Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning.” Environment and Planning A30(9):1531–46.
35.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding.” World Politics22(3):329–43.
36.
HirtSonia. 2013. “Home, Sweet Home: American Residential Zoning in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33:292–309.
37.
HirtSonia. 2014. Zoned in the USA: The Origins and Implications of American Land-Use Regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
HumTarry. 2010. “Planning in Neighborhoods with Multiple Publics: Opportunities and Challenges for Community-Based Nonprofit Organizations.” Journal of Planning Education and Research29(4):461–77.
39.
JCC of Marine Park. 2018. “Community Highlights, Home Improvement.” The Jewish Echo, October.
40.
KaydenJerold S.1992. “Market-Based Regulatory Approaches: A Comparative Discussion of Environmental and Land Use Techniques in the United States.” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review19(11):565–80.
41.
KlinenbergEric. 2013. “Adaptation.” The New Yorker, January.
42.
KwartlerMichael. 1989. “Legislating Aesthetics: The Role of Zoning in Designing Cities.” In Zoning and the American Dream, edited by HaarCharles M.KaydenJerold S, 187–220. New York: Routledge.
LanderBradWolf-PowersLaura. 2004. Remaking New York City: Can Prosperity Be Shared and Sustainable?Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Departmental Papers (City and Regional Planning).
45.
LevineJonathan. 2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use. New York: Routledge.
46.
LindblomCharles E.1959. “The Science of’ Muddling through.’” Public Administration Review19(2):79–88.
47.
MaloneyWilliamStokerGerrySmithGraham. 2000. “Social Capital and Urban Governance: Adding a More Contextualized ‘Top-Down’ Perspective.” Political Studies48(4):802–20.
48.
MarcusePeter. 1987. “Neighborhood Policy and the Distribution of Power: New York City’s Community Boards.” Policy Studies Journal16(2):277–89.
49.
MashayekhiR.2017. “The Battle Over New York City’s Board of Standards and Appeals.” Commercial Observer, October11.
MooreKathryn L.2011. “The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Board of Adjustment: Fifty Years Later.” Kentucky Law Journal100:435–529.
52.
MukhijaVinitLoukaitou-SiderisAnastasia. 2015. “Reading the Informal City: Why and How to Deepen Planners’ Understanding of Informality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35(4):444–54.
53.
Municipal Art Society. 2005. “Zoning Variances and the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals.” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law30(1):193–247.
OstromElinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
OwensDavid W.2004. “The Zoning Variance: Reappraisal and Recommendations for Reform of a Much-Maligned Tool.” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law29(2):279–322.
58.
ParrisAdam. 2014. “How Hurricane Sandy Tamed the Bureaucracy.” Issues in Science and Technology4:83–90.
59.
PressmanJeffrey L.WildavskyAaron. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland: Or, Why It’s Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
RepkingJames R.ParadiseKathryn J. 2009. “Zone Defense: Developers Should Consider More Legally Defensible Alternatives to Zoning Variances.” Los Angeles Lawyer32(5):31–35.
62.
Report of the City Planning Commission on the Comprehensive Amendment of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York. 1960. New York: Department of City Planning.
63.
RevellKeith D.2003. Building Gotham: Civic Culture and Public Policy in New York City, 1898–1938. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
RiesmanJean A.1990. Rules of the Game: Rezoning Boston, 1984–1989. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
66.
RojasJames. 2010. “Latino Urbanism in Los Angeles.” In Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities, edited by HouJeffrey, 36–44. New York: Routledge.
RosenzweigCynthiaSoleckiWilliam. 2014. “Hurricane Sandy and Adaptation Pathways in New York: Lessons from a First-Responder City.” Global Environmental Change28:395–408.
69.
RydinYvonnePenningtonMark. 2000. “Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital.” Local Environment5(2):153–69.
70.
SampsonRobert J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
SchmeltzMichael T.GonzálezSonia K.FuentesLizaKwanAmyOrtega-WilliamsAnnaCowanLisa Pilar. 2013. “Lessons from Hurricane Sandy: A Community Response in Brooklyn, New York.” Journal of Urban Health90(5):799–809.
72.
SchroetlinScott.2011. “Hardship and the Granting of Zoning Variances: A New Test in Light of Rousseau v. Zoning Board of Appeals.” Nebraska Law Review89(4):1171.
73.
SchumakerPaul. 2013. “Group Involvements in City Politics and Pluralist Theory.” Urban Affairs Review49(2):254–81.
74.
SelznickPhilip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
75.
ShapiroRonald M.1969. “The Zoning Variance Power-Constructive in Theory, Destructive in Practice.” Maryland Law Review29:3.
SteinSam. 2016. “Chinatown: Unprotected and Undone.” In Zoned Out! Race, Displacement, and City Planning in New York City, edited by TomAngottiMorseSylvia. New York: Terreform.
TrudeauDaniel. 2006. “Politics of Belonging in the Construction of Landscapes: Place-Making, Boundary-Drawing and Exclusion.” Cultural Geographies13(3):421–43.
WhittemoreAndrew H.2012. “Zoning Los Angeles: A Brief History of Four Regimes.” Planning Perspectives27(3):393–415.
84.
WhittemoreAndrew H.2016. “The Experience of Racial and Ethnic Minorities with Zoning in the United States.” Journal of Planning Literature32(1):16–27.
85.
WhittemoreAndrew H.2017. “Racial and Class Bias in Zoning: Rezonings Involving Heavy Commercial and Industrial Land Use in Durham (NC), 1945–2014.” Journal of the American Planning Association83(3):235–48.
86.
WilliamsFrank B.1922. The Law of City Planning and Zoning. New York: Macmillan Press.
87.
Wolf-PowersLauren. 2005. “Up-Zoning New York City’s Mixed-Use Neighborhoods: Property-Led Economic Development and the Anatomy of a Planning Dilemma.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24(4):379–93.
