The development of global metrics for evaluating university research performance has been accompanied by increasing attention to key performance metrics for individual disciplines. This paper examines research performance metrics for Australian planning academics. It addresses questions related to programs, staff, publications, and citations. The main findings are the following: Wide gender gaps exist in Australian planning academia; the mean number of publications is 36 per person, or 3 per person per year; the mean number of citations is 527 per person, or 48 per person per year; and planning journal impact factors are low (less than 3).
AguilloIsidro. 2012. “Is Google Scholar Useful for Bibliometrics? A Webometric Analysis.” Scientometrics91 (2): 343–51.
2.
AsmarChristine. 1999. “Is There a Gendered Agenda in Academia? The Research Experience of Female and Male PhD Graduates in Australian Universities.” Higher Education38:255–73.
BornmannLutzHans-DieterDaniel. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation64 (1): 45–80.
6.
BornmannLutzHans-DieterDaniel. 2009. “The State of h-index Research. Is the h-index the Ideal Way to Measure Research Performance?” EMBO Reports10 (1): 2–6.
7.
BrembsBjörnButtonKatherineMunafòMarcus. 2013. “Deep Impact: Unintended Consequences of Journal Rank.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.
8.
ByrneJason. 2017. “Tracing the History of Australian Planning Research and Its Influence on Practice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Australian Urban and Regional Planning, edited by VellaK.SipeN.SchooensT., 335–53. New York: Routledge.
9.
CampbellPhilip. 2008. “Escape from the Impact Factor.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics8:5–7.
10.
CheckowayBarry. 1997. “Reinventing the Research University for Public Service.” Journal of Planning Literature11 (3): 307–19.
11.
ConnellRaewyn. 2015. “Australian Universities under Neoliberal Management: The Deepening Crisis.” International Higher Education81:23–25.
FrankNancy. 2008. “Measuring Public Service: Assessment and Accountability—To Ourselves and Others.” Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (4): 499–506.
14.
HarzingAnne-Wil. 2010. The Publish or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research.
15.
HicksD.2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy41 (2): 251–61.
16.
HirschJorge. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102 (46): 16569–72.
17.
HurtChristineYinTung. 2006. “Blogging while Untenured and Other Extreme Sports.” Washington University Law Review84 (5): 1235–55.
18.
HylandKen. 2016. Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JönsH.HoylerM. 2013. “Global Geographies of Higher Education: The Perspective of World University Rankings.” Geoforum46:45–59.
21.
KoushaKayvanThelwallMike. 2008. “Sources of Google Scholar Citations outside the Science Citation Index: A Comparison between Four Science Disciplines.” Scientometrics74 (2): 273–94.
22.
KoushaKayvanThelwallMikeRezaieSomayeh. 2010. “Using the Web for Research Evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact Indicator.” Journal of Informetrics4 (1): 124–35.
23.
KrumholzNorman. 1986. “From Planning Practice to Academia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research6 (1): 60–65.
24.
PojaniDorinaOlvera-GarciaJaimeByrneJasonSipe.Neil2018. “Australian Cities Are Crying Out for Better Planning, but the Research Funding Is Missing.” The Conversation, February23, 2018.
25.
PostmanNeil. 1993. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage.
26.
PriemJasonTaraborelliDarioGrothPaulNeylonCameron. 2010. “Altmetrics: A Manifesto.” Accessed November 9, 2016. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
27.
RiordanSarah. 2011. “Paths to Success in Senior Management.” In Gender, Power and Management: A Cross Cultural Analysis of Higher Education, edited by BagilholeB.WhiteK., 110–39. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
SanchezTom. 2014. “Academic Visibility for Urban Planning and the Webometric Future.” Journal of the World Universities Program6 (2): 37–52.
SimonsKai. 2008. “The Misused Impact Factor.” Science322 (5899): 165.
33.
SpainDaphne. 1992. “Creating and Defending Links between Teaching, Research, and Public Service.” Journal of Planning Education and Research12 (1): 77–79.
34.
StevensGarry. 1990. “An Alliance Confirmed Planning Literature and the Social Sciences.” Journal of the American Planning Association56 (3): 341–49.
35.
StiftelBruceRukmanaDedenAlamBhuiyan. 2004. “A National Research Council-Style Study.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24:6–22.
36.
TaylorPaulBraddockRichard. 2007. “International University Ranking Systems and the Idea of University Excellence.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management29 (3): 245–60.
37.
ThoreauHenry David. 1854. Walden, and on the Duty of Civil Disobedience. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.
38.
TroyPatrick. 2013. “Australian Urban Research and Planning.” Urban Policy and Research31(2):134–49.
39.
WachsMartin. 1994. “The Case for Practitioner Faculty.” Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 290–96.
40.
WhiteKate. 2001. “Women in the Professoriate in Australia.” International Journal of Organisational Behaviour3 (2): 64–76.
41.
WiewelWimCarlsonVirginiaFriedmanSuzanne. 1996. “Planning the New Urban University: The Role of Planning Departments.” Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (2): 127–35.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
