Universities are expanding their missions to encompass neighborhoods and revitalization strategies, yet there is an inadequate understanding of how targeted neighborhoods have changed. This study combines institutional survey data with 1990 and 2010 Census metrics to examine twenty-two neighborhoods with university revitalization initiatives. It explores market and socioeconomic change for target tracts relative to their regions, finding significant positive changes in target tract median home and rent values. The research suggests universities use revitalization efforts to respond to place-based deficits and, in doing so, align their neighborhoods with concurrent national trends toward growing enrollment and urban revitalization.
AdamsCarolyn T.2014. From the Outside in: Suburban Elites, Third-Sector Organizations, and the Reshaping of Philadelphia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
BartonMichael. 2016. “An Exploration of the Importance of the Strategy Used to Identify Gentrification.” Urban Studies53 (1): 92–111.
4.
BensonLeeHarkavyIra. 2000. “Higher Education’s Third Revolution: The Emergence of the Democratic Cosmopolitan Civic University.” Cityscape5 (1): 47–57.
5.
BirchEugenie L.2007. “Hopeful Signs: US Urban Revitalization in the Twenty-First Century.” In Land Policies and Their Outcomes, edited by IngramGregory K.HongYu-Hung. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
6.
BoseS.2015. “Universities and the Redevelopment Politics of the Neoliberal City.” Urban Studies52 (14): 2616–32.
7.
BromleyRayKentRobert B.2006. “Integrating beyond the Campus: Ohio’s Urban Public Universities and Neighborhood Revitalisation.” Planning, Practice & Research21 (1): 45–78.
DubbSteveMcKinleySarahHowardTed. 2013. Achieving the Anchor Promise: Improving Outcomes for Low-Income Children, Families, and Communities. College Park, MD: The Democracy Collaborative at the University of Maryland.
19.
DubbSteveMcKinleySarahHowardTed, and Democracy Collaborative. 2013. The Anchor Dashboard: Aligning Institutional Practice to Meet Low-Income Community Needs. College Park, MD: The Democracy Collaborative at the University of Maryland.
20.
EhlenzMeagan M.2015. “Anchoring Communities: The Impact of University Interventions on Neighborhood Revitalization.” Dissertations Available from ProQuest. Paper AA13709453 (January): 1–294. http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3709453.
21.
EhlenzMeagan M.2016a. “Neighborhood Revitalization and the Anchor Institution Assessing the Impact of the University of Pennsylvania’s West Philadelphia Initiatives on University City.” Urban Affairs Review52 (5): 714–50.
22.
EhlenzMeagan M.2016b. “(Re)defining the University as an Anchor Institution.” Working paper, Arizona State University. https://repository.asu.edu/items/45686.
23.
EtienneHarley F.2012. Pushing Back the Gates: Neighborhood Perspectives on University-Driven Revitalization in West Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
24.
FreemanLance. 2005. “Displacement or Succession? Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods.” Urban Affairs Review40 (4): 463–91.
25.
FriedmanDebraPerryDavid C.MenendezCarrie. 2014. “The Foundational Role of Universities as Anchor Institutions in Urban Development: A Report of National Data and Survey Findings.” Coalition of Urban Serving Universities.
26.
Fulbright-AndersonKarenAusposPatriciaAndersonAndrea. 2001. Community Involvement in Partnerships with Educational Institutions, Medical Centers, and Utility Companies. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
GalsterGeorgeTatianPeterAccordinoJohn. 2006. “Targeting Investments for Neighborhood Revitalization.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (4): 457–74.
29.
GalsterGeorgeWalkerChristopherHayesChristopherBoxallPatrickJohnsonJennifer. 2004. “Measuring the Impact of Community Development Block Grant Spending on Urban Neighborhoods.” Housing Policy Debate15 (4): 903–34.
30.
HarkavyIraHodgesRita Axelroth. 2012. “Democratic Devolution: How America’s Colleges and Universities Can Strengthen Their Communities.” Progressive Policy Institute.
31.
HarkavyIraZuckermanHarmon. 1999. “Eds and Meds: Cities’ Hidden Assets.” Survey Series. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
32.
HodgesRita AxelrothDubb.Steve2012. The Road Half Traveled: University Engagement at a Crossroads. 2011. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
HubbardPhil. 2009. “Geographies of Studentification and Purpose-Built Student Accommodation: Leading Separate Lives?”Environment and Planning A41 (8): 1903–23.
35.
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. 2014. “Measuring Anchor Institution Impact.” Webinar presented at the What Works Webinar, Boston, MA.
KleimanNeilGetsingerLizaPindusNancyPoethigErika. 2015. Striking a (Local) Grand Bargain: How Cities and Anchors Can Work Together to Drive Growth and Prosperity. Washington, DC: National Resource Network.
40.
KromerJohnKermanLucy. 2005. West Philadelphia Initiatives: A Case Study in Urban Revitalization. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Fels Institute of Government.
PattersonKelly L.SilvermanRobert Mark, eds. 2014. Schools and Urban Revitalization: Rethinking Institutions and Community Development. Community Development Research and Practice Series, volume 1. New York: Routledge.
46.
PerryDavid C.MenendezCarrie. 2010. Urban Universities as Anchor Institutions: A Report of National Data and Survey Findings. Washington, DC: Coalition of Urban Serving Universities.
47.
PerryDavid C.WiewelWim. 2005. The University as Urban Developer: Case Studies and Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
48.
PerryDavid C.WiewelWimMenendezCarrie. 2009. “The University’s Role in Urban Development: From Enclave to Anchor Institution.” Land Lines, July.
49.
RevingtonNick. 2017. “Pathways and Processes: Reviewing the Role of Young Adults in Urban Structure.” Professional Geographer1–10.
50.
RodinJudith. 2005. “The 21st Century Urban University: New Roles for Practice and Research.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (3): 237–49.
51.
RodinJudith. 2007. The University and Urban Revival. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
52.
SackettChase. 2015. “Barriers to Success: Housing Insecurity for US College Students.” Insights into Housing and Community Development Policy. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
53.
SchillMichael H.EllenIngrid GouldSchwartzAmy EllenVoicuIoan. 2002. “Revitalizing Inner-City Neighborhoods: New York City’s Ten-Year Plan.” Housing Policy Debate13 (3): 529–66.
54.
SchoferEvanMeyerJohn W.2005. “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review70 (6): 898–920.
55.
SilvermanRobert MarkPattersonKelly L.YinLiWuLaiyun. 2015. “Neighborhood Characteristics and the Location of HUD-Subsidized Housing in Shrinking Cities: An Analysis to Inform Anchor-Based Urban Revitalization Strategies.” Community Development46 (5): 632–51.
56.
SageJoannaSmithDarrenHubbardPhil. 2012. “The Rapidity of Studentification and Population Change: There Goes the (Student)hood.” Population, Space and Place18 (5): 597–613.
57.
SmithDarren. 2008. “The Politics of Studentification and ‘(Un)balanced’ Urban Populations: Lessons for Gentrification and Sustainable Communities?” Urban Studies45 (12): 2541–64.
SnyderThomas D.de BreyCristobalDillowSally A.2016. “Digest of Education Statistics 2015, 51st Edition.” NCES 2016-014. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
60.
Sungu-EryilmazYesim. 2009. Town-Gown Collaboration in Land Use and Development. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
61.
TaylorHenry LouisLuterGavin. 2013. Anchor Institutions: An Interpretive Review Essay. New York: Anchor Institutions Task Force.
ZielenbachSean. 2003. “Assessing Economic Change in HOPE VI Neighborhoods.” Housing Policy Debate14 (4): 621–55.
65.
ZuckermanDavid. 2013. Hospitals Building Healthier Communities: Embracing the Anchor Mission. College Park, MD: The Democracy Collaborative at the University of Maryland.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
