This article analyzes the pedagogy of an urban sociology course taught in prison, with both outside and imprisoned students. The course examined the production of knowledge used in the field of planning and sought to facilitate the coproduction of new insights about urban inequality. Participant observation, focus groups, and students’ written reflections reveal that, in comparison to traditional classroom settings, students explored with greater complexity their embodiment of multiple social identities, wrestled more deeply with the structural embeddedness of individual agency, and situated their personal experiences in a broader theoretical narrative about urban inequality. Building trust in the face of significant power disparities within the classroom was essential to learning. The findings highlight the importance of new locations of learning that enable classrooms to become contact zones, pushing students to collaboratively reimagine justice in the city with those outside the traditional classroom.
AgyemanJulianEricksonJennifer Sien. 2012. “Culture, Recognition, and the Negotiation of Difference: Some Thoughts on Cultural Competency in Planning Education.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (3): 358–66.
2.
AndersonElijah. 1999. Code of the Street. New York: Norton.
3.
AppaduraiArjun. 2006. “The Right to Research.” Globalisation, Societies and Education4 (2): 167–77.
4.
AvilaEric. 2014. “L.A.’s Invisible Freeway Revolt: The Cultural Politics of Fighting Freeways.” Journal of Urban History40 (5): 831–42.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation.” American Sociological Review62 (3): 465–80.
6.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJohn, 46–58. New York: Greenwood.
7.
BrandAnna Livia. 2015. “The Politics of Defining and Building Equity in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (3): 249–64.
8.
BrintSteven. 2001. “Gemeinschaft Revisited: A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept.” Sociological Theory19 (1): 1–23.
9.
BrooksMichaelWuWeiping. 2012. “Commentary Writing Papers on Pedagogy.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (4): 491–92.
10.
BurtRonald S.2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology110 (2): 349–99.
CampbellHeather. 2012. “Planning to Change the World: Between Knowledge and Action Lies Synthesis.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (2): 135–46.
13.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94 (1): 95–120.
14.
ConnollyJamesSteilJustin. 2009. “Finding Justice in the City.” In Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice, edited by MarcuseP.ConnollyJ.NovyJ.OlivoI.PotterC.SteilJ., 1–16. London: Routledge.
15.
DewarMargaretIsaacClaudia B.2012. “Learning from Difference: The Potentially Transforming Experience of Community-University Collaboration.” Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 334–47.
16.
Du BoisW. E. B. 1903. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.
17.
FanonFrantz. 1964. Toward the African Revolution: Political Essays. New York: Grove Press.
18.
FineMichelleTorreMaria Elena. 2004. “Re-membering Exclusions: Participatory Action Research in Public Institutions.” Qualitative Research in Psychology1 (1): 15–37.
19.
FischerClaude S.1975. “Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism.” American Journal of Sociology80 (6): 1319–41.
20.
ForesterJohn. 1988. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
FreirePaulo. (1970) 1993. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
22.
FoucaultMichel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
23.
GansHerbert J.1962. The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
24.
GothamKevin Fox. 1999. “Political Opportunity, Community Identity, and the Emergence of a Local Anti-Expressway Movement.” Social Problems46 (3): 332–54.
25.
GouldRoger V.2003. Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1360–80.
27.
HarneyStephen MatthiasMotenFred. 2013. The Undercommons: Fugitive Study and Black Study. New York: Minor Compositions.
28.
hooksbell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge.
29.
JohnstonAndrew S.2015. “CitySection: A Pedagogy for Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration in Planning and Environmental Design.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (1): 86–92.
30.
KelleyRobin D.2001. Yo’mama’s Disfunktional!: Fighting the Culture Wars in Urban America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
31.
LinNan. 1999. “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital.” Connections22 (1): 28–51.
32.
LongJudith Grant. 2012. “State of the Studio: Revisiting the Potential of Studio Pedagogy in U.S.-Based Planning Programs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (4): 431–48.
33.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
NémethJeremyLongJudith Grant. 2012. “Assessing Learning Outcomes in U.S. Planning Studio Courses.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (4): 476–90.
35.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1986. Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
36.
PortesAlejandroSensenbrennerJulia. 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.” American Journal of Sociology98 (6): 1320–50.
37.
PrattMary Louise. 1991. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession1991:33–40.
38.
RitzdorfMarsha. 1993. “The Fairy’s Tale: Teaching Planning and Public Policy in a Different Voice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research12 (2): 99–106.
39.
SampsonRobert J.LoefflerCharles. 2010. “Punishment’s Place: The Local Concentration of Mass Incarceration.” Daedalus139 (3): 20–31.
40.
SandercockLeonieAttiliGiovanni, eds. 2010. Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning: Beyond the Flatlands. New York: Springer.
41.
ShorIra. 1992. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
ShorrisEarl. 2013. The Art of Freedom: Teaching the Humanities to the Poor. New York City: Norton.
43.
SimmelGeorg. 1950. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In The Sociology of George Simmel, translated by WolffKurt H., 409–24. New York: Free Press.
44.
SlettoBjørn. 2012. “Insurgent Planning and Its Interlocutors: Studio Pedagogy as Unsanctioned Practice in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (2): 228–40.
45.
SlettoBjørn. 2010. “Education Reflective Practitioners: Learning to Embrace the Unexpected through Service Learning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (4): 403–15.
46.
SteilJustinDe la RocaJorgeEllenIngrid G.2015. “Desvinculado y Desigual: Latino Segregation and Access to Opportunity.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science660 (1): 57–76.
47.
SteilJustinMartinezAriannaJohnsonRashaunaDaftary-SteelSarita. 2015. “Prisons and Teaching: Destabilizing the Margins and Center.” Progressive Planning205:33–36.
48.
ThomasJune ManningRitzdorfMarsha. 1997. Planning and the African-American Community: In the Shadows. New York: Sage.
49.
TönniesFerdinand. 1887. Community and Society, translated by LoomisC. P.East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
50.
UmemotoKare. 2001. “Walking in Another’s Shoes Epistemological Challenges in Participatory Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (1): 17–31.
51.
WellmanBarry. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology84:1201–31.
52.
WirthLous. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” American Journal of Sociology44 (1): 1–24.
53.
WuJean Y.2010. “Race Matters in Civic Engagement Work.” Asian American Studies Now: A Critical Reader, 581–602.
54.
YoungIris Marion. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
