Grounded theory is a rigorous methodology that supports the study of complex urban phenomena. This article provides an overview of a constructivist approach to grounded theory and its associated research methods and argues for its wider adoption in urban research. This article asserts that grounded theory is a tool that can provide researchers across the built environment research fields a way in which to develop theory that is inductively based. The methodological considerations that underpin a constructivist approach to grounded theory are explained. Two examples of the application of constructivist grounded theory are presented to illustrate the broad-ranging applicability of this methodology in urban research.
AllenNatalie. 2016. “Quality of Urban Life and Intensification: Understanding Housing Choices, Trade-offs, and the Role of Urban Amenities” PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
2.
AllmendingerPhilHaughtonGraham. 2009. “Critical Reflections on Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning A41 (11): 2544–49.
3.
AndradeAntonio D.2009. “Interpretive Research Aiming at Theory Building: Adopting and Adapting the Case Study Designs.” Qualitative Report14 (1): 42–60.
4.
CharmazKathy. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S. 509–35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CharmazKathy. 2005. “Grounded Theory in the 21st Century: Applications for Advancing Social Justice Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by DenzinNorman K.LincolnYvonna S., 507–35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CharmazKathy.2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage; 2006.
7.
CharmazKathyBryantAntony. 2011. “Grounded Theory and Credibility.” In Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice, 3rd ed., edited by SilvermanDavid, 291–309. London: Sage.
8.
ChristiansenÓlavur. 2011. “The Literature Review in Classic Grounded Theory Studies: A Methodological Note.” Grounded Theory Review10 (3): 21–25.
9.
CreswellJohn W.2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
DaveyMark. 2014. “The Promise of Spatial Planning in Auckland’s New ‘Super-City’: Rhetoric and Reality.” PhD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
11.
ElliottNaomiLazenbattAnne. 2005. “How to Recognize a ‘Quality’ Grounded Theory Research Study.” Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing22 (3): 48–52.
12.
EvansGary L.2013. “A Novice Researcher’s First Walk through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory.” Grounded Theory Review12 (1): 37–55.
13.
FaludiAndreas. 2002. “Positioning European Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies10 (7): 897–909.
14.
FendtJacquelineSachsWladimir. 2008. “Grounded Theory Method in Management Research Users’ Perspectives.” Organizational Research Methods11 (3): 430–55.
15.
FernándezWalter D.LehmannHans. 2005. “Achieving Rigour and Relevance in Information Systems Studies: Using Grounded Theory to Investigate Organizational Cases.” Grounded Theory Review1 (5): 79–107.
16.
FirestoneWilliam A.1987. “Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Educational Researcher16:16–21.
GlaserBarney G.Strauss.Anselm L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
23.
GouldingChristina. 1998. “Grounded Theory: The Missing Methodology on the Interpretivist Agenda.” Qualitative Market Research1 (1): 50–57.
24.
GouldingChristina. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage.
25.
GouldingChristina. 2005. “Grounded Theory, Ethnography and Phenomenology: A Comparative Analysis of Three Qualitative Strategies for Marketing Research.” European Journal of Marketing39 (3/4): 294–308.
26.
GuptaBabitaIyerLakshmi S.AronsonJay E.2000. “Knowledge Management: Practices and Challenges.” Industrial Management and Data Systems100 (1): 17–21.
27.
HeathHelenCowleySarah. 2004. “Developing a Grounded Theory Approach: A Comparison of Glaser and Strauss.” International Journal of Nursing Studies41: 141–50.
28.
HoltonJudith A.2010. “The Coding Process and Its Challenges.” Grounded Theory Review9 (1): 21–38.
29.
HouseErnest R.1994. “Integrating the Quantitative and Qualitative.” New Directions for Program Evaluation61: 13–23.
30.
JonesMichaelAlonyIrit. 2011. “Guiding the Use of Ground Theory in Doctoral Studies—An Example from the Australian Film Industry.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies6: 94–114.
31.
KempsterStephenParryKen W.2011. “Grounded Theory and Leadership Research: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Leadership Quarterly22 (1): 106–20.
32.
LeitchClaire M.HillFrances M.HarrisonRichard T.2010. “The Philosophy and Practice of Interpretivist Research in Entrepreneurship.” Organizational Research Methods2010;13 (1): 67–84.
33.
LockeKaren D.2001. Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.
34.
MaransRobert W.StimsonRobert J., eds. 2011. Investigating Quality of Urban Life: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
35.
MartinVivian B.2006. “The Relationship between an Emerging Grounding Theory and the Existing Literature: Four Phases for Consideration.” Grounded Theory Review5 (2/3): 47–50.
36.
McAdamRodneyLeonardDenisHendersonJoanHazlettShirley-Ann. 2008. “A Grounded Theory Research Approach to Building and Testing TQM Theory in Operations Management.” Omega36 (5): 825–37.
37.
McCallinAntionette M.2006. “Grappling with the Literature in a Grounded Theory Study.” Grounded Theory Review5 (2/3): 11–27.
38.
McCannTerenceClarkEileen. 2004. “Grounded Theory in Nursing Research: Part 1—Methodology.” Nurse Researcher11 (2): 7–18.
39.
MillsJaneBonnerAnnFrancisKaren. 2006. “The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods5 (1): 1–10.
40.
MorphetJanice. 2011. Effective Practice in Spatial Planning. New York: Routledge.
41.
MouatClaireDodsonJago. 2013. “Reviewing the Auckland ‘Super City’: Towards an Ongoing Agenda for Evaluating Super City Governance.” Australian Planner50: 138–47.
42.
O’ReillyKelleyPaperDavidMarxSherry. 2012. “Demystifying Grounded Theory for Business Research.” Organizational Research Methods15 (2): 247–62.
43.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2001. Towards a New Role for Spatial Planning. Paris: OECD.
44.
Royal Town Planning Institute. 2007. Shaping and Delivering Tomorrow’s Places: Effective Spatial Planning in Practice. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.
45.
RubinHerbert J.RubinIrene. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
SchwarzMirelaNandhakumarJoe. 2002. “Conceptualizing the Development of Strategic Ideas: A Grounded Theory Analysis.” British Journal of Management13 (1): 67–82.
47.
SousaCelio A. A.Hendriks.Paul H. J.2006. “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly: The Need for Grounded Theory in Developing a Knowledge-Based View of Organizations.” Organizational Research Methods9 (3): 315–39.
48.
SteadDominicMeijersEvert. 2009. “Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors.” Planning Theory and Practice10 (3): 317–32.
49.
StraussAnselm L.Corbin.Juliet M.1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
SuddabyRoy. 2006. “From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not.” Academy of Management Journal49 (4): 633–42.
51.
WhiteleyAlma M.2004. “Grounded Research: A Modified Grounded Theory for the Business Setting.” Qualitative Research Journal4 (1): 27–46.
52.
WongCeciliaWatkinsCraig. 2009. “Conceptualising Spatial Planning Outcomes: Towards an Integrative Measurement Framework.” Town Planning Review80 (4/5): 481–516.
