This study examines how built environment factors at trip destinations influence nonmotorized travel behavior in the City of Long Beach, California. Using 2008–2009 National Household Travel Survey with California Add-Ons, we found that nonmotorized users tend to choose more clustered destinations than motorized users, and that density, diversity, and design at destinations significantly affect mode choice decisions. Transportation networks and nonmotorized facilities at trip destinations are especially important factors for nonmotorized mode choice. Future policy and research need to consider built environment factors at trip destinations to effectively accommodate nonmotorized travel within a city.
Alta Transportation Consulting. 2001. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. City of Long Beach, CA: Alta Transportation Consulting.
2.
AxhausenK. W.GärlingT.1992. “Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis: Conceptual Frameworks, Models, and Research Problems.” Transport Reviews12 (4): 323–41.
3.
BadoeD. A.MillerE. J.2000. “Transportation–Land-Use Interaction: Empirical Findings in North America, and Their Implications for Modeling.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment5 (4): 235–63.
4.
BartholomewK.EwingR.2008. “Land Use–Transportation Scenarios and Future Vehicle Travel and Land Consumption: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (1): 13–27.
5.
Ben-AkivaM. E.BierlaireM.1999. “Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions.” In Handbook of Transportation Science, edited by HallRandolph W., 5–34. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
6.
BentoA. M.CropperM. L.MobarakA. M.VinhaK.2005. “The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics87 (3): 466–78.
7.
Ben-ZadokE.2005. “Consistency, Concurrency and Compact Development: Three Faces of Growth Management Implementation in Florida.” Urban Studies42 (12): 2167–90.
8.
BhatC.GuoJ.2007. “A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological41 (5): 506–26.
9.
BoarnetM. G.CraneR.2001. “The Influence of Land Use on Travel Behavior.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice35 (9): 823–45.
10.
BoarnetM. G.DayK.AndersonC.McmillanT. E.AlfonzoM.2005. “California’s Safe Routes to School Program: Impacts on Walking, Bicycling, and Pedestrian Safety.” Journal of the American Planning Association71 (3): 301–17.
11.
BoarnetM. G.GreenwaldM.McmillanT. E.2008. “Walking, Urban Design, and Health: Toward a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework.” Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (3): 341–58.
12.
BoarnetM. G.GreenwaldM. J.2000. “Land Use, Urban Design, and Nonwork Travel.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1722:27–37.
13.
BoarnetM. G.SarmientoS.1998. “Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics.” Urban Studies35 (7): 1155–69.
14.
BowmanJ. L.Ben-AkivaM. E.2000. “Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice35:1–28.
15.
BoyceD.2002. “Is the Sequential Travel Forecasting Paradigm Counterproductive?” Journal of Urban Planning and Development128 (4): 169–83.
16.
BrownsonR. C.HoehnerC. M.DayK.ForsythA.SallisJ. F.2009. “Measuring the Built Environment for Physical Activity: State of the Science.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine36 (4 Suppl): S99–123.
17.
BrownstoneD.GolobT.2009. “The Impact of Residential Density on Vehicle Usage and Energy Consumption.” Journal of Urban Economics65:91–98.
18.
BusselJ. B.LevitonL. C.OrleansC. T.2009. “Active Living by Design: Perspectives from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine37 (6Suppl 2): S309–12.
19.
CalthorpeP.1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
20.
CaoX.MokhtarianP. L.HandyS. L.2007. “Do Changes in Neighborhood Characteristics Lead to Changes in Travel Behavior? A Structural Equations Modeling Approach.” Transportation34 (5): 535–56.
21.
CaoX.MokhtarianP. L.HandyS. L.2009. “Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings.” Transport Reviews29 (3): 359–95.
22.
CerveroR.2006. “Alternative Approaches to Modeling the Travel-Demand Impacts of Smart Growth.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (3): 285–95.
23.
CerveroR.DuncanM.2003. “Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.” American Journal of Public Health93 (9): 1478–83.
24.
CerveroR.KockelmanK.1997. “Traffic Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment2 (3): 199–219.
25.
CerveroR.RadischC.1996. “Travel Choices in Pedestrian versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods.” Transport Policy3 (3): 127–41.
26.
CerveroR.SarmientoO. L.JacobyE.GomezL. F.NeimanA.2009. “Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation3 (4): 203–26.
27.
ChatmanD. G.2009. “Residential Choice, the Built Environment, and Nonwork Travel: Evidence Using New Data and Methods.” Environment and Planning A41 (5): 1072–89.
28.
CraneR.CrepeauR.1998. “Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel?: A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment3 (4): 225–38.
29.
de NazelleA. J.MarkNieuwenhuijsenJ.AntóJ. M.BrauerM.BriggsD.Braun-FahrlanderC.CavillN.CooperhA. R.DesqueyrouxiH.FruinjS.HoekkG.PanislL. I.JanssenmN.JerrettnM.JoffeeM.AndersenoZ. J.van KempenmE.KinghampS.KubeschaN.LeydenqK. M.MarshallsJ. D.MatamalaaJ.MelliostG.MendezaM.NassifuH.OgilvievD.PeirówR.PérezyK.RablzA.RagettlifM.RodríguezaaD.RojasaD.RuizabP.SallisacJ. F.TerwoertadJ.ToussaintuJ.TuomistoaeJ.ZuurbierkM.LebretkE.2011. “Improving Health through Policies That Promote Active Travel: A Review of Evidence to Support Integrated Health Impact Assessment.” Environment International37 (4): 766–77.
30.
DobsonN. G.GilroyA. R.2009. “From Partnership to Policy: The Evolution of Active Living by Design in Portland, Oregon.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine37 (6Suppl 2): S436–44.
31.
DockF. C.GreenbergE.YamaroneM.2012. “Multimodal and Complete Streets Performance Measures in Pasadena, California.” ITE Journal82 (1): 33–37.
DuanyA.Plater-ZyberkE.SpeckJ.2001. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
34.
EwingR.CerveroR.2001. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis.” Transportation Research Record1780P:87–114.
35.
EwingR.CerveroR.2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 265–94.
36.
EwingR.HandyS.2009. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Urban Design14 (1): 65–84.
37.
EwingR.TianG.GoatesJ.ZhangM.GreenwaldM. J.JoyceA.KircherJ.GreeneW.2015. “Varying Influences of the Built Environment on Household Travel in 15 Diverse Regions of the United States.” Urban Studies52 (13): 2330–48.
38.
ForsythA.KrizekK.2011. “Urban Design: Is There a Distinctive View from the Bicycle?” Journal of Urban Design16 (4): 531–49.
39.
FrankL. D.BradleyM.KavageS.ChapmanJ.LawtonT. K.2008. “Urban Form, Travel Time, and Cost Relationships with Tour Complexity and Mode Choice.” Transportation35 (1): 37–54.
40.
FrankL. D.PivoG.1994. “Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking.” Transportation Research Record1446: 44–52.
41.
FrankL. D.SaelensB. E.PowellK. E.ChapmanJ. E. 2007. “Stepping towards Causation: Do Built Environments or Neighborhood and Travel Preferences Explain Physical Activity, Driving, and Obesity?” Social Science & Medicine65 (9): 1898–1914.
42.
Giles-CortiB.DonovanR. J.2002. “The Relative Influence of Individual, Social and Physical Environment Determinants of Physical Activity.” Social Science & Medicine54 (12): 1793–1812.
GreenwaldM. J.BoarnetM. G.2001. “Built Environment as Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Nonwork Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1780: 33–42.
45.
GuoJ.BhatC.CoppermanR.2007. “Effect of the Built Environment on Motorized and Nonmotorized Trip Making: Substitutive, Complementary, or Synergistic?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2010 (1): 1–11.
46.
HandyS. L.1993. “Regional versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Travel.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1400 (234): 58–66.
47.
HandyS. L.2002. “Travel Behaviour—Land Use Interactions: An Overview and Assessment of the Research.” In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, edited by MahmassaniH. S.Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
48.
HandyS. L.BoarnetM. G.EwingR.KillingsworthR. E.2002. “How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity: Views from Urban Planning.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine23 (2 Suppl): 64–73.
49.
HandyS. L.CaoX.MokhtarianP. L.2006. “Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California.” Journal of the American Planning Association72 (1): 55–74.
50.
IaconoM.KrizekK.El-GeneidyA.M.2008. Access to Destinations: How Close Is Close Enough? Estimating Accurate Distance Decay Functions for Multiple Modes and Different Purposes. St. Paul, MN: Minessota Department of Transportation.
51.
IaconoM.KrizekK.El-GeneidyA.M.2010. “Measuring Non-motorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution.” Journal of Transport Geography18 (1): 133–40.
52.
JohK.NguyenM. T.BoarnetM. G.2011. “Can Built and Social Environmental Factors Encourage Walking among Individuals with Negative Walking Attitudes?” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (2): 219–36.
53.
KitamuraR.MokhtarianP. L.LaidetL.1997. “A Micro-analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation24: 125–58.
54.
KnaapG.TalenE.2005. “New Urbanism and Smart Growth: A Few Words from the Academy.” International Regional Science Review28 (2): 107–18.
55.
KrizekK. J.2006. “Proximity to Trails and Retail: Effects on Urban Cycling and Walking.” Journal of American Planning Association72 (1): 33–42.
56.
KuzmyakJ. R.WaltersJ.HuH.EspieJ.KimD.2012. Travel Behavior and Built Environment: Exploring the Importance of Urban Design at the Non-residential End of the Trip. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
57.
LeesE.SalvesenD.ShayE.2008. “Collaborative School Planning and Active Schools: A Case Study of Lee County, Florida.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law33 (3): 595–615.
58.
LevineJ.FrankL. D.2007. “Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region.” Transportation34: 255–74.
59.
LiaoT. F. 1994. Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit and Other. Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
LiuF.EvansJ. E.RossiT.2012. “Recent Practices in Regional Modeling of Nonmotorized Travel.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2303: 1–8.
61.
McCreedyM.LeslieJ. G.2009. “Get Active Orlando: Changing the Built Environment to Increase Physical Activity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine37 (6Suppl 2): S395-402.
62.
McKenzieB.RapinoM.2011. Commuting in the United States: 2009. American Community Survey Reports. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau.
63.
MitchellA.2005. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spatial Measurements and Statistics. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI).
64.
MokhtarianP. L.2005. “Travel as a Desired End, Not Just a Means.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice39 (2–3): 93–96.
65.
MokhtarianP. L.2008. “Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: A Focus on Methodologies.” Transportation Research42 (3): 204–28.
66.
MoudonA. V.HessP.SnyderM.StanilovK.1997. “Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed Use, Medium-Density Environments.” Transportation Research Record1578: 48-55.
67.
National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Driving and the Built Environment: The Effects of Compact Development on Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2 Emissions—Special Report 298. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
68.
NewmanJ. P.BernardinV. L.2010. “Hierarchical Ordering of Nests in a Joint Mode and Destination Choice Model.” Transportation37 (4): 677–88.
PinjariA. R.PendyalaR. M.BhatC. R.WaddellP. A.2007. “Modeling Residential Sorting Effects to Understand the Impact of the Built Environment on Commute Mode Choice.” Transportation34 (5): 557–73.
71.
PinjariA. R.PendyalaR. M.BhatC. R.WaddellP. A.2011. “Modeling the Choice Continuum: An Integrated Model of Residential Location, Auto Ownership, Bicycle Ownership, and Commute Tour Mode Choice Decisions.” Transportation38 (6): 933–58.
72.
PlautP.2005. “Non-motorized Commuting in the US.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment10 (5): 347–56.
73.
PucherJ.BuehlerR.2010. “Walking and Cycling for Healthy Cities.” Built Environment36 (4): 391–414.
74.
Rodrı́guezD. A.JooJ.2004. “The Relationship between Non-motorized Mode Choice and the Local Physical Environment.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment9 (2): 151–73.
75.
SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F.FrankL. D.2003. “Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings from the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine25 (2): 80–91.
76.
SallisJ. F.2009. “Measuring Physical Activity Environments: A Brief History.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine36 (4 Suppl): S86–92.
77.
SallisJ. F.CerveroR.AscherW.KockelmanK.HendersonA.KraftM. K.KerrJ.2006. “An Ecological Approach to Creating Active Living Communities.” Annual Review of Public Health27 (1): 297–322.
78.
ShafizadehK.NiemeierD.1997. “Bicycle Journey-to-Work: Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1578:84–90.
79.
ShinY. E.VuchicR. V.BruunE. C.2009. “Land Consumption Impacts of a Transportation System on a City.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2110:69–77.
80.
SiegelJ. D.CeaJ.FernándezJ. E.RodriguezR. E.BoyceD.2006. “Comparisons of Urban Travel Forecasts Prepared with the Sequential Procedure and a Combined Model.” Networks and Spatial Economics6 (2): 135–48.
81.
SimmonsE.KayM.InglesA.KhuranaM.SulmontM.LyonsW.2015. Evaluating the Economic Benefits of Nonmotorized Transportation. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
82.
SmallK. A.VerhoefE. T.2007. “Travel Demand.” In The Economics of Urban Transportation, 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
83.
StewartO.2010. “Findings from Research on Active Transportation to School and Implications for Safe Routes to School Programs.” Journal of Planning Literature26 (2): 127–50.
84.
TimmsP.TightM.2010. “Aesthetic Aspects of Walking and Cycling.” Built Environment36 (4): 487–503.
85.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2012. Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
86.
Van AckerV.van WeeB.WitloxF.2010. “When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour.” Transport Reviews30 (2): 219–40.
87.
WoodcockJ.BanisterD.EdwardsP.PrenticeA. M.RobertsI.2007. “Energy and Transport.” Lancet370 (9592): 1078–88.
88.
ZhangM.2004. “The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong.” Journal of the American Planning Association70 (3): 344–60.
