Where a Subdivision Is Not a “Subdivision”: State Enabling Statutes and the Local Regulation (or Not) of Land Division in the United States

Abstract

Subdivision control has long been a central pillar of planning. Nonetheless, many American states statutorily exempt entire classes of land division from local subdivision control. This legal analysis therefore asks the following: Which land divisions are localities actually enabled by statute to regulate as “subdivisions”? Which are exempted from subdivision control? What are the implications for development and planning, particularly at the exurban fringe? This fifty-state review reveals diverse ways subdivisions are defined and particular divisions—involving no new streets, large parcels, or small numbers of lots—commonly exempted from regulation, and possible consequences for managing rural sprawl.

Keywords

subdivision subdivision control subdivision exemption enabling statutes parcelization rural sprawl

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

2004. “Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl?” Urban Affairs Review 39 (3): 376–97.

Arendt

R. G.

1996. Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Prac-tical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Arendt

R. G.

2010. Envisioning Better Communities: Seeing More Options, Making Wiser Choices. Chicago: American Planning Association.

Bengston

Fletcher

Nelson

2004. “Public Policies for Managing Urban Growth and Protecting Open Space: Policy Instruments and Lessons Learned in the United States.” Landscape and Urban Planning 29 (2-3): 271–86.

Bento

Franco

Kaffine

2006. “The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of Alternative Anti-sprawl Policies.” Journal of Urban Economics 59:121–41.

Bier

2001. “Urban Sprawl and Decline: Prospects for Change.” Public Works Management and Policy 6 (2): 83–87.

Brown

Johnson

Loveland

T. R.

Theobald

D. M.

2005. “Rural Land-Use Trends in the Coterminous United States, 1950-2000.” Ecological Applications 15:1851–63.

Byun

Esparza

2005. “A Revisionist Model of Suburbanization and Sprawl: The Role of Political Fragmentation, Growth Control, and Spillovers.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 24:252–64.

Callies

Freilich

Roberts

2008. Cases and Materials on Land Use, 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.

10.

Carrion-Flores

Irwin

2004. “Determinants of Residential Land-Use Conversion and Sprawl and the Rural-Urban Fringe.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4): 889–904.

11.

Carruthers

2003. “Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from Interregional Analysis.” Growth and Change 33:312–40.

12.

Crankshaw

N. M.

2009. “Plowing or Moving? Rural Sprawl in Nelson County, Kentucky.” Landscape Journal 28:2–9.

13.

Ewing

Pendall

Chen

2002. Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact, Vol. I. Washington, DC: Smart Growth America.

14.

Gillham

Oliver

. 2002. The Limitless City: A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate. Washington, DC: Island Press.

15.

Gobster

P. H.

Haight

R. G.

Shriner

2000. “Landscape Change in the Midwest: An Integrated Research and Development Program.” Journal of Forestry 98 (3): 9–14.

16.

Gobster

P. H.

Rickenbach

2004. “Private Forestland Parcelization and Development in Wisconsin’s Northwoods: Perceptions of Resource-Oriented Stakeholders.” Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2-3): 165–82.

17.

Gobster

P. H.

Schmidt

T. L.

2000. “Use of Amenity Indicators in Anticipating Private Forestland Parcelization: A Look at the Lake States’ Northwoods.” In Proceedings of Forest Fragmentation 2000: Sustaining Private Forests in the 21st Century, edited by DeCoster

L. A.

170–80. Alexandria, VA: Sampson Group.

18.

Gonzalez-Abraham

Radeloff

Hammer

Hawbaker

Stewart

Clayton

2007. “Building Patterns and Landscape Fragmentation in Northern Wisconsin, USA.” Landscape Ecology 22:217–30.

19.

Haines

A. L.

Kennedy

McFarlane

2011. “Parcelization: Forest Change Agent in Northern Wisconsin.” Journal of Forestry 109 (2): 101–8.

20.

Haines

A. L.

McFarlane

2012. “Factors Influencing Parcelization in Amenity-Rich Rural Areas.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 32 (1): 81–90.

21.

Heimlich

R. E.

Anderson

W. D.

2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Dept of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. AER-803.

22.

Irwin

Bockstael

2007. “The Evolution of Urban Sprawl: Evidence of Spatial Heterogeneity and Increasing Land Fragmentation.”

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

104 (52): 20672–77.

23.

Wei

Twibell

R. W.

Underhill

2006. “Characterizing Urban Sprawl Using Multi-Stage Remote Sensing Images and Landscape Metrics.” Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 30:861–79.

24.

Katz

2000. “The Federal Role in Curbing Sprawl.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 572:66–77.

25.

Kline

2000. “Comparing States with and without Growth Management Analysis Based on Indicators Based on Indicators with Policy Implications Comment.” Land Use Policy 17:349–55.

26.

Lopez

Hynes

H. P.

2003. “Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, Distribution, and Trends.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (3): 325–55.

27.

McKean

ed. New Oxford American Dictionary. 2005. New York: Oxford University Press.

28.

McKeon

1991. “State Regulation of Subdivisions: Defining the Boundary between State and Local Land Use: Defining the Boundary between State and Local Land Use Jurisdiction in Vermont, Maine, and Florida.” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 19 (2): 385.

29.

Meck

Perlman

2007. Ohio Planning and Zoning Law. Cleveland, OH: Thompson/West.

30.

Mills

2006. “Sprawl and Jurisdictional Fragmentation.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 231–56.

31.

National League of Cities. 2015. “Local Government Authority.” www.nlc.org (accessed July 8, 2015).

32.

Nelson

1992. “Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (4): 467–89.

33.

Nelson

1999. “Comparing States with and without Growth Management: Analysis Based on Indicators with Policy Implications.” Land Use Policy 16:121–27.

34.

Ohio Land Use Review Committee. 1977. Guide: A Guide for Land Use Legislation: Report of the Ohio Land Use Review Committee to the Ohio General Assembly. Columbus, OH: Ohio Land Use Review Committee.

35.

Razin

Rosentraub

2000. “Are Fragmentation and Sprawl Interlinked? North American Evidence.” Urban Affairs Review 35 (6): 821–36.

36.

Radeloff

Hammer

Stewart

2005. “Rural and Suburban Sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and Its Relation to Forest Fragmentation.” Conservation Biology 19 (3): 793–805.

37.

Smith

M. B.

Sharp

2005. “Growth, Development and Farming in an Ohio Exurban Region.” Environment and Behavior 37:565–79.

38.

Theobald

2002. “Land-Use Dynamics beyond the American Urban Fringe.” The Geographical Review 91 (3): 544–64.

39.

US Department of Commerce. 1928. A Standard City Planning Enabling Act. Washington, DC: Advisory Committee on City Planning and Zoning.

40.

Wheeler

2008. “The Evolution of Built Landscapes in Metropolitan Regions.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 27:400–17.

41.

Yin

Sun

2007. “The Impacts of State Growth Management Programs on Urban Sprawl in the 1990s.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (2): 149–79.