Through an analysis of a street transformation initiative in Saint Paul, Minnesota, this article argues that public engagement can be effective when it occurs early in a planning process and takes into account the aesthetics—atmosphere, embodiment, formality, and emotions—of events. Residents can catalyze engagement prior to municipal involvement, thereby creating a temporal opening that presents opportunities for creative visioning and deliberation. The limits of the approach emerge when city public engagement processes commence and aesthetics become more formal. Especially challenging is a shift in affective performance and maintaining the inclusion of representative publics.
ApostolI.AntoniadisP.BanerjeeT.2012. “Flânerie between Net and Place: Promises and Possibilities for Participation in Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (1): 20–33.
2.
ArnsteinS. R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association35 (4): 216–24.
3.
BriggsX. S.1998. “Doing Democracy Up Close: culture, power, and communication in community building.” Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (1): 1–13.
4.
CampbellH.MarshallR.2000. “Public Involvement and Planning: Looking beyond the One to the Many.” International Planning Studies5 (3): 321–44.
5.
CarterM., Saint Paul City Councilmember. Spring2010. Comments at the 2010 Saint Paul Smart Trips Transportation Summit. Saint Paul, Minnesota.
6.
Central Corridor Friendly Streets. December22, 2011. Report on Phase 1. Saint Paul, Minnesota.
7.
Central Corridor Friendly Streets. June21, 2012. Data and Analysis of Three Recent CCFS Public Engagement Events. Saint Paul, Minnesota.
DeweyJ.1927. The Public & Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
12.
DeweyJ.1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
13.
DuneierM.2000. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
14.
EisenhardtE. M.1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review14 (4): 532–50.
15.
EngwichtD.1999. Street Reclaiming: Creating Livable Streets and Vibrant Communities. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
16.
ForesterJ.2012. “Learning to Improve Practice: Lessons from Practice Stories and Practitioners’ Own Discourse Analyses (or Why Only the Loons Show Up).” Planning Theory & Practice13 (1): 11–26.
17.
GehlJ.2010. Cities for People. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18.
Hart-BrinsonP.2012. “Civic Production and Civic Recreation.” Sociological Theory30 (2): 130–47.
19.
HealeyP.1996. “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation.” Environment and Planning B23:217–34.
20.
HealeyP.2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory2 (2): 101–23.
21.
HenshawVictoria. 2014. Urban Smellscapes: Understanding and Designing City Smell Environments. London: Routledge.
22.
HochC.2006. “Emotions and Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice7 (4): 367–82.
23.
HouJ.2011. “Citizen Design: Participation and Beyond.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by BanerjeeT.Loukaitou-SiderisA.329–40. London: Routledge.
24.
HouJ.KinoshitaI.2007. “Bridging Community Differences through Informal Processes: Reexamining Participatory Planning in Seattle and Matsudo.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (3): 301–14.
25.
HouJ.RiosM.2003. “Community-Driven Place Making: The Social Practice of Participatory Design in the Making of Union Point Park.” Journal of Architecture Education57 (1): 19–27.
26.
InnesJ. E.1996. “Planning through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal.” Journal of the American Planning Association62 (4): 460–72.
27.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E.1999. “Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association65 (4): 412–23.
28.
IvesonK.2007. Publics and the City. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
JacobsJ.1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
30.
JohnsonM.2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
JonesP.2005. “Performing the City: A Body and a Bicycle Take on Birmingham, UK.” Social & Cultural Geography6 (6): 813–30.
32.
KadlecA.2010. “Play and Public Life.” National Civic ReviewWinter: 3–11.
33.
KidderJ. L.2012. “Parkour, the Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic.” City & Community11 (3): 229–53.
34.
LaurianL.ShawM. M.2009. “Evaluation of Public Participation: The Practices of Certified Planners.” Journal of Planning Education and Research28:293–309.
35.
LathamA.McCormackD. P.2010. “Globalizations Big and Small: Notes on Urban Studies, Actor-Network Theory, and Geographic Scale.” In Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, edited by FariasI.BenderT.53–72. London: Routledge.
36.
LatourBruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
LaveJ.WengerE.1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LohC. G.2012. “Four Potential Disconnects in the Community Planning Process.” Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (1): 33–47.
39.
MansbridgeJ.1999. “On the Idea that Participation Makes Better Citizens.” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, edited by ElkinS. L.SoltanK. E., 291–326. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
40.
MiddletonJ.2010. “Sense and the City: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking.” Social & Cultural Geography11 (6): 575–596.
QuickK. S.FeldmanM. S.2011. “Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (3): 272–90.
44.
QuickK. S.ZhaoZ. J.2011. Enhancing Public Engagement in Transportation Policy-Making: Review of Techniques, Suggested Framework for Policy-Makers, and Case Study. Final Report. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
45.
RoheW. M.2009. “From Local to Global: 100 Years of Neighborhood Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (2): 209–30.
Saint Paul District Councils. 2013. 2012 Annual Report.
48.
SandercockL.1997. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: Wiley.
49.
SennettR.1996. Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization. New York, NY: Norton.
50.
SilvermanR. M.2003. “Citizen’s District Councils in Detroit: The Promise and Limits of Using Planning Advisory Boards to Promote Citizen Participation.” National Civic Review92:3–13.
51.
TaitM.2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (2): 157–71.
52.
TaitM.2012. “Building Trust in Planning Professionals: Understanding the Contested Legitimacy of a Planning Decision.” Town and Regional Planning83 (5): 597–617.
53.
TarrowS.1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
YoungI. M.1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
