The research addresses practitioners’ perspective on the theoretical debate over process versus outcome. Analysis of 119 structured interviews of exemplary planners on their roles, goals, constraints, and strategies finds support for both sides. Planners are process-oriented facilitators who use communication and networking strategies. Ninety-five percent are outcome oriented, either toward their own goals, such as equity, or their agencies’, such as affordable housing. They plan in institutionally constrained practice settings of unequal power. They tailor strategies to constraints of politics, bureaucracy, or limited resources. Thus, planners reconcile the debate, using processes to achieve valued outcomes.
AlinskyS.1972. Rules for Radicals. New York: Vintage.
2.
BaumH.1983. Planners and Public Expectations. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
3.
BrysonJ.CrosbyB.1992. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems When No One Is in Charge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
ChristensenK.1999. Cities and Complexity: Making Intergovernmental Decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
ChristensenK.2000. Affordable Housing: Constraints and Opportunities for Nonprofit Developers. CPRC Brief, California Policy Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
6.
DavidoffP.1965. “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners31 (4): 331–38.
7.
De RooG.2000. “Compact Cities, Environmental Conflicts and Policy Strategies: Complexity as a Criterion for Decision Making.” In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, edited by WillliamsK.BurtonE.JenksM.New York: Routledge.
8.
FainsteinSusan S.2010. The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
FischlerR.2000. “Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Perspective.” Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (4): 358–68.
10.
FisherR.UryW.1981. Getting to Yes. London: Penguin.
11.
FlyvbjergB.1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
ForesterJ.1987. “Planning in the Face of Conflict.” Journal of the American Planning Association53 (3): 301–14.
13.
ForesterJ.1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
GiddensA.1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
15.
GrantJ.2002. “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle.” Journal of the American Planning Association68 (1): 71–84.
16.
GualiniE.2001. Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions: Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-Making between Institutional Design and Institution-Building. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.
17.
HajerM.WagenaarH., eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HealeyP.1999. “Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning and Shaping Places.” Journal of Planning Education and Research19:111–21.
19.
HealeyP.2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory2:101–23.
20.
HealeyP.2010. Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke, Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
HealeyP.2012. “The Universal and the Contingent: Some Reflections on the Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices.” Planning Theory11 (2): 188–207.
22.
HochC.2007. “Pragmatic Communicative Action Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (3): 272–83.
23.
HochC.2009. “Planning Craft: How Do Planners Compose Plans?”Planning Theory9 (2): 219–41.
24.
HoweE.1994. Acting on Ethics in City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
25.
HuxleyM.2000. “The Limits to Communicative Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (4): 369–78.
26.
HuxleyM.YiftachelO.2000. “New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (4): 333–42.
27.
InnesJ.1995. “Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research14:3.
28.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
29.
InnesJ.GruberJ.NeumanM.ThompsonR.1994. Coordinating Growth and Environmental Management through Consensus Building. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, California Policy Seminar.
30.
KrumholzN.ForesterJ.1990. Making Equity Planning Work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
31.
McGovernS. J.2013. “Ambivalence over Participatory Planning within a Progressive Regime: Waterfront Planning in Philadelphia.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (3): 310–24.
32.
Puppim de OliveiraJ. A.2005. “Enforcing Protected Area Guidelines in Brazil: What Explains Participation in the Implementation Process.” Journal of Planning Education and Research24:420–36.
33.
SchonD.ReinM.1993. “Reframing Problems.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by FisherF.ForesterJ.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
SeasonsM.2003. “Monitoring and Evaluation in Municipal Planning: Considering the Realities.” Journal of the American Planning Association69 (4): 430–40.
35.
SenbelM.StevensM.FergusonD.2012. “Local Responses to Regional Mandates: Assessing Municipal GHG Emission Reduction Targets in British Columbia.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy9 (1): 28–41.
36.
Webster-Merriam. 1956. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam.
