As the planning academy has grown and evolved, it has developed different ways of doing planning research. People may (a) work at the scientific frontier, (b) investigate issues of practical relevance, (c) reflect on the implications of practice, or (d) try to answer the enduring questions of planning. These are important differences. Different cultures represent varying ideas about what constitutes an important or significant contribution to the field of planning.
AlexanderE. R.2001. What do planners need to know?Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (3): 376-80.
2.
BarnesT.2004. Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography28 (5): 565-95.
3.
BeardV.BasoloV.2009. Moving beyond crisis, crossroads, and the abyss in the disciplinary formation of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 233-42.
4.
BeauregardR.2001. The multiplicities of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research20: 437-39.
5.
BecherT.TrowlerP. R.2001. Academic tribes and territories. 2nd ed.Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
6.
BirchE.2001. Practitioners and the art of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (4): 407-22.
7.
BoyerE.1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8.
CheckowayB.1998. Professionally related public service as applied scholarship. Journal of Planning Education and Research17 (4): 358-60.
9.
DiamondR.2002. Defining scholarship for the twenty-first century. In Scholarship in the postmodern era, edited by ZahorskiKenneth. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10.
DoanP.HigginsH.2011. The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research31: 6-25.
11.
DonnisonD.1980. The good city: A study of urban development policy in Britain. London: Heinemann.
12.
DuToitJ. L.2010. A typology of designs for social research in the built environment. Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Social Science Methods) at the University of Stellenbosch.
13.
EdwardsM.BatesL.2011. Planning’s core curriculum: knowledge, practice, and implementation. Journal of Planning Education and Research31: 172-83.
14.
ForsythA.CreweK.2006. Research in environmental design: Definitions and limits. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research23 (2): 160-75.
15.
FrankN.2002. Rethinking planning theory for a master’s-level curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research21: 323-30.
16.
GoldsteinH.CarminJ.2006. Compact, diffuse, or would-be discipline? Assessing cohesion in planning scholarship, 1963-2002. Journal of Planning Education and Research26: 66-79.
17.
GoldsteinH.MaierG.2010. The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research30 (1): 66-75.
18.
GrengsJ.LevineJ.ShenQ.ShenQ. Y.2010. Intermetropolitan comparison of transportation accessibility: Sorting out mobility and proximity in San Francisco and Washington, D.C. Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (4): 427-43.
19.
GroatL.WangD.2002. Architectural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
20.
GuhathakurtaS.GoberP.2010. Residential land use, the urban heat island, and water use in Phoenix: a path analysis. Journal of Planning Education and Research30: 40-51.
21.
HackG.1984. Research for urban design. In Architectural research, edited by SnyderJames. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
22.
HirschmanA. O.1970. The search for paradigms as a hindrance to understanding. World Politics22 (3): 329-43.
23.
HopkinsL. (2001). Planning as science. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (4): 399-406.
24.
JacobsA.2011. The good city: Reflections and imaginations. New York: Routledge.
25.
KrumholzN.ForesterJ.1990. Making equity planning work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
KuhnT.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
LatourB.1981. Insiders and outsiders in the sociology of science; or, how can we foster agnosticism. Knowledge and Society3: 199-216.
28.
LynchK.1984. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
MegillA.1987. Provocation on belief: Part 4. Social Epistemology1 (1): 106-8.
30.
MilroyB. M.2009. Planning as a discipline or a field of practice?Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 243-44.
31.
MullerB.SchulteS.2011. Governing wildfire risks: What shapes county hazard mitigation programs?Journal of Planning Education and Research31: 60-73.
32.
MyersD.2009. Reconsidering planning practice and social theory in our disciplinary formation. Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 245-46.
33.
MyersD.KitsuseA.2000. Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research19: 221-31.
PunterJ.CampbellH.2009. Reflections on the 2008 United Kingdom Research Assessment Exercise for Town and Country Planning and loosely associated disciplines. Town Planning Review80 (1): 31-55.
36.
RaginC. C.1994. Constructing social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
37.
RajaS.YinL.RoemmichJ.MaC.EpsteinL.YadayP.TicoaluA. B.2010. Food environment, built environment, and women’s BMI: Evidence from Erie County, New York. Journal of Planning Education and Research29: 444-60.
38.
RayerS.SmithS. K.2010. Factors affecting the accuracy of subcounty population forecasts. Journal of Planning Education and Research30: 147-61.
39.
RiceR. E.2002. Beyond scholarship reconsidered: Toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. In Scholarship in the postmodern era, edited by ZahorskiKenneth. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
40.
SaletW.BoerR.2011. Comparing the use and valuation of journals between U.S. and European planning scholars. Journal of Planning Education and Research31 (1): 95-97.
41.
SiemiatyckiM.2012. The role of the planning scholar: Research, conflict, and social change. Journal of Planning Education and Research32 (2): 147-59.
42.
StiftelB.ForsythA.DaltonL.SteinerF.2009. Assessing planning school performance: multiple paths, multiple measures. Journal of Planning Education and Research28: 323-35.
43.
SwalesJ.2004. Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SweetE. L.ChakarsM.2010. Identity, culture, land, and language: stories of insurgent planning in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia. Journal of Planning Education and Research30: 198-209.
45.
ThriftN. J.1999. Steps to an ecology of place. In Human geography today, edited by MasseyD.AllenJ.SarreP.Cambridge: Polity.
46.
ToulminS.1972. Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
WinklerT.2011. Retracking Johannesburg: Spaces for participation and policy making. Journal of Planning Education and Research31: 258-71.
