Congestion pricing is an effective way to combat congestion, and market prices for curb parking are an appealing way to implement pricing, because paying to park is more politically acceptable than paying to drive. But pricing is effective only if users have to pay, and market-priced parking is vulnerable to nonpayment. To illustrate this problem, we survey parking meters in Los Angeles. We focus on legal nonpayment, and show that almost 40 percent of vehicles at meters are both not paying and not breaking any laws. The majority of nonpayment comes from vehicles displaying disabled credentials. These credentials undermine the effectiveness of priced parking and appear to invite substantial fraud.
ArnottR.2005. City tolls—one element of a successful policy cocktail. CESifo DICE Report, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, 3 (3): 5-11.
2.
ArnottR.RowseJ.2009. Downtown parking in an auto city. Regional Science and Urban Economics39(1): 1-14.
3.
BeckerG.1993. Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy101(3): 385-409.
4.
BraultM.2008. Americans With Disabilities: 2005. Current population reports, p70-117. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
5.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2002. Freedom to travel. BTS ReportS03-08.
FismanR.MiquelE.2007. Corruption, norms and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Journal of Political Economy115 (6): 1020-48.
8.
FremstadS.2009. Half in ten: Why taking disability into account is essential to reducing income poverty and expanding economic inclusion. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
HarsmanB.QuigleyJ.2010. Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management29 (4): 854-74.
12.
HoustonD.WuJ.OngP.WinerA.2004. Structural disparities of urban traffic in Southern California. Journal of Urban Affairs26 (5): 565-92.
13.
KingDavidManvilleMichaelShoupDonald. 2007. The political calculus of congestion pricing. Transport Policy14 (2): 111-23.
14.
KrishnanSonia.2010. “Parking Enforcement Officers Work to Curb Abuse of Disability Placards,” Seattle Times, August26.
15.
LevinsonD.OdlyzckoA.2008. Too expensive to meter: The influence of transactions costs in transportation and communication. Philosophical Transactions366 (1872): 2033-46.
16.
LustigD.StrauserD.2007. Causal relationships between poverty and disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin50(4): 194-202.
17.
SantosG.2008. London congestion charging. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp. 177-234.
18.
SchallerB.2010. New York City’s congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States. Transport Policy17 (4): 266-73.
19.
SenA.2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap.
20.
SheP.LivermoreG.2009. Long-term poverty and disability among working-age adults. Journal of Disability Policy Studies19 (4): 244-56.
21.
ShinA.2010. Misuse of handicapped parking placards is widespread.Washington Post, September26.
22.
ShoupD.2005. The high cost of free parking. Chicago, IL: Planner’s Press.
23.
ShoupD.2006. Cruising for parking. Transport Policy13: 479-86.
24.
ShoupD.2010. Putting cities back on their feet. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, September, pp. 225-33.
25.
VerhoefE.NijkampP.RietveldP.1995. The economics of regulatory parking policies. Transportation Research A29 (2): 141-56.
