Planning practitioners encounter both “tame” and “wicked” problems in the workplace. Conventional planning studios generally prepare students for the less complex or tame problems, but politically contentious studios fraught with uncertainty will simulate a more realistic, if not more challenging, studio experience. In this study, I use content analysis of university syllabi to determine the degree to which planning studios are preparing students to tackle “wicked problems” upon graduation. Then, based on the lessons learned from a workshop pertaining to natural gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, I offer guidance to instructors of studio-type courses who wish to introduce their students to complex problem solving.
AbbottJohn. 2005. Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research24: 237-51.
2.
AckoffRussell L.1974. Redesigning the future: Systems approach to societal problems. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
3.
AllmendingerPhilipTewdwr-JonesMark. 2002. The communicative turn in urban planning: Unraveling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity6 (1): 5-24.
4.
BoreAnneWrightNigel. 2009. The wicked and complex in education: Developing a transdisciplinary perspective for policy formulation, implementation and professional practice. Journal of Education for Teaching35 (3): 241-56.
5.
BlackwellAngelaColmenarRaymond. 1999. Transforming policy through local wisdom. Futures31 (5): 487-97.
6.
BrysonJohn. 1988. Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organisations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
ChristensenKaren S.1993. Teaching savvy. Journal of Planning Education and Research12: 202-12.
8.
ChristensenKaren S.1999. Cities and complexity: Making intergovernmental decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ConklinJeff. 2005. Wicked problems and social complexity. In Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons CogNexus Institute. http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems.pdf.
11.
ConklinJeff. 2006. Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. New York: Wiley Interscience.
DeweyJohn. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
14.
EngelderTerryLashGary. 2008. Unconventional natural gas reservoir could boost U.S. supply. Penn State Live.
15.
ForesterJohn. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
ForesterJohn2000. Why bother with planning theory: Educating citizens, recognizing differences, and mediating deliberations. In The profession of city planning: Changes, images, and challenges, 1950-2000, ed. RodwinL.SanyalB.New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
17.
FriendJohnJessopNeil. 1969. Local government and strategic choice: An operational research approach to the processes of public planning. London: Tavistock.
18.
GutmannAmyThompsonDennis. 2004. Why deliberative democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
GuzzettaJacqueline D.BollensScott A.2003. Urban planners’ skills and competencies: Are we different from other professions? Does context matter? Do we evolve?Journal of Planning Education and Research23: 96-106.
20.
HealeyPatsy. 1992. Planning through debate. Town Planning Review63 (2): 143-62.
HealeyPatsy. 1999. Institutional analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research19: 111-21.
23.
HigginbothamNickAlbrechtGlennConnorLinda (eds). 2001. Health social science: A transdisciplinary and complexity perspective. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
24.
HornRobert E.2001. Knowledge mapping for complex social messes. Paper presented at the “Foundations in the Knowledge Economy” conference at the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 16 July 2001.
25.
HuxleyMargoYiftachelOren. 2000. New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research19: 333-42.
26.
InnesJudith E.1995. Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (3): 183-90.
27.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2003. Collaborative policy making: Governance through dialogue. In Deliberative policy analysis: Governance in the network society, ed. HajerM. W.WagenaarH., 33-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
InnesJudith E.BooherDavid E.2010. Planning with complexity. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
29.
KhistyC. Jotin. 2000. Can wicked problems be tackled through abductive reasoning?Journal of Urban Planning and Development126 (3): 104-18.
30.
KotvalZenia. 2003. Teaching experiential learning in the urban planning curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education27 (3): 297-308.
31.
KuehlPhilip G.1992. 1992 job analysis survey: American Institute of Certified Planners. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.
32.
LazarusRichard J.2009. Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review94: 1153-1233.
33.
LevinKellyBernsteinStevenCashoreBenjaminAuldGraeme. 2007. Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the “super wicked” problem of global climate change. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Convention, Chicago, IL, February 28-March 3.
NuttThomas E.SusskindLawrence E.RetsinasNicholas P.1970. Prospects for urban planning education. Journal of the American Planning Association36 (4): 229-41.
39.
OzawaConnie P.SeltzerEthan P.1999. Taking our bearings: Mapping a relationship among planning practice, theory, and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research18: 257-66.
40.
RittelHorst W. J.WebberMelvin M.1973. Dilemmas in the general theory of planning. Policy Science4: 155-69.
41.
RobertsNancy C.2000. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review1 (1): 1-19.
42.
RosenheadJonathan. 1996. What’s the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces26 (6): 117-31.
43.
SchönDonald A.1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
SeltzerEthan P.OzawaConnie P.2002. Clear signals: Moving on to planning’s promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research22: 77-86.
45.
StaceyRalph D.1996. Strategic management and organisational dynamics. London: Pitman.
Urban Insight. 2009. Planetizen guide to graduate urban planning programs: 2009 edition. Los Angeles: Planetizen Press.
48.
WheelerStephen. 1998. Planning sustainable and livable cities. In The City Reader, 4th ed., ed. LeGatesR.StoutF., 500-509. London: Routledge.
49.
YilmazCevdet. 2003. Planning and planner in a post-positivist global world: Towards a new paradigm. Journal of Economic and Social Research5 (2): 21-46.
