Planning needs more diversity if it is to have legitimacy. Diversity can be achieved through more diverse faculty and students who become practitioners, and by increased scholarship that addresses diversity. In this essay, we examine the trends in scholarship about diversity in planning and the barriers to increasing faculty and students of color in planning schools, and we propose ways to move forward. We conclude that planning must increase the number of faculty of color in tenured and tenure-track positions and enhance the ability of planning programs to adequately address issues of race and gender to balance the power relations within the academy.
AndersonJ. A.2007. 8 crucial steps to increase diversity. The Chronicle of Higher Education54 (5): B36.
2.
BollingerLee C.2003. Opinion: A resounding victory for diversity on campus. Washington Post, June24.
3.
BollingerL.2007. Why diversity matters. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June1.
4.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo2006. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the Unites States.New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
ChacónJ. M.2008. Race as a diagnostic tool: Latinas/os and higher education in California, Post-209. California Law Review96: 1215-57.
7.
ChangM. J.DensonN.SaensV.2006. The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interactions among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education77 (3): 430-55.
8.
CloudD.2009. The McCarthyism that Horowitz built: The cases of Margo RamlalNankoe, William Robinson, Nagesh Rao, and Loretta Capeheart. Monthly Review Magazine. http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/cloud290409.html (accessed July 2, 2009).
9.
ConstantineM. G.SmithL.RedingtonR.OwensD.2008. Racial microaggressions against black counseling and counseling psychology faculty: A central challenge in the multicultural counseling movement. Journal of Counseling and Development86 (3): 348-55.
10.
CordovaT.1994. Refusing to appropriate: The emerging discourse on planning and race. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (2): 242-45.
11.
CordovaT.1997. Power in knowledge: Colonialism in the academy. In Living Chicana Theory, ed. TrujilloCarlaBerkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.
12.
EvansA.ChunE. B.2007. Are the walls really down? Behavioral and organizational barriers to faculty and staff diversity. ASHE Higher Education Report31 (1): 1-139.
13.
ForsythA.1995. Diversity issues in a professional curriculum: Four stories and some suggestions for change. Journal of Planning Education and Research15: 58-63.
14.
GallagherA.TrowerC.2009. The demand for diversity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, February4, 2009. Accessed July 2, 2011.
15.
GrigsbyJ. E.III1994. In planning there is no such thing as a “race neutral” policy. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (2): 240-42.
16.
HillE. W.1990. Increasing minority representation in the planning professoriate. Journal of Planning Education and Research9: 139-43.
17.
HooverE.2007. The rankings of rainbow. The Chronicle of Higher Education54 (5): B12.
18.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Enrollment data for city, community and regional planning and architectural urban design and planning, 1984-2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (accessed February 20, 2011).
19.
JayakumarU. M.HowardT. C.AllenW. R.2009. Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education5: 538-63.
LeavittJ.1983. The gender gap: Making planning education relevant. Journal of Planning Education3: 55-56.
22.
LewisG. B.FrankS. A.2002. Who wants to work for the government?Public Administration Review62 (4): 394-404.
23.
LooyeJ. W.SesayA.1998. Introducing diversity into the planning curriculum: A method for department-wide implementation. Journal of Planning Education and Research18: 161-70.
24.
MierR.1994. Some observations on race in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association60 (2): 235-40.
25.
MooneyC.2006. Black mathematicians, still a rarity, see light at the end of the pipeline. The Chronicle of Higher Education53 (6): B12.
26.
MorenoJ. F.SmithD. G.Clayton-PedersenA. R.ParkerS.TeraguchiD. H.2006. The revolving door for underrepresented minorities faculty in higher education: An analysis from the campus diversity initiative. The James Irving Foundation Campus Diversity Initiative Evaluation Project.
27.
NewmanK. S.1992. Culture and structure in the truly disadvantaged. City & Society6 (1): 3-25.
28.
PerryJ. L.1990. The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review50 (3): 367-73.
Planners of Color Interest Groups (POCIG). 2010. Memo: Planners of Color Interest Group (POCIG) recommendations to ACSP Governing Board. February7.
31.
Planning Accreditation Board. 2006. The accreditation document: Criteria and procedures of the planning accreditation program. http://www.planningaccreditationboard.org/ (accessed June 15, 2010).
32.
QadeerM. A.1997. Pluralistic planning for multicultural cities: The Canadian practice. Journal of the American Planning Association63 (4): 481-94.
33.
RitzdorfM.1993. The fairy’s tale: Teaching planning and public policy in a different voice. Journal of Planning Education and Research12: 99-106
34.
RoperD.1980. The waning of the old boy network: Placement, publishing and faculty selection. Improving College and University Teaching28: 12-18.
35.
RossC. L.1990. Increasing minority and female representation in the profession: A call for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research9: 135-40.
36.
SandercockL., ed. 1998. Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
SeelyeK. Q.BosmanJ.2008. Ferraro’s Obama remarks become talk of campaign. (Sen. Barack Obama, former congressional representative Geraldine A. Ferraro). New York Times, March12, p. A23.
38.
SmallM. L.NewmanK.2001. Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged. Annual Review of Sociology27 (1): 23-45.
39.
StanleyC. A.2007. When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher36 (1): 14-24.
40.
SweetE.2006. Spy or feminist: “Grrrilla” research on the margin. Advances in Gender Research, 10: 145-62.
41.
ThomasJ. M.1996. Educating planners: Unified diversity in social action. Journal of Planning Education and Research15: 171-82.
42.
ThronsonD. B.2008. Creating crisis: Immigration raids and the destabilization of immigrant families. Wake Forest Law Review43: 391-418.
43.
WilsonR.2007. Black women seek a role in philosophy. The Chronicle of Higher Education55 (4): B2.
44.
WilsonW. J.1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
45.
WubnehM.2009. Climate survey: Diversity and minority faculty perception of institutional climate of planning schools. A report submitted to the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Governing Board.
