This essay uses critical transnationalism to place planning in the world. It examines two types of transnational practices: the enforcement of the global border in the Americas, and the transnational traffic of “fast” policy that increasingly characterizes the global nature of planning. The essay suggests counterpractices, “technologies of crossing” and forms of “slow learning,” that puncture such forms of dominance and hegemony. It presents critical transnationalism as a way of inhabiting borders and as a way of “seeing from the South.” Critical transnationalism, it argues, presents planning thought and practice with new spatial imaginations and thereby with new ethical frameworks.
AllenJ.CochraneA.2007. Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies41 (9): 1161–75.
2.
AminA.2006. The good city. Urban Studies43 (5/6): 1009–23.
3.
AnzalduaG.1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
4.
AppaduraiA.1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ChinM.DiehlT.GinouxP.MalmW.2007. Intercontinental transport of pollution and dust aerosols: Implications for regional air quality. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics7: 5501–17.
CruzT.2007. Border postcards: Chronicles from the edge. In Dynamic equilibrium: In pursuit of public terrain, ed. YardS., 68-91. San Diego, CA: insite05.org.
8.
CruzT.2008. Border tours: Strategies of surveillance, tactics of encroachment. In Indefensible space: The architecture of the national insecurity state, ed. SorkinM., 111-40. New York: Routledge.
9.
De CerteauM.1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
DearM.LeclercG.2003. Introduction: The postborder condition. Art and urbanism in Bajalta California. In Postborder city: Cultural spaces of Bajalta California, ed. DearM.LeclercG., 1–32. New York: Routledge.
11.
DevlinR.2010. Informal urbanism: Legal ambiguity, uncertainty, and the management of street vending in New York City. Unpublished dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley.
12.
FainsteinS.2009. Planning and the just city. In Searching for the just city, ed. MarcuseP.ConnollyJ.NovyJ.OlivoJ.SteilJ., 19–39. New York: Routledge.
13.
FraserN.2009. Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
FraserN.2010. Who counts? Dilemmas of justice in a postwestphalian world. Antipode41 (1): 281–97.
15.
GrahamS.2008. Cities and the war on terror. In Indefensible space: The architecture of the national insecurity state, ed. SorkinM., 1-28. New York: Routledge.
16.
GrosfoguelR.Maldonado-TorresN.SaldivarJ. D.2006. Latin@s in the world-system: Decolonization struggles in the 21st century U.S. Empire. New York: Paradigm.
17.
GunderM.2005. The production of desirous space: Mere fantasies of the Utopian City?Planning Theory4 (2): 173–99.
18.
HallS.1997. The local and the global: Globalization and ethnicity. In Culture, globalization and the world system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity, ed. KingA., 19–40. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
HaydenD.1997. The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HealeyP.2010. The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Paper prepared for the 24th AESOP conference, Finland, July.
21.
HoffmanL.2011. Urban modeling and contemporary technologies of city-building in China: The production of regimes of green urbanisms. In Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global, ed. RoyA.OngA., 55-76. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
KleinJ.2007. Performance, post-border art, and urban geography. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art86: 31–39.
24.
KoptiuchK.1991. Third-worlding at home. Social Text28: 87–99.
25.
Maldonado-TorresN.2005. Decolonization and the new identitarian logics after September 11: Eurocentrism and Americanism against the new barbarian threats. Radical Philosophy Review8 (1): 35–67.
26.
MallabyS.2004. The world’s banker: A story of failed states, financial crises, and the wealth and poverty of nations. New York: Penguin.
27.
ManiL.2008. The phantom of globality and the delirium of excess. Economic and Political Weekly27 (September): 41–47.
28.
MasseyD.2007. World city. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
29.
McCannE.WardK.2010. Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum41: 175–84.
30.
McFarlaneC.2006. Crossing borders: Development, learning and the North-South Divide. Third World Quarterly27 (8): 1413–37.
31.
MiraftabF.2009. Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the Global South. Planning Theory8 (1): 32–50.
32.
MitchellT.2009. Carbon democracy. Economy and Society38 (3): 399–432.
33.
New York Times. 2010. Trenton gets it right on immigrant IDs. May23.
34.
PeckJ.TheodoreN.2010. Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: Transnationalizing “fast” social policy. Geoforum41: 195–208.
PopkeJ.2007. Geography and ethics: Spaces of cosmopolitan responsibility. Progress in Human Geography31 (4): 509–18.
37.
RaghuramP.MadgeC.NoxoloP.2009. Rethinking responsibility and care for a postcolonial world. Geoforum40: 5–13.
38.
RanciereJ.2010. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Trans. CorcoranS.New York: Continuum.
39.
RankinK.2009. Critical development studies and the praxis of planning. City13 (2): 219–29.
40.
RobinsonJ.2002. Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26 (3): 531–54.
41.
RoyA.2004. Transnational trespassings: The geopolitics of urban informality. In Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia, ed. RoyA.AlSayyadN., 289-317. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
42.
SandovalC.2002. Afterbridge: Technologies of crossing. In This bridge we call home: radical visions for transformation, ed. AnzalduaG.KeatingA., 21-6. New York: Routledge.
43.
SmithR. C.2003. Where am I at home? The interplay of national, local, and imaginative space. In Postborder city: Cultural spaces of Bajalta California, ed. DearM.LeclercG., 217–48. New York: Routledge.
44.
SolnitR.2007. Storming the gates of paradise: landscapes for politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
SparkeM.2006. A neoliberal nexus: Economy, security, and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border. Political Geography25 (2): 151–80.
46.
SrinivasaU. T.CareyS. P.HallsteinE.HigginsP. A. T.KerrA. C.KoteenL. E.SmithA. B.WatsonR.HarteJ.NorgaardR. B.2008. The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (5): 1768–73.
47.
Subcomandante Marcos. 2000. Do not forget ideas are also weapons. Le Monde Diplomatique.
48.
TsingA.2004. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
YehR.2009. “We’re Mexican Too”: Publicity and status at the international line. Public Culture21 (3): 465–93.
50.
WatsonV.2009. Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies46: 2259–75.
51.
Wolf-PowersL.2009. Keeping counterpublics alive in planning. In Searching for the just city, ed. MarcuseP.ConnollyJ.NovyJ.OlivoI.PotterJ.SteilJ., 161–72. New York: Routledge.
