Australian Government.2006. Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. The Recommended RQF. Canberra , Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training .
2.
Australian Government.2008. Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative: Consultation paper . Canberra: Australian Research Council.
3.
Goldstein, H., and G. Maier.2010. The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research30:66-75.
4.
Hussey, T., and P. Smith.2009. The trouble with higher education: A critical examination of our universities. London: Routledge.
5.
Morgan, J.2010. Audit overload. The Times Higher Education Supplement, March 4. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk .
6.
Punter, J., and H. Campbell.2009. Reflections on the 2008 United Kingdom Research Assessment Exercise for Town and Country Planning and Closely Associated Disciplines. Town Planning Review80:31-55.
7.
Rowbotham, J.2010a. Journal rankings praised amid criticism. The Australian, November 17, p. 28.
8.
Rowbotham, J.2010b. Journal rankings rankle academics. The Australian, November 10, p. 39.
9.
Salmi, J., and A. Saroyan.2007. League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy19:31-68.
10.
Stiftel, B., A. Forsyth, L. Dalton, and F. Steiner.2009. Assessing planning school performance multiple paths, multiple measures. Journal of Planning Education and Research28: 323-35.
11.
Stiftel, B., and C. Mukhopadhyay .2007. Thoughts on Anglo-American hegemony in planning scholarship: Do we read each other’s work? Town Planning Review78:545-72.
12.
Webster, C.2006. Ranking planning journals. Environment and Planning B33:485-90.
