The automobile contributes to costly trends like pollution, oil dependence, congestion, and obesity. This article investigates determinants of individual car travel through a comparison of Germany and the USA. Even controlling for socioeconomic variables and spatial development patterns, two comparable national travel surveys show that Germans are less car-dependent than Americans. Multivariate analysis reveals that car travel demand in the USA is more responsive to price than in Germany. Results suggest Americans may more easily reduce driving when faced with increasing gasoline prices. Low costs of driving in the USA may contribute to more discretionary driving, whereas higher costs of car travel in Germany may have already encouraged prudent car use.
Adac.2007. Autokosten 2007. Munich, Germany: Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil Club .
2.
Alterman, R., ed. 2001. National-level planning in democratic countries: A comparative perspective. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
3.
American Public Transport Association (APTA).2008. Transportation factbook. Washington, DC: APTA.
4.
Axhausen, K.W., G.C. Lleras, A. Simma, M.E. Ben-Akiva, A. Schafer, and T. Furutani.2002. Fundamental relationships specifying travel behavior-An international travel survey comparison. Presented at Transportation Research Board Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
5.
BAA.2006. Sozialversicherungspflichtige Beschaeftigte am Arbeitsort. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit, German Federal Agency for Employment .
6.
Banister, D.2005. Unsustainable transportation. New York : Routledge.
7.
Banister, D., J. Pucher, and M. Lee-Gosslin.2007. Making sustainable transport acceptable . In Institutions and sustainable transport: Regulatory reform in advanced economies, ed. P. Rietveld and R. Stough.Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
8.
Baron, P.1995. Transportation in Germany: A historical overview . Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice29 (1) : 9-20.
9.
Ben-Akiva, M., and S.R. Lerman.1985. Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Birkland, T.A.2001. An introduction to the policy process: Theories concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk, NY : M. E. Sharpe.
11.
Bmvbs.1991-2008. Verkehr in Zahlen. German transport in figures. Berlin : German Federal Ministry of Transportation and Urban Development.
12.
Bmvbs.2000. Urban development and urban policy in Germany. Bonn: German Federal Ministry of Transportation and Urban Development, Bundesamt fuer Bauwesen und Raumordnung.
13.
Bmvbs.2004. Mobilitaet in Deutschland-Mobility in Germany survey. Bonn: German Federal Ministry of Transportation and Urban Development.
14.
Boarnet, M., and R. Crane.2001a. The influence of land use on travel behavior: Specification and estimation strategies. Transportation and Research Part A35 (9): 823-45.
15.
Boarnet, M., and R. Crane.2001b. Travel by design. The influence of urban form on travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Bratzel, S.1999. Conditions of success in sustainable urban transport policy-Policy change in "relatively successful" European cities. Transport Reviews19 (2): 177-90.
17.
Brown, J., and G.L. Thompson.2008. The relationship between transit ridership and urban decentralization: Insights from Atlanta. Urban Studies45 (5&6): 1119-39.
18.
Buehler, R.2009. Promoting public transportation: A comparison of passengers and policies in Germany and the U.S. Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Science2110:60-68.
19.
Buehler, R., J. Pucher, and U. Kunert.2009. Making transportation sustainable: Insights from Germany. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS).2006. Energy efficiency of the vehicle fleet. Washington, DC: BTS, Federal Highway Administration .
21.
Button, K.J.1998. The good, the bad and the forgettable-Or lessons the US can learn from European transport policy. Journal of Transport Geography6 (4): 285-94.
22.
Cao, X., P.L. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy.2006. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: Methodologies and empirical findings. Davis: University of California, Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies.
23.
Cervero, R.1998. The transit metropolis. A global inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24.
Chatman, D.2008. Deconstructing development density: Quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel. Transportation Research A42 (7): 1009-31.
25.
Dargay, J., and D. Gately.1999. Income’s effect on vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960-2015. Transportation and Research, Part A33 (2): 101-38.
26.
Deakin, E.2001. Sustainable development and sustainable transport . Berkeley: California Futures Network.
27.
DeJong, G., and H. Gunn.2001. Recent evidence on car cost and time elasticities of travel demand in Europe. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy35 (2): 137-60.
28.
DESTATIS.2003. EVS survey . Wiesbaden: Destatis, German Federal Office for Statistics .
29.
DESTATIS.2005. Statistik Lokal 2003. Wiesbaden: Destatis, German Federal Office for Statistics.
30.
DESTATIS.2007. Bevölkerung und Bodenfläche. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder.
31.
DIW.2004. Mobilitaet in Deutschland 2002. Kontinuierliche Erhebung zum Verkehrsverhalten. Endbericht. Berlin: DIW, German Institute for Economic Research.
32.
DIW.2009. Kraftfahrzeugverkehr 2008 noch auf hohem Niveau. Berlin: DIW, German Institute of Economic Research.
33.
Dunn, J.1981. Miles to go: European and American transportation policies . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
34.
Energy Information Administration (EIA).2008 . Weekly international gasoline prices. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.
35.
Epsey, M.1998. Gasoline demand revisited: An international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Economics20:273-95.
36.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).1990 -2008. Highway statistics. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Flamm, B.2009. The impacts of environmental knowledge and attitudes on vehicle ownership and use. Transportation Research Part D14 (1): 272-79.
40.
Gaerling, T., R. Gillholm, and A. Gaerling.1998. Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research. Transportation25 (1): 129-46.
41.
Giuliano, G., and J. Dargay.2005. Car ownership, travel and land use: A comparison of the US and Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A40:106-24.
42.
Giuliano, G., and D. Narayan.2003. Another look at travel patterns and urban form: The US and Great Britain. Urban Studies40 (11): 2295-2312.
43.
Giuliano, G., and D. Narayan.2004. A comparison of work and non-work travel: The U.S. and Great Britain. In Barriers to sustainable transport , ed. P. Rietveld and R. Stough.London: E.T. Spoon.
44.
Handy, Susan L.1996. Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (3): 183-98.
45.
Handy, Susan L., Lisa Weston, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian .2005. Driving by choice or necessity?Transportation Research Part A39 (3): 183-203.
46.
Hanly, M., J. Dargay, and P. Goodwin.2002. Review of income and price elasticities in the demand for road traffic. London: Department for Transport.
47.
Hirt, S.2007. The devil is in the definitions. Contrasting American and German approaches to zoning. Journal of the American Planning Association73 (4): 436-50.
48.
Ingram, K.G., and Z. Liu.1999. Determinants of motorization and road provision. Washington, DC: World Bank.
49.
International Energy Agency (IEA).2008. Energy prices and taxes. New York: IEA.
50.
International Monetary Fund (IMF).2008. World economic outlook database. Washington, DC : IMF.
51.
International Road Federation (IRF).2007. World road statistics. Brussels, Belgium: IRF.
52.
International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group (IRTAD).2008. Selected risk values for the year 2005 . Paris: IRTAD, OECD.
53.
Kennedy, P.2003. A guide to econometrics. 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
54.
Kenworthy, P., and F. Laube.2001. Millennium cities database. Brussels, Belgium: UITP.
55.
Köhler, U.1995. Traffic and transport planning in German cities . Transportation Research Part A29 (4): 253-61.
56.
Kunert, U., J. Kloas, and H. Kuhfeld.2002. Design characteristics of national travel surveys. International comparison for 10 countries. Transportation Research Record1804: 107-16.
57.
Kunert, U., and O. Lipps.2005. Measuring and explaining the increase of travel distance: A multi-level analysis using repeated cross sectional travel surveys. DIW Discussion Papers. Berlin: DIW, German Institute for Economic Research.
58.
Leipold, H.2000. Die kulturelle Einbettung der Staatsordnung. Buergergesellschaft vs. Sozialstaatsgesellschaft. In Wirtschaftlicher SystemvergleichDeutschland USA, ed. B. Wentzel and D. Wentzel.Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius and Lucius .
59.
Levine, J.2006. Zoned out. Regulation, markets and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
60.
Litman, T.2007. Transportation elasticities. Victoria , Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute .
61.
McCarthy, P.S.2001. Transportation economics. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
62.
Meyer, J., J.F. Kain, and M. Wohl.1965. The urban transportation problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
63.
National Resource Inventory (NRI).2006. National resources inventory: Urbanization. Washington, DC: NRI, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
64.
Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy.1996. The land use-transport connection-An overview. Land Use Policy13 (1): 1-22.
65.
Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy.1999. Sustainability and cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
66.
Newman, P., J. Kenworthy, and F. Laube.1999. An international sourcebook of automobile dependence in cities, 1960-1990. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
67.
Oak Ridge National Laboratories (ORNL).2003 . Household distance to transit file. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy, ORNL.
68.
Ornl.2005. National household travel survey 2001. Version 2004. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy, ORNL.
69.
Ornl.2008. Transportation energy data book. 26th ed. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy, ORNL.
70.
Polzin, S., and X. Chu.2003. NHTS early findings on public transportation travel trends. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
71.
Pucher, J.1988. Urban travel behavior as outcome of public policy . APA Journal54 (4): 509-20.
72.
Pucher, J.1995a. Urban passenger transport in the United States and Europe: A comparative analysis of public policies. Part 1. Travel behavior, urban development and automobile use. Transport Reviews15 (2): 99-117.
73.
Pucher, J.1995b. Urban passenger transport in the United States and Europe: A comparative analysis of public policies. Part 2. Public transport, overall comparisons and recommendations. Transport Reviews15 (3): 211-27.
74.
Pucher, J., and R. Buehler.2008. Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Transport Reviews28 (1): 495-528.
75.
Pucher, J., J. Dill, and S.L. Handy.2010. Infrastructure, programs and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine48 (1): S106-25.
76.
Pucher, J., and S. Kurth.1995. Making transit irresistible: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Quarterly49 (1): 117-28.
77.
Pucher, J., and C. Lefevre.1996. The urban transport crisis in Europe and North America. London: Macmillan .
78.
Pucher, J., and J.L. Renne.2003. Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly57 (3): 49-77.
79.
Puentes, R.2003. A primer on the gas tax. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
80.
Quinet, E., and R. Vickermann.2004. Principles of transport economics . Northhampton, MA: Edgar Elgar .
81.
Rönnau, H.J.2004. Anforderungen and die Verkehrsfinanzierung- Strategien fuer neue Organisationsstrukturen und Finanzierungsinstrumente im ÖV. In SRL Halbjahrestagung. http://www.srl.de/termine/hjt2004-06-10/roennau.pdf .
82.
Sanchez, T.W.1999. The connection between public transit and employment . Journal of the American Planning Association65 (3): 284-96.
83.
Sanchez, T.W., Q. Shen, and Zhong-ren Peng.2004. Transit mobility, jobs access and low income labour participation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Studies41 (7): 1313-31.
84.
Schafer, A.1999. Regularities in travel demand: An international perspective . Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
85.
Schafer, A., and D.G. Victor.2000. The future mobility of the world population . Transportation Research Part A34: 171-205.
86.
Schmucki, B.2001. Der Traum vom Verkehrsfluss: Städtische Verkehrsplanung seit 1945 im deutsch-deutschen Vergleich. Munich, Germany: Campus/Deutsches Museum Muenchen.
87.
Schulz, B., and F. Dosch.2005. Trends der Siedlungsflaechenentwicklung und ihre Steuerung in der Schweiz und Deutschland. disP The Planning Review16041 (1): 5-22. http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/en/content/view/full/985 .
88.
Schwanen, T.2002. Urban form and commuting behavior a crossEuropean comparison. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie93 (3): 336-43.
89.
Simma, A., and K.W. Axhausen.2001. Structures of commitment in mode use: A comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain. Transport Policy8:279-88.
90.
Simma, A., and K.W. Axhausen.2003. Commitments and modal usage: An analysis of German and Dutch panels. Transportation Research Record1854: 22-31.
91.
STATA Listserve.2003. Interpretation of OLS coeff after Heckman selection. http://www.stata.com/statalist/ .
92.
Stead, D., and S. Marshall.2001. The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1 (2): 113-41.
93.
Timmermanns, H., P. van der Waerden, M. Alves, J. Polak, S. Ellis, A.S. Harvey, S. Kurose, and R. Zandee.2003. Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: An international comparison. Journal of Transport Geography11: 37-46.
94.
Transportation Research Board (TRB).2001. Making transit work: Insight from Western Europe, Canada and the United States . Washington DC: TRB, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
UBA.2005b. Vergleich der Schadstoffemissionen einzelner Verkehrstraeger. Dessau , Germany: Umweltbundesamt.
97.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).2000 -2003. Consumer expenditure survey. Washington, DC: BLS.
98.
U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC).2006. U.S. Gazetteer files 2000 and 1990. Washington, DC: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau.
99.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).2007. Transportation energy intensity indicators. Washington, DC: DOE.
100.
Vance, C., and R. Hedel.2008. On the link between urban form and automobile use: Evidence from German survey data. Land Economics84 (1): 51-65.
101.
VDA.2007. Automobilproduktion in Deutschland. Offenbach, Germany: Verband der Automobilindustrie.
102.
VDV.2008. VDV Jahresbericht 2007/2008. Cologne, Germany: Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen.
103.
Vuchic, V.1999. Transportation for livable cities. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research .
104.
Wachs, M., M. Crawford, S. Wirka, and T. Rikala.1992. The car and the city: The automobile, the built environment, and daily urban life. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
105.
Wolf, W.1986. Eisenbahn und Autowahn: Personen- und Guetertransport auf Schiene und Strasse; Geschichte, Bilanz, Perspektiven. Hamburg, Germany: Rasch und Roehrig.
106.
Yago, G.1984. The decline of transit: Urban transportation in German and U.S. cities, 1900-1970. New York: Cambridge University Press.
