Some jurisdictions in the United States have enacted green building policies and incentives that use a building assessment system to rate their sustainability. One such system is Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). Using data from a survey of LEED policy administrators and a comparison of LEED policies, this research seeks to understand the status and structure of such policies, their impacts on the built environment, how they work in practice, and the role of planners. The article outlines three types of policies that use the LEED system— government requirements, requirements for private development, and incentives— and finds that LEED policies have been very narrowly applied. Planners have an important role in administering green building polices because they address issues beyond building design and construction and require a holistic and integrative perspective.
Anderson, Brian D.2006. Legal and business issues of green building. Wisconsin Lawyer79:10.
2.
Berke, P.R., and M. Manta Conroy .2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association66 (1): 21-33.
3.
Bowmar, Jennifer, and Laurie Wireman.2008. Hopping on the green wagon: How corporations can overcome potential political and legal pitfalls associated sustainability initiatives. University of Cincinnati Law Review76:1479-95.
4.
Bowyer, Jim L.2007. Green building programs-Are they really green?Forest Products Journal57 (9): 6-17.
5.
Busch, Jason R., Rosemary A. Colliver, and Janet F. Jacobs .2008. Tax and financial incentives for green building. Los Angeles Lawyer30 (10): 15-19.
6.
Byrne, Michael.2008. Greening runoff: The unsolved nonpoint source pollution problem, and green buildings as a solution. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy11:145-76.
7.
Circo, Carl J.2008. Using mandates and incentives to promote sustainable construction and green building projects in the private sector: A call for more state land use policy initiatives. Pennsylvania State Law Review112:731-82.
8.
Codiga, Douglas A.1999. Building environmental assessment methods: Clarifying intentions. Building Research and Information27 (4/5): 230-46.
9.
Codiga, Douglas A.2004. Changing context for environmental knowledge. Building Research and Information32 (2): 91-109.
10.
Codiga, Douglas A.2006. Shared markets: Coexisting building environmental assessment methods. Building Research and Information34 (4): 357-71.
11.
Codiga, Douglas A.2008. Hawaii’s climate change law. Hawaii Bar Journal12:4-14.
12.
Cole, Raymond.2005. Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Building Research and Information35 (5): 455-67.
13.
Conroy, Maria Manta.2006. Moving the middle ahead: Challenges and opportunities of sustainability in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. Journal of Planning Education and Research26:18-27.
14.
Cooper, Ian.1997. Environmental assessment methods for use at the building and city scales: Constructing bridges or identifying common ground? In Evaluation of the built environment for sustainability , ed. P. S. Brandon, P. L. Lombardi , and V. Bentivegna, 1-5. London : E & FN Spon.
15.
Cooper, Ian.1999. Which focus for building assessment methods-Environmental performance or sustainability? Building Research and Information27 (4/5): 321-31.
16.
Crawley, Drury, and Ilari Aho.1999. Building environmental assessment methods: Applications and development trends. Building Research and Information27 (4/5): 300-08.
17.
Environmental Law Institute.2008. Municipal green building policies: Strategies for transforming building practices in the private sector. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
18.
Gruder, Sherrie.2007. Government green building programs inventory. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Solid and Hazardous Waste Education Center.
19.
Guy, Simon.2006. Designing urban knowledge: Competing perspectives on energy and buildings. Environment and Planning C24:645-59.
20.
Hill, Richard C., and Paul A. Bowen .1997. Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment. Construction Management and Economics15:223-39.
21.
Horst, Scot, and Joel Ann Todd.2008. LEED’s Next generation-A response . Building Research and Information36 (2): 206-07.
22.
Hutcheon, N.B., and G. Handegord.1983. Building science for a cold climate . Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
Irvin, T. Rick, Peter A. Appel, Julie M. McEntire, and J. Chris Rabon .2008. Kyoto comes to Georgia: How international environmental initiatives foster sustainable commerce in small town America. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law36:559-613.
24.
Jabareen, Yosef Rafeq.2006. Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research26:38-52.
25.
Jepson, Edward Jr.2001. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature15 (4): 499-510.
26.
Jepson, Edward Jr.2004. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners?Journal of Planning Education and Research23:229-41.
27.
Jonsson, Asa.2000. Tools and methods for environmental assessment of building products-Methodological analysis of six selected approaches. Building and Environment35:223-38.
28.
Kaatz, Ewelina, David Root, and Paul Bowen.2005. Broadening project participation through a modified building sustainability assessment. Building Research and Information33 (5): 441-54.
29.
Kaatz, Ewelina, David Root, Paul A. Bowen, and Richard C. Hill .2006. Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Building Research and Information34 (4): 308-20.
30.
Kats, Greg and E. Capital.2003. The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: A report to California’s sustainable building task force. Sacramento: California Sustainable Building Task Force .
31.
Kibert, Charles J., and Kevin Grosskopf .2007. Envisioning next generation green buildings. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law23:145-60.
32.
King, Nancy J., and Brian J. King .2005. Creating incentives for sustainable buildings: A comparative law approach featuring the United States and the European Union. Virginia Environmental Law Journal23:397-459.
33.
Kingsley, Benjamin S.2008. Making it easy to be green: Using impact fees to encourage green building. New York University Law Review83:532-67.
34.
Kohler, Niklaus.1999. The relevance of green building challenge: An observer’s perspective. Building Research and Information27 (4/5): 309-20.
35.
Laitner, Meredith, Adam Stella, and Madeline Zamoyski .2008. Green building city survey . New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy11:81-103.
36.
Liu, Yu, Deo Prasad, Jing Li, and Jinghua Liu .2006. Developing regionally specific environmental building tools for China. Building Research and Information34 (4): 372-86.
37.
Lutzendorf, Thomas, and David P. Lorenz .2006. Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Building Research and Information34 (4): 334-56.
38.
Mazira, Edward.2003. It’s the architecture, stupid!Solar Today (May/June):48-51.
39.
McKinstry, Robert B. Jr.2004. Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: State, local, and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the causes and effects of climate change. Pennsylvania State Environmental Law Review12:15-82.
40.
Mermin, Naomi, Rebecca Morley, Kevin Powell, and Ellen Tohn.2006. Comparing green building guidelines and healthy homes principles: A preliminary investigation. Columbia, MD: National Center for Healthy Housing.
41.
Nelson, Arthur C.2004. Toward a new metropolis: The opportunity to rebuild America . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
42.
Nelson, Peter A.2008. Measuring from the high watermark: Defining baselines for water efficiency in green buildings. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy11:105-44.
43.
Northrup, Michael.2004. Leading by example: Profitable corporate strategies and successful public policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Widener Law Journal14:21-59.
44.
Olgyay, Victor, and Julee Herdt.2004. The application of ecosystems services criteria for green building assessment. Solar Energy77:389-98.
45.
Osofsky, Hari M., and Janet Koven Levit .2008. The scale of networks: Local climate change coalitions. Chicago Journal of International Law8:409-36.
46.
Owens, Katherine A., and Angela Halfacre Hitchcock.2006. As green as we think? The case of the College of Charleston green building initiative. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education7 (2): 114-28.
47.
Park, Eunjung.2007. The U.S. federal green building policy. Sustainable Development Law and Policy8 (1): 71.
48.
Perzan, Christopher P.2006. What you should know about green building. Chicago Bar Association Journal20:38-43.
49.
Rainwater, Brook.2007. Local leaders in sustainability: A study of green building programs in our nation’s communities. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.
50.
Rainwater, Brook.2008. Local leaders in sustainability: Green counties . Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.
51.
Retzlaff, Rebecca.2005. Building green: Onus or bonus? Zoning Practice . Chicago: American Planning Association .
52.
Retzlaff, Rebecca.2008. Green building assessment systems: A framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (4): 505-19.
53.
Rosenberg, Samuel I.2001. House Bill 8: Income tax credit for green buildings . University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law9:53-54.
54.
Rutgers Center for Green Building. n.d.a. An analysis of green building best management practices: Implementation recommendations to the NJMC. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Green Building.
55.
Rutgers Center for Green Building. n.d.b. An analysis of residential and local green building initiatives: The roles of information and incentive. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Green Building.
56.
Saha, Devashree, and Robert G. Paterson .2008. Local government efforts to promote the "three Es" of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (1): 21-37.
57.
Smith, Timothy, Miriam Fischlein, Sangwon Suh, and Pat Huelman .2006. Green building rating systems: A comparison of the LEED and Green Globes systems in the U.S. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58.
Sussman, Edna.2007. Building stock offers opportunities to foster sustainability and provides tools for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Sustainable Development Law and Policy7 (3): 17.
59.
Sussman, Edna.2008. Reshaping municipal and county laws to foster green building, energy efficiency, and renewable energy. New York University Environmental Law Journal16:1-43.
Sutak, Sandra.2008. Green schools, brown fields: School siting legislation provides a weak foundation. Tulane Environmental Law Journal21:427-47.
62.
Swing, Bradford.2008. Project-based policy development: Building the case for Boston’s green building policy. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy11:33-78.
63.
Theaker, Ian, and Raymond Cole.2001. The role of local governments in fostering "green" buildings: A case study. Building Research and Information29 (5): 394-408.
64.
Todd, Joel Ann, Drury Crawley, Susanne Geissler, and Gail Lindsay.2001. Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the green building challenge. Building Research and Information29 (5): 324-35.
65.
Todd, Joel Ann, and Susanne Geissler .1999. Regional and cultural issues in environmental performance assessment for buildings. Building Research and Information27 (4/5): 247-56.
66.
Turner, R.K.2006. Sustainability auditing and assessment challenges . Building Research and Information34 (3): 197-200.
67.
United States Environmental Protection Agency.2004. Buildings and the environment: A statistical summary. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/gbstats.pdf (accessed February 15, 2008).
68.
United States Green Building Council.2007 . Leadership in energy and environmental design. http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19 (accessed June 18, 2007).
69.
United States Green Building Council.2008 . U.S. Green Building Council set to modify LEED standards . http://www.usgbc.org/News/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?ID=3743 (accessed October 2, 2008).
70.
United States Green Building Council.2009 . Frequently asked questions. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=3330 (accessed January 30, 2009).
71.
Zhang, Zhihui, Xing Wu, Xiaomin Yang, and Yimin Zhu.2006. BEPAS-A life cycle building environmental performance assessment model. Building and Environment41:669-75.
