Alexander, E.R.1992. A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association58 (2): 190-200.
2.
Alexander, E.R.1995. How organizations act together : Interorganizational coordination in theory and practice. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
3.
Alexander, E.R.2001a. Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: A conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control-The case of Israel. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design28 (5): 755-76.
4.
Alexander, E.R.2001b. A transaction-cost theory of land use planning and development control. Town Planning Review72 (1): 45-75.
5.
Alexander, E.R.2001c. Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: Asking the right question. Planning and Markets4 (1). http://www.-pam.usc.edu/index.html .
6.
Alexander, E.R.2002. Metropolitan regional planning in Amsterdam: A case study . Town Planning Review73 (1): 17-40.
7.
Alexander, E.R.2004. Planning planning: Reflections on redesigning the Planning and Building Law [in Hebrew]. Planning (IAP)1 (2): 3-11.
8.
Alexander, E.R.2005. Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory4 (3): 209-23.
9.
Alexander, E.R.2006. Institutional design for sustainable development. Town Planning Review77 (1): 1-27.
10.
Alterman, R., ed. 2001. National level planning in democratic countries. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
11.
Brandl, J.1988. On politics and policy analysis as the design and assessment of institutions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management7 (3): 419-24.
12.
Christensen, K.S.1999. Cities and complexity: Making intergovernmental decisions . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Donaghy, K.P., and L.D. Hopkins.2006. Coherentist theories of planning are possible and useful. Planning Theory5 (2): 173-202.
14.
Friend, J.K., and W.N. Jessop.1969. Local government and strategic choice: An operational research approach to the processes of public planning. London: Tavistock.
15.
Gualini, E.2001. Planning and the intelligence of institutions. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
16.
Hopkins, L.D.2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
Hopkins, L.D.2006. Plans work in complexity. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference , Dallas, TX.
18.
Innes, J.E.2004. Consensus building: Clarification for the critics. Planning Theory3 (1): 5-20.
19.
Innes, J.E.2005. Planning is institutional design. Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (2): 140-43.
20.
March, J.C., and H.A. Simon (with H. Guetzow). 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Miller, G.J.1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy . New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Moore, T.1978. Why allow planners to do what they do? A justification from economic theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners44 (4): 387-98.
23.
Secretary of the Interior v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004).
24.
Susskind, L.D., and J. Cruikshank.1987. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Susskind, L. D., S. McKearnan , and J. Thomas-Larmer, eds. 1999. The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Webster, C., and L.W.-C. Lai .2003. Property rights, planning, and markets. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
27.
Wolsink, M.2003. Reshaping the Dutch planning system: A learning process? . Environment and Planning A35 (4): 705-23.