This study seeks to provide supportive information for the planning of existing or new employment centers in metropolitan regions. It examines how the spatial concentration of office uses and their combination with other land uses affects the assessed value of office properties. The goal is to measure the spatial clustering of office uses and the clusters' physical characteristics to quantify their association with office property values. The characteristics of interest include cluster size, regional location and relationship to transportation infrastructure, internal land use mix, and transportation network. The study revealed that recent office development has continued to benefit economically from agglomeration. Office property values seemed to be most positively affected by, in order of importance, the intensity of office development, a central regional location, and the clustering or agglomeration of office parcels.
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.1987. The appraisal of real estate. 9th ed. Chicago: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.
2.
Anderson, N.B., and W.T. Bogart.2001. The structure of sprawl: Identifying and characterizing employment centers in poly-centric metropolitan areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology60:147-69.
3.
ArcView.1996. Computer software. Version 3.2. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
4.
Beeson, P.1987. Total factor productivity growth and agglomeration economies in manufacturing. Journal of Regional Science27:183-99.
5.
Butler, K., S. Handy, and R. Paterson.2003. Planning for street connectivity: Getting from here to there. Washington, DC: APA Planning Advisory Service.
6.
Cervero, R.1989. Jobs-housing balance and regional mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association55 (2): 136-50.
7.
---. 2001. Efficient urbanization: Economic performance and the shape of the metropolis. Urban Studies38:1651-71.
8.
Clapp, J.M., and C. Giaccotto.1992. Estimating price trends for residential property: A comparison of repeat sales and assessed value methods. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics5 (4): 357-74.
9.
Coffey, W.J., and R.G. Shearmur.1997. Growth and location of high order services in the Canadian urban system, 1971-1991. Professional Geographer49 (4): 404-18.
10.
---. 2001. The identification of employment centres in Canadian metropolitan areas: The example of Montreal, 1996. The Canadian Geographer45:371-86.
11.
Department of Assessments, King County, WA.1999. Real property assessments. http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/RealProperty.htm.
12.
Fenske, G., and R.G. Shearmur.1992. Corporate capitalism and the New York skyscraper. In The landscape of modernity: Essays onNew York City, ed. D. Ward and O. Zung.New York: Russell Sage.
13.
Forstall, R.L., and R.P. Greene.1997. Defining job concentrations: The Los Angeles case. Urban Geography18:705-39.
14.
Fujii, T., and T.A. Hartshorn.1995. The changing metropolitan structure of Atlanta, GA: Locations of functions and regional structure in a multinucleated urban area. Urban Geography16:680-707.
15.
Fulton, W.1986. Offices in the Dell. Planning52 (7): 13-17.
16.
Galliano, D., and P. Roux.2001. Spatial externalities, organization of the firm and ICT adoption: The specificities of French agro-food firms . http://www.toulouse.inra.fr/centre/esr/wpRePEc/gal200115.pdf .
17.
Giuliano, G., and K.A. Small.1999. The determinants of growth of employment subcenters. Journal of Transport Geography7:189-201.
18.
Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J. Scheinkman, and A. Schleifer.1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy100:1126-52.
19.
Harris, C.D., and E.L. Ullman.1945. The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science242:7-17.
20.
Henderson, J.V., A. Kuncoro, and M. Turner.1995. Industrial development and cities. Journal of Political Economy103:1067-81.
21.
Hess, P.M., A.V. Moudon, M.C. Snyder, and K. Stanilov.1999. Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record1674:9-19.
22.
Hoover, E.M.1937. Location theory and the shoe and leather industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Jacobs, J.1969. Economy of cities. London: Jonathan Cape.
24.
Janssen, C., and B. Soderberg.1999. Estimating market prices and assessed values for income properties. Urban Studies36 (2): 359-76.
25.
Kim, S., and G. Ulfarsson.2004. Travel mode choice of the elderly: Effects of personal, household, neighborhood, and trip characteristics. Transportation Research Record1894:117-26.
26.
Knaap, G., and E. Talen.2005. New urbanism and smart growth: A few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review28 (2): 107-18.
27.
Lang, R.E.2003. Edgeless cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28.
Lee, C., and A.V. Moudon.2006. The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transportation and Environment11 (3): 204-15.
29.
Leigh, N.G., and S.L. Coffin.2005. Modeling the relationship among brownfields, property values, and community revitalization. Housing Policy Debate16 (2): 257-80.
30.
McDonald, J.F.1987. The identification of urban employment centers: the case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics21: 242-58.
31.
McMillan, D.P., and L.T. William.2003. Evolving subcenters: Employment and population densities in Chicago, 1970-2020. Journal of Housing Economics12:60-81.
32.
Moudon, A.V., and P.M. Hess.2000. Suburban clusters: The nucleation of multifamily housing in suburban areas in the Central Puget Sound. Journal of the American Planning Association66 (3): 243-63.
33.
Mun, S., and B.G. Hutchinson .1995. Empirical analysis of office rent and agglomeration economies: A case study of Toronto. Journal of Regional Science35:437-55.
34.
Nakamura, R.1985. Agglomeration economies in urban manufacturing industries: A case of Japanese cities. Journal of Urban Economics17 (1): 108-24.
35.
Orford, S.1998. Valuing location in an urban housing market. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
36.
O'Sullivan, A.2003. Urban economics. 5th ed. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
37.
Pivo, G.1990. The net of mixed beads: Suburban office development in six metropolitan regions. Journal of American Planning Association56 (Autumn): 457-69.
38.
---. 1993. A taxonomy of suburban office clusters: The case of Toronto . Urban Studies30:31-49.
39.
Porter, M.2001. Regions and the new economics of competition. In Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy, ed. A. J. Scott.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Puget Sound Regional Council.1997. Urban centers in the Central Puget Sound Region. Seattle : Puget Sound Regional Council.
