What is the connection among the moral, social, and physical aspects of the community? To explore this question, this article reviews three approaches: communitarianism, social capital, and new urbanism and smart growth. They are linked by a conceptual mapping along two dimensions: geographical scale (local to global) and strength of community (strong to weak). The approaches meld at local and regional geographical scales. Since the strong community in all three is susceptible to community determinism, I privilege the weak community. The approaches put a renewed emphasis on public and civic spaces, which are moral, social, and physical spaces for the weak community.
Amster, R.2004. Street people and the contested realms of public space . New York: LFB Scholarly Publishers .
2.
Audirac, I.1999. Stated preference for pedestrian proximity: An assessment of new urbanist sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research19:53-66.
3.
Banerjee, T.2001. The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American Planning Association67:9-24.
4.
Barber, B.1984. Strong democracy: Participatory democracy for a new age . Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
---. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine.
6.
---. 1998. A place for us: How to make society civil and democracy strong. New York: Hill and Wang .
7.
Baron, S., J. Field, and T. Schuller.2000. Social capital: Critical perspectives . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Beatley, T.2004. Native to nowhere: Sustaining home and community in a global age. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.
9.
Beito, D.,P. Gordon , and A. Tabarrok, eds. 2002. The voluntary city: Choice, community, and civil society . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Bell D.1993. Communitarianism and its critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
---. 1998. Residential community associations: Community or disunity? In The essential communitarian reader, ed. A. Etzioni.Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
Bellah, R., R. Madsen, W. Sullivan, A. Swidler, and S. Tipton, eds. 1986. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. 2nd ed. 1996. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
---. 1991. The good society. New York: Knopf.
14.
Benhabib, S.1992. Situating the self: Gender, community, and post-modernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.
15.
---. 2002. The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Bennett, L.1998. Do we really wish to live in a Communitarian city? Communitarian thinking and the redevelopment of Chicago's Cabrini-Green Public Housing Complex . Journal of Urban Affairs20:99-116.
17.
Blakely, E., and M.G. Snyder.1997. Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution;Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy .
18.
Boggs, C.2001. Social capital and political fantasy: Robert Putnam's "bowling alone." Theory and Society30:281-97.
19.
Boix, C., and D. Posner.1998. The origins and political consequences of social capital. British Journal of Political Science29: 686-93.
20.
Bothwell, S.E., R. Gindroz, and R.E. Lang.1998. Restoring community through traditional neighborhood design: A case study of Diggs Town public housing. Housing Policy Debate9:89-114.
21.
Bourdieu, P.1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, ed. J. G. Richardson.New York: Greenwood.
22.
Boyer, C.M.1996. Cybercities: Visual perception in the age of electronic communication. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
23.
Brazley, M., and J.I. Gilderbloom .2007. HOPE VI Housing Program: Was it effective? American Journal of Economics and Sociology66:433-42.
24.
Bridge, G.2005. Reason in the city of difference: Pragmatism, communicative action and contemporary urbanism. London and New York: Routledge.
25.
Briggs, X.1998. Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate9:177-221.
26.
Brisson, D., and C.L. Usher.2007. The effects of informal neighborhood bonding social capital and neighborhood context on homeownership for families living in poverty. Journal Of Urban Affairs29:65-75.
27.
Brown, B.B., and V.L. Cropper.2001. New urban and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association67:402-19.
28.
Burchell, R.W., G. Lowenstein, W.R. Dolphin, C.C. Galley, A. Downs, S. Seskin, K.G. Still, and T. Moore.2002. Costs of sprawl- 2000 (TCRP Report 74) . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_74-a.pdf (accessed June 2007).
29.
Calthorpe, P.1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
30.
---. 2001. The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, D.C: Island Press.
31.
Castells, M.2000. The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
32.
Chambers, D.2006. New social ties: Contemporary connections in a fragmented society. Basingstoke, U.K., and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
Colclough, G., and B. Sitaraman.2005. Community and social capital: What is the difference? Sociological Inquiry75:474-96.
34.
Coleman, J.1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94:S95-S120.
35.
---. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
36.
---. 1993. The rational reconstruction of society. American Sociological Review58:1-15.
37.
Community Associations Institute.2007. Community Associations Institute: Industry data. http://caionline.org/about/facts.cfm (accessed June 2007).
38.
Crane, R.1996. Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of American Planning Association62:51-65.
39.
Crang, M.2000. Public space, urban space and electronic space: Would the real city please stand up?Urban Studies37:301-317.
40.
Crawford, A.2006. Fixing broken promises? Neighbourhood wardens and social capital. Urban Studies43:957-76.
41.
Danielsen, K.A., R.E. Lang, and W. Fulton.1999. Retracting suburbia: Smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate10:513-40.
42.
Das, R.J.2006. Putting social capital in its place. Capital and Class90:65-92.
43.
Day, K.2003. New urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity . Journal of Planning Education and Research23:83-95.
44.
Dean, J.2001. Cybersalons and civil society: Rethinking the public sphere in transnational technoculture. Public Culture13:243-65.
45.
DeFilippis, J.2001. The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate12:781-806.
46.
Delanty, G.2003. Community: Key ideas. London and New York: Routledge.
47.
Dionne, E.J.1998. Community works: The revival of civil society in America . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
48.
Dixon, J., R. Dogan, and A. Sanderson.2005. Community and communitarianism: A philosophical investigation. Community Development Journal40:4-16.
49.
Driskell, R.B., and L. Lyon.2002. Are virtual communities true communities? Examining the environments and elements of community. City & Community1:373-90.
50.
Duany, A.2003a. The new civic art: Elements of town planning. New York: Rizzoli.
51.
---. 2003b. Neighbourhood Design in Practice. In Urban villages and the making of communities, ed. P. Neal.London and New York: Spon.
52.
Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck.2000. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.
53.
Easterbrook, G.1999. Suburban myth. New Republic (March 15): 18-21.
54.
Edwards, B., and M.W. Foley.1997. Social capital and the political economy of our discontent. American Behavioral Scientist40:669-78.
55.
---. 1998. Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist42:124-39.
56.
Elin, L.2003. The radicalization of Zeke Spier: How the Internet contributes to civic engagement and new forms of social capital. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, ed. M. McCaughey and M. D. Ayers.London: Routledge
57.
Ellis, C.2002. The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design7:261-91.
58.
Etzioni, A.1992. Do fence me in. The Wall Street Journal , December 1:A16.
59.
---. 1993. The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.
60.
---. ed. 1995. New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
61.
---. 1996. The new Golden Rule: Community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books.
62.
---. 2003. My brother's keeper: A memoir and a message. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
63.
---. 2004. From empire to community: A new approach to international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
Ewing, R.1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of American Planning Association63:107-26.
65.
Fainstein, S.2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review35:451-78.
66.
Fletcher, J.2007. Don't fence me out: Developers, cities duel over gated green space; trespassers share tips. Wall Street Journal, May 25:W1.
67.
Flora, J.L., and B.L. Allen.2006. Introduction: Community development and social capital. Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society37:1-4.
68.
Florida, R.L.2005. Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.
69.
Foley, M.W., and B. Edwards.1997. Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate. American Behavioral Scientist40:550-61.
70.
Frazer, E.1999. The problems of communitarian politics: Unity and conflict . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71.
Frumkin, H., L.D. Frank, and R. Jackson.2004. Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities. Washington , Covelo, London: Island Press.
72.
Gans, H.1967. The Levittowners: Ways of life and politics in a new suburban community. New York: Random House .
73.
Garde, A.M.2004. New urbanism as sustainable growth? A supply side story and its implications for public policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research24:154-70.
74.
---. 2006. Designing and developing new urbanist projects in the United States: Insights and implications. Journal of Urban Design11:33-54.
75.
Garreau, J.1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.
76.
Gittell, M., I. Ortega-Bustamante, and T. Steffy.2000. Social capital and social change: Women's community activism. Urban Affairs Review36:123-47.
77.
Gittell, R., and A. Vidal.1998. Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Glendon, M.A.1991. Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse . New York: Free Press.
79.
Goodsell, C.T.2003. The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations . The American Review of Public Administration33:361-83.
80.
Gordon, D.2003. New urbanism and smart growth: Twins separated at birth ? Places2:68-70.
81.
Gordon, P., and H.W. Richardson .1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association63:95-107.
82.
---. 1998. Prove it: The costs and benefits of sprawl. The Brookings Review16:23-25.
83.
---. 2000. Defending Urban Sprawl. Public Interest139:65-71.
84.
---. 2004. Exit and voice in U.S. settlement change. The Review of Austrian Economics17:187-202.
85.
Granovetter, M.S.1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology78:1360-80.
86.
Grant, J.2006. Planning the good community: New urbanism in theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
87.
Green, G.P., and A. Haines.2002. Asset building and community development . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
Hall, K.B., and G.A. Porterfield .2001. Community by design: New urbanism for suburbs and small communities. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
89.
Hampton, K.N., and B. Wellman.2003. Neighbouring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community2:277-311.
90.
Harper, T.L., and S.M. Stein.1992. The centrality of normative ethical theory to contemporary planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research11:105-116.
91.
Harvey, D.1997. The new urbanism and the communitarian trap. Harvard Design Magazine1:1-3.
92.
---. 2000. Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.
93.
Hoch, C.2006. Planning to keep the doors open for moral communities . Planning Theory5:127-45.
94.
Holcombe, R.G.2004. The new urbanism versus the market process. The Review of Austrian Eonomics17:285-300.
95.
hooks, b.. and A. Mesa-Bains.2006. Homegrown: Engaged cultural criticism . Cambridge, MA: South End.
96.
Iglitzin, L.B.1995. The Seattle Commons: A case study in the politics and planning of an urban village. Policy Studies Journal23:620-35.
97.
Johnson, M.P.2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A33:717-35.
98.
Joseph, M.2002. Against the romance of community. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
99.
Katz, P.1994. The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community . New York: McGraw-Hill.
100.
Kayden, J.S.2005. Using and misusing law to design the public realm. . In Regulating place: Standards and the shaping of urban, ed. E. Ben-Joseph and T. S. Szold.New York: Routledge .
101.
Kelbaugh, D.2002a. Repairing the American metropolis: Common place revisited . Seattle: University of Washington Press.
102.
---. 2002b. Seattle Commons, Seattle, Washington. In The seaside debates: A critique of the new urbanism, ed. Todd Bressi.New York: Rizzoli.
103.
Kelling, G.L., and J.Q. Wilson.1982. Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly249:29-38.
104.
Kelling, G.L., and C.M. Coles.1996. Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Free Press.
105.
Kim, J., and R. Kaplan.2004. Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior36:313-40.
106.
Kunstler, J.H.1993. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America's man-made landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
107.
---. 1996. Home from nowhere: Remaking our everyday world for the twenty-first century. New York: Simon & Schuster.
108.
---. 2001. The city in mind: Meditations on the urban condition. New York: Free Press.
109.
Larsen, K.2005. New urbanism's role in inner-city neighborhood revitalization . Housing Studies20:795-813.
110.
Larsen, L., S.L. Harlan, B. Bolin, E.J. Hackett, D. Hope, A. Kirby, A. Nelson, T.R. Rex, and S. Wolf.2004. Bonding and bridging: Understanding the relationship between social capital and civic action. Journal of Planning Education and Research24: 64-77.
111.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., E. Blumenberg, and R. Ehrenfeucht.2005. Sidewalk democracy: Municipalities and the regulation of public space. In Regulating place: Standards and the shaping of urban, ed. E. Ben-Joseph and T. S. Szold.New York: Routledge.
112.
Lund, H.2002. Pedestrian environments and sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research21:301-12.
113.
MacIntyre, A.1981. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
114.
---. 1999. Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago and La Salle, IL : Open Court.
115.
---. 2007. After virtue: A study in moral theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
116.
Mandelbaum, S.2000. Open moral communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
117.
Markovich, J., and S. Hendler.2006. Beyond "soccer moms": Feminist and new urbanist critical approaches to suburbs. Journal of Planning Education and Research25:410-27.
118.
Martin, D.2002. Spatial patterns in residential burglary: Assessing the effect of neighborhood social capital. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice18:132-46.
119.
McBride, K.D.2005. Collective dreams: Political imagination and community . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
120.
McKenzie, E.1994. Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven: Yale University Press.
121.
---. 2003. Common interest housing in the communities of tomorrow . Housing Policy Debate14:203-34.
122.
McMillan, D.W., and D.M. Chavis.1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology14:6-23.
123.
Mouffe, C.2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
124.
Nasar, J.L.2003. Does neotraditional development build community? Journal of Planning Education and Research23:58-68.
125.
Neal, P., ed. 2003. Urban villages and the making of communities. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Routledge.
126.
Neuman, M.2005. The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research25:11-26.
127.
Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy.1989. Cities and automobile dependence: An international sourcebook. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
128.
Newton, K.1997. Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist40:575-86.
129.
Oldenburg, R.1999. The great good place. New York: Marlowe and Company.
130.
Oliver, J.E.2001. Democracy in suburbia. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
131.
Papacharissi, Z.2002. The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society4:9-27.
132.
Persky, J.J., and W. Wiewel.2000. When corporations leave town: The costs and benefits of metropolitan job sprawl. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
133.
Podobnik, B.2002. New urbanism and the generation of social capital: Evidence from Orenco Station. National Civic Review91: 245-55.
134.
Popkin, S.J., B. Katz, M.K. Cunningham, K.D. Brown, J. Gustafson, and M.A. Turner.2004. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411002_HOPEVI.pdf (accessed June 2007).
135.
Popkin, S.J., D. Levy, L.E. Harris, J. Comey, and M.K. Cunningham .2004. The HOPE VI Program: What about the residents?Housing Policy Debate15:385-414.
136.
Portes, A.1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24:1-24.
137.
---. 2000. The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum15:1-12.
138.
Portes, A., and P. Landolt.1996. The downside of social capital. The American Prospect26:18-21, 94.
139.
Portes, A., and M. Mooney.2002. Social capital and community development . In The new economic sociology: Development in an emerging field, ed. M. F. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, and M. Meyer.New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
140.
Portney, K.E., and J.M. Berry.1997. Mobilizing minority communities: Social capital and participation in urban neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist40:632-44.
141.
Putnam, R.D.2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
142.
---., ed. 2002. Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
143.
Putnam, R.D., and L.M. Feldstein.2003. Better together: Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
144.
Rawls, J.1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
145.
Roy, A.2001. A "public"' muse: On planning convictions and feminist contentions. Journal of Planning Education and Research21:109-26.
146.
Rubin, H.J., and I.S. Rubin.2007. Community organizing and development , 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
147.
Saegert, S., and G. Winkel.1998. Social capital and the revitalization of New York City's distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate9:17-60.
148.
Saegert, S., G. Winkel, and C. Swartz.2002. Social capital and crime in New York City's low-income housing. Housing Policy Debate13:189-226.
149.
Salter, L.2003. Democracy, new social movements, and the Internet: A Habermasian analysis. In Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice , ed. M. McCaughey and M. D. Ayers.London: Routledge.
150.
Sandel, M.J.1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. 2nd ed. 1998. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
151.
---. 1984. The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory12: 81-96.
152.
---. 1995. Moral argument and liberal toleration: Abortion and homosexuality . In New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities, ed. A. Etzioni.Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
153.
---. 1996. Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
154.
Sander, T.H.2002. Social capital and new urbanism: Leading a civic horse to water? National Civic Review91:213-34.
155.
Sandercock, L.1998. Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities . Chichester, NY: John Wiley.
156.
---. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities in the 21st century. London and New York: Continuum.
157.
Selznick, P.1992. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
158.
---. 2002. The communitarian persuasion. Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
159.
Sennett, R.1970. The uses of disorder. New York: Knopf.
160.
---. 1978. The fall of public man. New York: Vintage.
161.
---. 1998. The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in new capitalism. New York: Norton.
162.
Servon, L.J.1998. Credit and social capital: The community development potential of U.S. microenterprise programs. Housing Policy Debate9:115-49.
163.
Smart Growth Network.2006. This is smart growth. http://www.smartgrowthonlineaudio.org/pdf/TISG_2006_8-5x11.pdf (accessed June 2007).
164.
Smith, J.1998. Global civil society? Transnational social movement organizations and social capital. American Behavioral Scientist42:93-107.
Smith, S.S.2005. "Don't put my name on it": Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. American Journal of Sociology111:1-57.
167.
Snyder, R.C.2002. Social capital: The politics of race and gender. In Social capital: Critical perspectives on community and "bowling alone," ed. S. L. McLean, D. A. Schultz, and M. B. Steger.New York and London : New York University Press.
168.
Sorkin, M., ed. 1992. Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.
169.
Southworth, M.1997. Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association63:28-44.
170.
Stanziola, J.1999. Arts, government and community revitalization. Aldershot, Hants, UK; Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
171.
Stephenson, B.2002. The roots of the new urbanism: John Nolen's Garden City ethicJournal of Planning History1:99-123.
172.
Talen, E.1999. Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies36:1361-79.
173.
---. 2005. New urbanism and American planning: The conflict of cultures . London: Routledge.
174.
Talen, E., and C. Ellis.2002. Beyond relativism: Reclaiming the search for good city form. Journal of Planning Education and Research22:36-49.
175.
Taylor, C.1985. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In Philosophical papers 2, Philosophy and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
176.
---. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
177.
---. 1995. Liberal politics and the public sphere. In New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities , ed. A. Etzioni.Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia.
178.
Temkin, K., and W.M. Rohe.1998. Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate9:61-88.
179.
Walzer, M.1983. Spheres of justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
180.
---. 1992. What it means to be an American. New York: Marsilio.
181.
---. 1994. Thick and thin. Notre-Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
182.
---. 1995. The communitarian critique of liberalism. In New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities , ed. A. Etzioni.Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia.
183.
Watson, S.2006. City publics: The (dis)enchantments of urban encounters . London and New York: Routledge.
184.
Weitz, J.1999. From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature14:266-337.
185.
Wellman, B., A.Q. Haase, J. Witte, and K. Hampton.2001. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist45:436-455.
186.
Wilson, W.J.1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor . New York: Random House.
187.
Wuthnow, W.2004. Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
188.
Young, Iris M.1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
189.
---. 1998. Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In Feminism, the public and the private, ed. J. Landes.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
190.
---. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
