This paper documents and analyzes a portion of the U.S. government's attempt to adopt the concept of sustainability after 1992. Numerous case studies of individual sustainable community development projects exist, although almost no literature describes the coordinated federal-level effort to create and implement a sustainable development policy from 1993 to 2000. Case studies of three prominent federal-level sustainable community programs are developed from twenty guided interviews and existing government documents. The analysis of these three cases reveals serious attempts to translate sustainability into federal programs and changes in agency cultures despite institutional barriers. Although the primary outcome of these efforts was a stronger framework for facilitation of planning at the federal level, it still remains unclear why planners were not more involved in this process.
Beatley, T.1995. Planning and sustainability: The elements of a new (improved?) paradigm. Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 383-95.
2.
Beatley, T. and K. Manning.1998. The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3.
Berke, P.2002. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature17 (1): 21-36.
4.
Berke, P. and M. Manta-Conroy .2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (1): 21-33.
5.
Browner, C.1998. Remarks to the National Association of Counties, March 2, Washington DC.
6.
Campbell, S.1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradiction of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association62 (3): 296-312.
7.
Chifos, C.2001. From sustainable development to livable cities: Changing terms or changing focus? Implications for U.S. urban policy . Presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Detroit, MI, April.
8.
Clinton, W. and A. Gore.1995. Reinventing environmental regulation . Washington, DC.
9.
Coyle, D.C.1945. The American National Planning Board. The Political Quarterly, 246-252.
10.
Dernbach, J. C. (ed). 2002. Stumbling toward sustainability. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
11.
Farrell, A.1999. Sustainability and decision-making: The EPA's Sustainable Development Challenge Grant Program. Policy Studies Review16 (3/4): 37-73.
12.
Funk, O.1993. Struggling with integrated environmental policy: The EPA experience. Policy Studies Review12 (3/4): 137-161.
13.
Godschalk, D.R.2004. Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association70 (1): 5-13.
14.
Goldman, B.A.1995. Sustainable America: New public policy for the 21stcentury . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
15.
Hanna, K.S.2005. Planning for sustainability: Experience in two contrasting communities. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (1): 27-40.
16.
Haughton, G.1999. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (2): 233-43.
17.
Healey P. and T. Shaw.1993. Planners, plans and sustainable development . Regional Studies27 (8): 769-76.
18.
Hoff, M.D.1998. Sustainable community development: Studies in economic, environmental, and cultural revitalization. Boca Raton : Lewis Publishers.
19.
Horan, T.A., H. Dittmar, and D.R. Jordan.1999. ISTEA and the new era in transportation policy: Sustainable communities from a federal initiative. In Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformation in environmental policy, edited by D. A. Mazmanian and M. E. Kraft, 217-246. Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
20.
Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher.2000. Indicators for sustainable communities: A strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Planning Theory and Practice1 (2): 173-186.
21.
Jepson, E.J. Jr.2001. Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature15 (4): 499-510.
22.
———. 2003. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: How wide, how deep, and what role for planners?Journal of Planning Education and Research23 (2):1-13.
23.
———. 2004. Human nature and sustainable development: A strategic challenge for planning. Journal of Planning Literature19 (1): 3-15.
24.
Kakee, A.2002. Assessing institutional capital building in a Local Agenda 21 process in Goteborg. Planning Theory and Practice3 (1): 53-68.
25.
Kartez, J.D.1989. Rational arguments and irrational audiences. Journal of the American Planning Association55 (4): 445-56.
26.
Krizek, K.J. and J. Power.1996. A planners guide to sustainable development . Planning Advisory Service, Report Number 467. Chicago: American Planning Association.
27.
Lash, J. and D. Buzzelli.1995. Institutions—President's Council on Sustainable Development. Environment37 (3): 44-5.
28.
Mank, B.1998. The Environmental Protection Agency's Program XL and other regulatory reform initiatives: The need for legislative authorization. Ecology Law Quarterly25 (1).
29.
McDonald, G.T.1996. Planning as sustainable development. Journal of Planning Education and Research15 (3): 225-36.
30.
Olson, M.H.1996. Charting a course for sustainability. Environment38 (4): 10-15, 30-36.
31.
Portney, K.2003. Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32.
President's Council on Sustainable Development.1996. Sustainable America: A new consensus for prosperity, opportunity and a healthy environment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
———. 1997a. Building on consensus: A progress report on sustainable America.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
———. 1997b. Sustainable Communities Task Force reportWashington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
———. 1997c. The road to sustainable development: A snapshot of activities in the United StatesWashington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36.
———. 1999. Towards a sustainable America: Advancing prosperity, opportunity, and a healthy environment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
Public Technology Inc.1996. Cities and counties: Thinking globally, acting locally, sustainability in action. Washington, DC.
38.
Selman, P. and J. Parker.1999. Tales of local sustainability. Local Environment4 (1): 47-60.
39.
Spain, D.1995Sustainability, feminist visions, and the utopian tradition . Journal of Planning Literature9 (4): 362-69.
40.
Thomas, D.K. and O.J. Furuseth.1997. The realities of incorporating sustainable development into local-level planning: A case study of Davidson, North Carolina. Cities 14 (4): 219-26.
41.
U.S. Department of Transportation. 2000. Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century; Implementation of the TCSP Pilot Program. Federal Register65 (178): 55317-55325.
42.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996a. Sustainable Development Challenge Grant Program. Federal Register61 (127): 33913-33917.
43.
———. 1996b. Summary information on Sustainable Development Challenge Grant projects selected for funding for FY1996.
44.
———. 1997. Summary information on Sustainable Development Challenge Grant projects selected for funding for FY 1997.
45.
———. 1998. Summary information on Sustainable Development Challenge Grant proposals selected for funding for FY 1998.
46.
———. 1999a. Sustainable Development Challenge Grant Program.Federal Register64 (128): 35650-35656.
47.
———. 1999b. Sustainable Development Challenge Grant proposals selected for funding for FY 1999
48.
———, 2000. Developing for the future: Hometown USA— Innovative community projects supported by EPA grants. Washington, DC: EPA.
49.
Wheeler, S.M.2000. Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (2): 133-45.
