The distinction between urban theory and planning theory is not intellectually viable. Reasons include (1) the historical roots and justification for planning, which depends on a vision of the city rather than simply a method of arriving at prescription; (2) the dependence of effective planning on its context, which means that planning activity needs to be rooted in an understanding of the field in which it is operating; and (3) the objective of planning as conscious creation of the just city, which requires a substantive normative framework.
Altshuler, Alan A.1965. The city planning process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
Altshuler, Alan A., and David Luberoff. 2003. Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Beauregard, Robert A.1990. Bringing the city back in. Journal of the American Planning Association56 (2): 210-215.
4.
Beauregard, Robert A.2003. Democracy, storytelling, and the sustainable city. In Story and sustainability, ed. Barbara Eckstein and James A. Thogmorton, 65-77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Beauregard, Robert A.2004. Mistakes were made. Rebuilding the World Trade Center, phase 1. International Planning Studies9 (2-3): 139-153.
6.
Campbell, Scott. 2003. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. In Readings in planning theory, rev. ed., ed. Scott Campbell and Susan S. Fainstein, 435-458. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
Campbell, Scott, and Susan S. Fainstein. 2003. Readings in planning theory. Rev. ed.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
Castells, Manuel. 1977. The urban question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Castells, Manuel1983. The city and the grassroots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Clavel, Pierre. 1986. The progressive city. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
Clavel, Pierre, John Forester, and William W. Goldsmith, eds. 1980. Urban and regional planning in an age of austerity. New York: Pergamon.
12.
Davidoff, Paul. 1965/2003. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. In Readings in planning theory, rev. ed., ed. Scott Campbell and Susan S. Fainstein, 210-223. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
Dror, Yehezkel. 1968. Public policymaking reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler.
14.
Fainstein, Susan S.1997. Justice, politics, and the creation of urban space. In The urbanization of injustice, ed. Andy Merrifield and Erik Swyngedouw, 18-44. New York: New York University Press.
15.
Fainstein, Susan S.1999. Can we make the cities we want? In The urban moment, ed. Sophie Body-Gendrot and Robert Beauregard, 249-272. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Fainstein, Susan S.2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review35 (4): 451-478.
17.
Fainstein, Susan S.2001. The city builders. Rev. ed.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18.
Fainstein, Susan S., and Scott Campbell.2002. Readings in urban theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
Fainstein, Susan S., and Norman I. Fainstein. 1974. Urban political movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Fainstein, Susan S., and Norman I. Fainstein. 1979. New debates in urban planning: The impact of Marxist theory within the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3 (3): 381-403.
21.
Fainstein, Susan S., and Norman I. Fainstein. 1982. Neighborhood enfranchisement and urban redevelopment. Journal of Planning Education and Research2 (1): 11-19.
22.
Fainstein, Susan S., and Norman I. Fainstein. 1986. Regime strategies, communal resistance, and economic forces. In Restructuring the city, rev. ed., ed. Susan S. Fainstein, Norman I. Fainstein, Richard Child Hill, Dennis Judd, and Michael Peter Smith, 245-282. New York: Longman.
23.
Faludi, Andreas. 1973. A reader in planning theory. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
24.
Fischer, Frank. 1980. Politics, values, and public policy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
25.
Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Flora, Peter, and Arnold Heidenheimer, eds. 1981. The development of welfare states in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
27.
Flyvbjerg, Bent.1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Forester, John. 2000. Conservative epistemology, reductive ethics, far too narrow politics: Some clarifications in response to Yiftachel and Huxley. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24 (4): 914-916.
30.
Friedmann, John. 2000. The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and regional Research24 (2): 459-472.
31.
Friedmann, John. 2002. The prospect of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Gans, Herbert J.1968. People and plans. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
34.
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
Hajer, Maarten A.1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Hall, Peter Geoffrey. 1980. Great planning disasters. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Hall, Peter Geoffrey. 1996. Cities of tomorrow. Rev. ed.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hartman, Chester W.2002. Between eminence and notoriety: Four decades of radical urban planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
40.
Harvey, David. 1978. On planning the ideology of planning. In Planning theory in the 1980s, ed. Robert W. Burchell and George Sternlieb, 213-234. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
41.
Harvey, David. 1992. Social justice, postmodernism and the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16 (4): 588-601.
42.
Healey, Patsy. 1993. Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning, ed. Frank Fischer and John Forester, 233-253. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Huxley, Margo, and Oren Yiftachel. 2000. New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (4): 333-342.
46.
Innes, Judith. 1996. Group processes and the social construction of growth management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey. In Explorations in planning theory, ed. Seymour J. Mandelbaum, Luigi Mazza, and Robert W. Burchell, 164-187. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
47.
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
48.
Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
49.
Krumholz, Norman. 1982. A retrospective view of equity planning: Cleveland, 1969-1979. Journal of the American Planning Association48 (Spring): 163-174.
50.
Krumholz, Norman. 1999/2003. Equitable approaches to local economic development. In Readings in planning theory, ed. Scott Campbell and Susan S. Fainstein, 224-236. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51.
Lasswell, Harold D.1936. Politics: Who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53.
Lindblom, Charles E.1990. Inquiry and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
Mandelbaum, Seymour J., Luigi Mazza, and Robert W. Burchell, eds. 1996. Explorations in planning theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
55.
Mannheim, Karl. 1935/1940. Man and society in an age of reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
56.
Mannheim, Karl. 1936. The sociology of knowledge. In Ideology and utopia, 264-311. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
57.
Merrifield, Andy, and Erik Swyngedouw. 1997. Social justice and the urban experience: an introduction. In The Urbanization of injustice, ed. Andy Merrifield and Erik Swyngedouw, 1-17. New York: New York University Press.
58.
Meyerson, Martin, and Edward C. Banfield. 1955. Politics, planning, and the public interest; the case of public housing in Chicago. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
59.
Mier, Robert. 1993. Social justice and local development policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research66 (3): 745-758.
61.
Neuman, Michael. 2000. Communicate this! Does consensus lead to advocacy and pluralism? Journal of Planning Education and Research19 (4): 343-350.
62.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pickvance, Chris, ed. 1976. Urban sociology. New York: St. Martin’s.
65.
Purcell, Mark. 2003. Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27 (3): 564-590.
66.
Rabinovitz, Francine F.1969. City politics and planning. New York: Atherton.
67.
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
Sandercock, Leonie. 1997. Towards cosmopolis. New York: John Wiley.
69.
Sarbib, Jean Louis. 1983. The University of Chicago Program in Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research2 (2): 77-81.
70.
Sayer, Andrew, and Michael Storper. 1997. Ethics unbound: For a normative turn in social theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15 (1): 1-18.
71.
Schattschneider, Elmer E.1960. The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
72.
Scott, James C.1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
73.
Stone, Clarence N.1976. Economic growth and neighborhood discontent. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
74.
Stone, Clarence N.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
75.
Teitz, Michael. 1996. American planning in the 1990s: Evolution, debate and challenge. Urban Studies33 (4-5): 649-672.
76.
Throgmorton, James A., and Barbara Eckstein, eds. 2003. Story and sustainability: Planning, practice, and possibility for American cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
Weber, Max. 1919/1958. Politics as a vocation. In From Max Weber, ed. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 77-128. New York: Oxford University Press.
