How might Castells’s theory of the network society influence planning? The authors argue that while there is much to learn from Castells, the idea of a network society does not warrant a fundamental revision of planning theory. Rather, it reinforces the scope and relevance of Habermasian communicative action and American pragmatism, ideas that are already recognized within planning.
Baxter, Hugh. 2002. System and lifeworld in Habermas’s theory of law. Cardozo Law Review23 (2): 473-510.
2.
Beauregard, Robert. 1995. Edge critics. Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (3): 163-166.
3.
Blanco, H.1994. How to think about social problems: American pragmatism and the idea of planning. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
4.
Booher, David, and Judith Innes. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (3): 221-236.
5.
Brosius, Peter. 1999. Anthropological engagements with environmentalism. Current Anthropology40 (3): 277-309.
6.
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
Castells, Manuel. 1997. The power of identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
Castells, Manuel. 1998a. End of millenium. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
Castells, Manuel. 1998b. A rejoinder: On power, identities and culture in the network society. New Political Economy3 (3): 473-483.
10.
Cohen, Jean L.1998. American civil society talk. Report from the Institute of Philosophy and Public Policy, 18(3). http://www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/summer98/american_civil_society_talk.htm.
11.
Dewey, John. 1954. Public and its problems. Denver, CO: A. Swallow. (Based on an address given in 1927)
12.
Dryzek, John. 1996. Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization. American Political Science Review90(September): 475-487.
13.
Forester, John. 1980. Listening: The social policy of everyday life (critical theory and hermeneutics in practice). Social Praxis7 (3-4): 219-232.
14.
Forester, John. 1985. Critical theory and public life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Forester, John. 1993. Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School, modern European philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
18.
Giddens, A., and C. Pierson. 1998. Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
19.
Glendon, Mary Ann.1991. Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. New York: Free Press.
20.
Graham, Stephen, and Patsy Healey. 1999. Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies7 (5): 623-646.
21.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. State and civil society. In Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
22.
Gutman, Amy, ed. 1994. Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1. Trans. T. McCarthy. Toronto, Canada: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
25.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.
26.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1994. Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state. In Multiculturalism, ed. Amy Gutman.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Hajer, Maarten, and Wil Zonneveld. 2000. Spatial planning in the network society—Rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies8 (3): 337-355.
29.
Harvey, David. 1989. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30.
Healey, Patsy. 1996. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23:217-234.
31.
Heath, Joseph. 2004. “‘Legitimation crisis’ in the later work of Jürgen Habermas,”http://mapageweb.umontreal.ca/heathj/texts/legitimation.pdf (accessed September 5, 2004).
32.
Hoch, Charles. 1996. A pragmatic inquiry about planning and power. In Explorations in planning theory, ed. S. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R. Burchell.New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Public Policy.
33.
Innes, Judith. 1995. Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research14 (3): 183-191.
34.
Innes, Judith, and David Booher. 1999. Planning institutions in the network society. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
35.
James, William. 1907/1947. Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longman’s Green.
36.
Kumar, Krishan. 1998. The end-of-millennium world. New Political Economy3 (3): 465-468.
37.
Mandelbaum, Seymour. 2000. Open moral communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with human face. Ed. James Conant.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Selznick, Philip. 1992. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of social community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Singer, E. A.1924/1980. Mind as behavior and studies in empirical idealism. Columbus, OH: R.G. Adams.
42.
Stein, M. Stanley, and Thomas L. Harper. 2000. Critiques of communicative planning: A pragmatic response, Paper presented at the ACSP Annual Conference 2000, Atlanta, GA.
43.
Stevenson, Nick. 1998. Contraflows in critical theory. New Political Economy3 (3): 468-473.
44.
Sunstein, Cass. 2001. Designing democracy: What constitutions do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Verma, Niraj. 1996. Pragmatic rationality and planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research16 (1): 5-14.
47.
Verma, Niraj. 1998. Similarities, connections, systems: The search for a new rationality for planning and management. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
48.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.
49.
Webber, Melvin M.1963. Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In Cities and space: The future use of urban land, ed. Lowdon Wingo.Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
