Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article focuses on the relationship between the mobility constraints that low-income families face in their acquisition of food and the coping strategies they develop for this routine task. The motivations and rationale behind travel and provisioning choices of the working poor and the resources available to them are examined by means of a series of semistructured interviews conducted with members of twenty-six low-income house-holds residing in the Austin, Texas, area. The ways that these households cope with their mobility and economic disadvantage are complex, logical, and varied; depend on their resources and circumstances; and must be flexible to deal with day-to-day occurrences. Evidence from this study shows that the flexibility afforded by the automobile widens the spatial and temporal aspects of mobility, allowing for a more extensive search for goods and services. The automobile is an important mode for nonwork travel, even among those households that do not own one. However, the transit and walking remain critical in providing the mobility needed to access food-shopping destinations for these families.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alwitt, L., and T. Donley 1996. The low-income consumer: Adjusting the balance of exchange. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Andreasen, A. R. 1975. The disadvantaged consumer. New York: Free Press.

Bell, J., and B. M. Burlin. 1993. In urban areas: Many of the poor still pay more for food. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 12 (2): 268-271.

Berry, B. 1963. Commercial structure and commercial blight: Retail patterns and processes in the City of Chicago. Research Paper, Department of Geography, University of Chicago.

Bohl, C. 2000. New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighbourhoods. Housing Policy Debate 11 (4): 761-801.

Chung, C., and S. L. Myers Jr. 1999. Do the poor pay more for food: An analysis of grocery store availability and food price disparities. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 33 (2): 276-296.

Cotterill, R., and A. Franklin. 1995. The urban grocery store gap. Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Crane, R. 2000. The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review. Journal of Planning Literature 15 (1): 3-24.

DeVault, M. L. 1991. Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10.

Edin, K., and L. Lein. 1997. Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage.

11.

Freedman, A. 1991. The poor pay more for food in New York, survey finds. Wall Street Journal, B1, B5.

12.

Gilbert, M. 1998. Race, space, and power: The survival strategies of working poor women. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (4): 595.

13.

Gottlieb, R., A. Fisher, M. Dohan, L. O’Connor, and V. Parks. 1996. Homeward bound: Food-related strategies in low income and transit dependent communities. Working Paper, UCTC No. 336, University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley.

14.

Kasarda, J. D. 1995. Industrial restructuring and the changing location of jobs. State of the Union: America in the 1990s, Volume I: Economic trends. Edited by R. Farley. New York: Russell Sage.

15.

Kunreuther, H. 1973. Why the poor pay more for food: Theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Business 46:368-383.

16.

MacDonald, J., and P. Nelson. 1991. Do the poor still pay more? Food price variations in large metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics 30:344-359.

17.

Murakami, E., and J. Young. 1997. Daily travel by persons with low income. Paper presented at the Nationwide Personal Transportation Symposium, October 29-31, Bethesda, MD.

18.

Ong, P., and E. Blumenberg 1998. Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies 35 (1): 77-94.

19.

O’Regan, K., and J. Quigley. 1997. Accessibility and economic opportunity. Working Paper, UCTC No. 362, University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley.

20.

Poppendieck, J. 1998. Sweet charity? Emergency food and the end of entitlement. New York: Viking.

21.

Pothukuchi, K., and J. Kaufman. 2000. The food system: A stranger to the planning field. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (2): 113-124.

22.

Public Voice for Food and Heath Policy. 1995. No place to shop: The lack of super markets in low-income neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Author.

23.

Putnam, J., and J. Allshouse. 1996. Food consumption, prices and expenditures 1996: Annual data 1970-94. Washington, DC: USDA, ERS Statistical Bulletin 928.

24.

Shen, Q. 2000. Spatial and social dimensions of commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (1): 68-83.

25.

Stack, Carol B. 1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

26.

Sturgis, E. 1997. Can we help build inner city co-ops? Cooperative Grocer 71:209.

27.

Taylor, B., and P. Ong. 1995. Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 32 (9): 1453-1473.

28.

Wachs, M., and B. Taylor. 1997. Can transport strategies help meet the welfare challenge? Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (1): 15-20.

29.

Wilson, W. J. 1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Random House.

30.

Wood, V. 2000. Carrying the burden. The Austin Chronicle, April 28, http:/www.auschron.com/issues/dispatch/2000-04-28/food_feature.html.

31.

Yim, Y. 1993. Shopping trips and the spatial distribution of food stores. Working Paper, UCTC No. 125, University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley.

Mobility Strategies and Food Shopping for Low-Income Families

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References