This study compares urban renewal in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s with inner-city redevelopment in China since the late 1980s. It finds that both programs use government authority and subsidies to make large-scale private or quasi-private investment attractive in the name of ameliorating living conditions. Cautiously applying Logan and Molotch’s “growth coalition” concept to China, the authors assert that a “growth machine” has formed during China’s economic decentralization processes. Despite the similarities, America’s urban renewal was an ill-fated federal program in which the local government and downtown business interests cooperated to boost declining inner-cities that were competing with burgeoning suburbs. In contrast, China’s redevelopment has been propelled by emerging local elites using decentralized state power to pursue fast growth in rising real estate markets. Greater insights into urban redevelopment can be gleaned through this comparative analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Daniel B. 1997. Neighborhood redevelopment as a cultural problem: A Western perspective on current plans for the Old City of Beijing. PhD diss., Tsinghua University, Beijing.
2.
Anderson, Martin. 1964. The federal bulldozer: A critical analysis of urban renewal, 1949-1962.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Biles, Roger. 2000. Public housing and the postwar urban renaissance. In From tenements to the Taylor Homes: In search of an urban housing policy in twentieth-century America, edited by John Bauman, Roger Biles, and Kristin Szylvian, 143-162. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
4.
Bluestone, Barry, and Bennett Harrison. 1982. The deindustrialization of America: Plan closings, community abandonment, and the dismantling of basic industry. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Broudehoux, Anne-Marie. 1994. Neighborhood regeneration in Beijing: An overview of projects implemented in the inner city since 1990. Master’s thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
6.
Deng, Frederic F. 2003. The political economy of public land leasing in urban China. In Leasing public land: Policy debates and international experiences, edited by Steven C. Bourassa and Yu-Hung Hong. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
7.
Eckholm, Erik. 1998. A burst of renewal sweeps old Beijing into the dumpsters. New York Times, March 1.
8.
Fainstein, Susan S. 1986. Restructuring the city: The political economy of urban redevelopment. New York: Longman.
9.
Fainstein, Susan S. [1994] 2001. The city builders: Property development in New York and London, 1980-2000.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
10.
Fang, Ke.. 1999. Housing relocation and housing property in Beijing. China Lawyers17 (5): 33-36.
11.
Fang, Ke.. 2000. Contemporary redevelopment in the inner city of Beijing: Survey, analysis and investigation. Beijing: China Construction Industry Publishing House.
12.
Fang, Ke, and Yan Zhang. 2003. Plan and market mismatch: Urban redevelopment in Beijing during a period of transition. Asia Pacific View Point44 (2): 149-162
13.
Freidman, Lawrence. 1968. Government and slum housing: A century of frustration. Chicago: Rand McNally.
14.
Frieden, Bernard, and Marshall Kaplan, 1975. The politics of neglect: Urban aid from model cities to revenue sharing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Frieden, Bernard J., and Lynne B. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown, Inc., how America rebuilds cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gans, Herbert J. 1962. The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans.New York: Free Press.
18.
Gans, Herbert J. 1968. People and plans: Essays on urban problems and solutions. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Goldman, Jasper. 2003. From Hutong to high-rise: Explaining the transformation of Old Beijing, 1990-2002. Master’s thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
20.
Halpern, Robert. 1995. Rebuilding the inner city: A history of neighborhood initiatives to address poverty in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Hartman, Chester. 1966. The housing of relocated families. In Urban renewal: The record and the controversy, edited by James Wilson, 293-335. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Huang, Yasheng. 1996. Inflation and investment controls in China: The political economy of central-local relations during the reform era. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Husock, Howard. 1998. The widening of Ping An Avenue: Making decisions about historic preservation. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government Case Program, Harvard University.
24.
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
25.
Jessop, Bob, Jamie Peck, and Adam Tickell. 1999. Retooling the machine, the urban growth machine. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives, two decades later, edited by Andrew Jonas and David Wilson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Jonas, Andrew, and David Wilson, eds. 1999. The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives, two decades later. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Keyes, Langley C. 1969. The rehabilitation planning game: A study in the diversity of neighborhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Leaf, Michael. 1995. Inner city redevelopment in China: Implication for the city of Beijing. Cities12 (3): 149-162.
29.
Leaf, Michael. 1998. Urban planning and urban reality under Chinese economic reforms. Journal of Planning Education and Research18 (2): 145-153.
30.
Logan, John, ed. 2002. The new Chinese city: Globalization and market reform.Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Logan, John R., and Todd Swanstrom, eds. 1990. Beyond the city limits: Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Mollenkopf, John. 1983. The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Molotch, Harvey. 1976. The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2): 309-332
35.
Molotch, Harvey. 1990. Urban deals in comparative perspective. In Beyond the city limits: Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective, edited by John Logan and Todd Swanstrom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36.
Molotch, Harvey. 1993. The political economy of growth machines. Journal of Urban Affairs15:19-53.
37.
Molotch, Harvey. 1999. Growth machine links: Up, down, and across. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives, two decades later, edited by Andrew Jonas and David Wilson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
38.
Ng, Mee-Kam, and Fulong Wu. 1995. A critique of the 1989 City Planning Act of the People’s Republic of China: AWestern perspective. Third World Planning Review17 (3): 279-294.
39.
O’Neil, Mark. 2000. The city that went under the hammer. South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, January 1.
40.
Rothenberg, Jerome. 1967. Economic evaluation of urban renewal: Conceptual foundation of benefit-cost analysis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41.
Shi, Tianjian. 1997. Political participation in Beijing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Sohmer, Rebecca R., and Robert E. Lang. 2000. From seaside to southside: New urbanism’s quest to save the inner city. Housing Policy Debate11 (4): 751-760
43.
State Statistical Bureau. 1992. Urban statistical yearbook 1992. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
44.
Steinfeld, Edward. 1998. Forging reform in China: The fate of stateowned industry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Tan, Ying, and Johan Nilsson. 2000. Advocacy work on conservation and tourism development in the old city of Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Anthropology, Chinese Society and Tourism in Kunming, China, September 28 to October 3, 1999.
46.
Tang, Wing-Shing. 2000. Chinese urban planning at fifty: An assessment of the planning theory literature. Journal of Planning Literature14 (2): 347-366.
47.
Teaford, Jon. 2000. Urban renewal and its aftermath. Housing Policy Debate11 (2): 443-465.
48.
von Hoffman, Alexander. 2000. A study in contradictions: The origins and legacy of the Housing Act of 1949. Housing Policy Debate11 (2): 299-326.
49.
Walder, Andrew. 1995. The quiet revolution from within: Economic reform as a source of political decline. In The waning of the Communist state—Economic origins of political decline in China and Hungary, edited by AndrewWalder. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
Walton, John. 1990. Theoretical methods in comparative urban politics. In Beyond the city limits: Urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective, edited by John Logan and Todd Swanstrom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
51.
Wang, Jun. 1996. Review of land development in Beijing. Outlook (Liao Wang)1:35-37. Beijing: Xinhua News Agency.
52.
Wang, Yaping, and Alan Murie. 1996. The process of commercialization of urban housing in China. Urban Studies33(6): 971-989.
53.
Weiss, Marc. [1985] 1990. The origins and legacy of urban renewal. In Federal housing policy and programs, past and present, edited by Paul Mitchell, 253-276. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
54.
Wood, Andrew. 1999. Organizing for local economic development: The growth coalition as a cross-national comparative framework. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives, two decades later, edited by Andrew Jonas and David Wilson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
55.
Wu, Fulong. 2000. The global and local dimensions of placemaking: Remaking Shanghai as a world city. Urban Studies37 (8): 1359-1377.
56.
Wu, Fulong. 2001. China’s recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalisation. Habitat International25:273-289.
57.
Wu, Liangyong. 1999. Rehabilitating the Old City of Beijing—A project in the Ju’er Hutong neighbourhood. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
58.
Yan, Zhigang. 1998. Land speculation in Beijing. Economy Daily (Jing Ji Ri Bao), June 24.
59.
Yeh, Anthony, and Fulong Wu. 1999. The transformation of the urban planning system in China from a centrally-planned to transitional economy. Progress in Planning51:165-252.
60.
Zhang, Tingwei. 2002. Urban development and a socialist progrowth coalition in Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review37 (4): 475-499.
61.
Zhang, Yan, and Ke Fang. 2003. Politics of housing redevelopment in China—The rise and fall of the Ju’er Hutong Project in inner-city Beijing. Journal of Housing and Built Environment18 (1): 75-87.
62.
Zhou, Min, and John Logan. 1996. Market transition and the commodification of housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20:400-421.
63.
Zhou, Yixing, and Laurence J. C. Ma. 2000. Economic restructuring and suburbanization in China. Urban Geography21 (3): 205-236.
64.
Zhu, Jiemin. 1999. Local growth coalition: The context and implications of China’s gradualist urban land reforms. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23 (3): 534-548.
65.
Zou, Deci. 1998. Chinese cities towards the 21st century. City Planning Review22 (1): 7-9.
